Negative Effect of Prior Lesion Manipulation on Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-02 DOI:10.1007/s10620-025-09102-y
Daryl Ramai, Abdulrahman Qatomah, Hiroyuki Aihara
{"title":"Negative Effect of Prior Lesion Manipulation on Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Daryl Ramai, Abdulrahman Qatomah, Hiroyuki Aihara","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-09102-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive technique for en-bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal lesions. However, the influence of prior manipulations, such as tattooing or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), on ESD outcomes is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study evaluated 763 patients (mean age 64 years, 52% female) who underwent colorectal ESD at Brigham and Women's Hospital between 2014 and 2024. Outcomes included rates of en-bloc, R0, curative resection, and adverse events. Multivariable regression analysis identified factors associated with unsuccessful outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean lesion diameter was 50 mm, with 54.4% located in the right colon. Prior tattooing occurred in 7% of cases while prior EMR was reported in 17% of lesions. En-bloc resection was achieved in 95% of cases, R0 resection in 89%, and curative resection in 88%. The mean procedure time was 64 min, with adverse events including delayed bleeding (3.3%), muscle injury (0.9%), and perforation (0.8%). Factors linked to unsuccessful en-bloc resection were prior tattooing (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.09-0.98; P = 0.047), prior EMR (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.82; P = 0.017), and submucosal fibrosis (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.53; P = 0.001). Submucosal fibrosis also reduced R0 and curative resection rates. No statistically significant associations between procedural adverse events and fibrosis, prior EMR, or tattooing were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the importance of avoiding unnecessary pre-procedural manipulations and emphasize the need for urgent planning to optimize ESD outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"3097-3101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09102-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive technique for en-bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal lesions. However, the influence of prior manipulations, such as tattooing or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), on ESD outcomes is not well understood.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated 763 patients (mean age 64 years, 52% female) who underwent colorectal ESD at Brigham and Women's Hospital between 2014 and 2024. Outcomes included rates of en-bloc, R0, curative resection, and adverse events. Multivariable regression analysis identified factors associated with unsuccessful outcomes.

Results: The mean lesion diameter was 50 mm, with 54.4% located in the right colon. Prior tattooing occurred in 7% of cases while prior EMR was reported in 17% of lesions. En-bloc resection was achieved in 95% of cases, R0 resection in 89%, and curative resection in 88%. The mean procedure time was 64 min, with adverse events including delayed bleeding (3.3%), muscle injury (0.9%), and perforation (0.8%). Factors linked to unsuccessful en-bloc resection were prior tattooing (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.09-0.98; P = 0.047), prior EMR (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.82; P = 0.017), and submucosal fibrosis (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.53; P = 0.001). Submucosal fibrosis also reduced R0 and curative resection rates. No statistically significant associations between procedural adverse events and fibrosis, prior EMR, or tattooing were found.

Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of avoiding unnecessary pre-procedural manipulations and emphasize the need for urgent planning to optimize ESD outcomes.

先前病变处理对结肠内镜下粘膜下剥离结果的负面影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)是一种微创术,用于胃肠道浅表病变的整体切除。然而,先前的操作,如纹身或内镜粘膜切除(EMR),对ESD结果的影响尚不清楚。方法:本回顾性队列研究评估了2014年至2024年间在布莱根妇女医院接受结肠直肠ESD治疗的763例患者(平均年龄64岁,52%为女性)。结果包括整体发生率、R0、治愈性切除和不良事件。多变量回归分析确定了与失败结果相关的因素。结果:病变平均直径50 mm, 54.4%位于右结肠。既往纹身的病例占7%,而既往EMR报告的病变占17%。整体切除率为95%,R0切除率为89%,治愈性切除率为88%。平均手术时间为64分钟,不良事件包括延迟出血(3.3%)、肌肉损伤(0.9%)和穿孔(0.8%)。与整体切除失败相关的因素是先前的纹身(OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.09-0.98;P = 0.047),既往EMR (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.82;P = 0.017),粘膜下纤维化(OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.53;p = 0.001)。粘膜下纤维化也降低R0和治愈率。程序性不良事件与纤维化、既往EMR或纹身之间没有统计学上的显著关联。结论:这些发现强调了避免不必要的术前操作的重要性,并强调了紧急计划以优化ESD结果的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信