{"title":"Negative Effect of Prior Lesion Manipulation on Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Daryl Ramai, Abdulrahman Qatomah, Hiroyuki Aihara","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-09102-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive technique for en-bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal lesions. However, the influence of prior manipulations, such as tattooing or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), on ESD outcomes is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study evaluated 763 patients (mean age 64 years, 52% female) who underwent colorectal ESD at Brigham and Women's Hospital between 2014 and 2024. Outcomes included rates of en-bloc, R0, curative resection, and adverse events. Multivariable regression analysis identified factors associated with unsuccessful outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean lesion diameter was 50 mm, with 54.4% located in the right colon. Prior tattooing occurred in 7% of cases while prior EMR was reported in 17% of lesions. En-bloc resection was achieved in 95% of cases, R0 resection in 89%, and curative resection in 88%. The mean procedure time was 64 min, with adverse events including delayed bleeding (3.3%), muscle injury (0.9%), and perforation (0.8%). Factors linked to unsuccessful en-bloc resection were prior tattooing (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.09-0.98; P = 0.047), prior EMR (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.82; P = 0.017), and submucosal fibrosis (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.53; P = 0.001). Submucosal fibrosis also reduced R0 and curative resection rates. No statistically significant associations between procedural adverse events and fibrosis, prior EMR, or tattooing were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the importance of avoiding unnecessary pre-procedural manipulations and emphasize the need for urgent planning to optimize ESD outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"3097-3101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09102-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive technique for en-bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal lesions. However, the influence of prior manipulations, such as tattooing or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), on ESD outcomes is not well understood.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated 763 patients (mean age 64 years, 52% female) who underwent colorectal ESD at Brigham and Women's Hospital between 2014 and 2024. Outcomes included rates of en-bloc, R0, curative resection, and adverse events. Multivariable regression analysis identified factors associated with unsuccessful outcomes.
Results: The mean lesion diameter was 50 mm, with 54.4% located in the right colon. Prior tattooing occurred in 7% of cases while prior EMR was reported in 17% of lesions. En-bloc resection was achieved in 95% of cases, R0 resection in 89%, and curative resection in 88%. The mean procedure time was 64 min, with adverse events including delayed bleeding (3.3%), muscle injury (0.9%), and perforation (0.8%). Factors linked to unsuccessful en-bloc resection were prior tattooing (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.09-0.98; P = 0.047), prior EMR (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.82; P = 0.017), and submucosal fibrosis (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.53; P = 0.001). Submucosal fibrosis also reduced R0 and curative resection rates. No statistically significant associations between procedural adverse events and fibrosis, prior EMR, or tattooing were found.
Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of avoiding unnecessary pre-procedural manipulations and emphasize the need for urgent planning to optimize ESD outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.