Deep learning-based automatic segmentation of arterial vessel walls and plaques in MR vessel wall images for quantitative assessment.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Long Yang, Xiong Yang, Zhenhuan Gong, Yufei Mao, Shan-Shan Lu, Chengcheng Zhu, Liwen Wan, Junhui Huang, Mohd Halim Mohd Noor, Ke Wu, Cheng Li, Guanxun Cheng, Ye Li, Dong Liang, Xin Liu, Hairong Zheng, Zhanli Hu, Na Zhang
{"title":"Deep learning-based automatic segmentation of arterial vessel walls and plaques in MR vessel wall images for quantitative assessment.","authors":"Long Yang, Xiong Yang, Zhenhuan Gong, Yufei Mao, Shan-Shan Lu, Chengcheng Zhu, Liwen Wan, Junhui Huang, Mohd Halim Mohd Noor, Ke Wu, Cheng Li, Guanxun Cheng, Ye Li, Dong Liang, Xin Liu, Hairong Zheng, Zhanli Hu, Na Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11697-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate a deep-learning-based automatic method for vessel walls and atherosclerotic plaques segmentation for quantitative evaluation in MR vessel wall images.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 193 patients (107 patients for training and validation, 39 patients for internal test, 47 patients for external test) with atherosclerotic plaque from five centers underwent T1-weighted MRI scans and were included in the dataset. The first step of the proposed method was constructing a purely learning-based convolutional neural network (CNN) named Vessel-SegNet to segment the lumen and the vessel wall. The second step is using the vessel wall priors (including manual prior and Tversky-loss-based automatic prior) to improve the plaque segmentation, which utilizes the morphological similarity between the vessel wall and the plaque. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), etc., were used to evaluate the similarity, agreement, and correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the DSCs for lumen and vessel wall segmentation were above 90%. The introduction of vessel wall priors can increase the DSC for plaque segmentation by over 10%, reaching 88.45%. Compared to dice-loss-based vessel wall priors, the Tversky-loss-based priors can further improve DSC by nearly 3%, reaching 82.84%. Most of the ICC values between the Vessel-SegNet and manual methods in the 6 quantitative measurements are greater than 85% (p-value < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed CNN-based segmentation model can quickly and accurately segment vessel walls and plaques for quantitative evaluation. Due to the lack of testing with other equipment, populations, and anatomical studies, the reliability of the research results still requires further exploration.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question How can the accuracy and efficiency of vessel component segmentation for quantification, including the lumen, vessel wall, and plaque, be improved? Findings Improved CNN models, manual/automatic vessel wall priors, and Tversky loss can improve the performance of semi-automatic/automatic vessel components segmentation for quantification. Clinical relevance Manual segmentation of vessel components is a time-consuming yet important process. Rapid and accurate segmentation of the lumen, vessel walls, and plaques for quantification assessment helps patients obtain more accurate, efficient, and timely stroke risk assessments and clinical recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11697-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and validate a deep-learning-based automatic method for vessel walls and atherosclerotic plaques segmentation for quantitative evaluation in MR vessel wall images.

Materials and methods: A total of 193 patients (107 patients for training and validation, 39 patients for internal test, 47 patients for external test) with atherosclerotic plaque from five centers underwent T1-weighted MRI scans and were included in the dataset. The first step of the proposed method was constructing a purely learning-based convolutional neural network (CNN) named Vessel-SegNet to segment the lumen and the vessel wall. The second step is using the vessel wall priors (including manual prior and Tversky-loss-based automatic prior) to improve the plaque segmentation, which utilizes the morphological similarity between the vessel wall and the plaque. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), etc., were used to evaluate the similarity, agreement, and correlations.

Results: Most of the DSCs for lumen and vessel wall segmentation were above 90%. The introduction of vessel wall priors can increase the DSC for plaque segmentation by over 10%, reaching 88.45%. Compared to dice-loss-based vessel wall priors, the Tversky-loss-based priors can further improve DSC by nearly 3%, reaching 82.84%. Most of the ICC values between the Vessel-SegNet and manual methods in the 6 quantitative measurements are greater than 85% (p-value < 0.001).

Conclusion: The proposed CNN-based segmentation model can quickly and accurately segment vessel walls and plaques for quantitative evaluation. Due to the lack of testing with other equipment, populations, and anatomical studies, the reliability of the research results still requires further exploration.

Key points: Question How can the accuracy and efficiency of vessel component segmentation for quantification, including the lumen, vessel wall, and plaque, be improved? Findings Improved CNN models, manual/automatic vessel wall priors, and Tversky loss can improve the performance of semi-automatic/automatic vessel components segmentation for quantification. Clinical relevance Manual segmentation of vessel components is a time-consuming yet important process. Rapid and accurate segmentation of the lumen, vessel walls, and plaques for quantification assessment helps patients obtain more accurate, efficient, and timely stroke risk assessments and clinical recommendations.

基于深度学习的MR血管壁图像中动脉血管壁和斑块的自动分割定量评估。
目的:开发并验证一种基于深度学习的血管壁和动脉粥样硬化斑块自动分割方法,用于MR血管壁图像的定量评估。材料和方法:来自五个中心的共有193例动脉粥样硬化斑块患者(107例用于训练和验证,39例用于内部测试,47例用于外部测试)接受了t1加权MRI扫描,并被纳入数据集。该方法的第一步是构建一个纯粹基于学习的卷积神经网络(CNN),名为vessel - segnet,用于分割管腔和血管壁。第二步,利用血管壁先验(包括人工先验和基于tversky -loss的自动先验),利用血管壁和斑块之间的形态相似性,改进斑块分割。采用Dice相似系数(DSC)、类内相关系数(ICC)等评价相似性、一致性和相关性。结果:大多数dsc用于管腔和血管壁分割的准确率在90%以上。引入血管壁先验可以使斑块分割的DSC提高10%以上,达到88.45%。与基于dice-loss的血管壁先验相比,基于tversky -loss的先验可以进一步提高DSC近3%,达到82.84%。在6项定量测量中,vessel - segnet与手工方法的ICC值均大于85% (p值)。结论:本文提出的基于cnn的分割模型可以快速准确地分割血管壁和斑块进行定量评估。由于缺乏其他设备、人群和解剖研究的检验,研究结果的可靠性仍需进一步探索。如何提高包括管腔、血管壁和斑块在内的血管成分分割定量的准确性和效率?改进的CNN模型、手动/自动血管壁先验和Tversky损失可以提高半自动/自动血管成分分割的量化性能。人工分割血管成分是一个耗时但重要的过程。快速准确地分割管腔、血管壁和斑块进行量化评估,有助于患者获得更准确、有效和及时的卒中风险评估和临床建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信