Validation of R2* magnetic resonance imaging for quantifying secondary iron overload in pediatric patients.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Tahani M Ahmad, Fareed Khdair Ahmad, Mohamed Abdolell, Olfat Ahmad, Matthew T Rogers
{"title":"Validation of R2* magnetic resonance imaging for quantifying secondary iron overload in pediatric patients.","authors":"Tahani M Ahmad, Fareed Khdair Ahmad, Mohamed Abdolell, Olfat Ahmad, Matthew T Rogers","doi":"10.4274/dir.2025.253282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Non-invasive assessment of iron deposition is the standard of care for guiding chelation therapy in patients with iron overload. Several magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based techniques have been developed. This study compares the MRI-based R2* method with the standard R2-based method for quantifying iron levels in the liver and heart in children and young adults with secondary iron overload.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center prospective study was conducted over 2.5 years involving 14 patients aged 4-22 years with secondary iron overload. These patients underwent 40 MRI scans using both R2 and R2* methods at same time. A total of 36 scans were analyzed, comparing the two methods using linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study shows a significant correlation between liver iron concentration measurements obtained using the R2* method and those obtained using the R2-based method (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.77128). The agreement was even stronger for R2* values in the cardiac septum (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.93483).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The R2* method for assessing iron deposition in the liver and cardiac septum is comparable to the R2-based method and is suitable for clinical use. However, due to slight differences in measurements between the two techniques, it is advisable to consistently use one method for monitoring treatment in each patient. Further research is needed to refine the calibration equations.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study highlights the MRI-based R2* method as a reliable, non-invasive, and cost-effective alternative to the R2-based method for monitoring iron overload in pediatric patients, with no additional costs for institutions or third parties.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2025.253282","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Non-invasive assessment of iron deposition is the standard of care for guiding chelation therapy in patients with iron overload. Several magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based techniques have been developed. This study compares the MRI-based R2* method with the standard R2-based method for quantifying iron levels in the liver and heart in children and young adults with secondary iron overload.

Methods: A single-center prospective study was conducted over 2.5 years involving 14 patients aged 4-22 years with secondary iron overload. These patients underwent 40 MRI scans using both R2 and R2* methods at same time. A total of 36 scans were analyzed, comparing the two methods using linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots.

Results: The study shows a significant correlation between liver iron concentration measurements obtained using the R2* method and those obtained using the R2-based method (adjusted R2 = 0.77128). The agreement was even stronger for R2* values in the cardiac septum (adjusted R2 = 0.93483).

Conclusion: The R2* method for assessing iron deposition in the liver and cardiac septum is comparable to the R2-based method and is suitable for clinical use. However, due to slight differences in measurements between the two techniques, it is advisable to consistently use one method for monitoring treatment in each patient. Further research is needed to refine the calibration equations.

Clinical significance: This study highlights the MRI-based R2* method as a reliable, non-invasive, and cost-effective alternative to the R2-based method for monitoring iron overload in pediatric patients, with no additional costs for institutions or third parties.

R2*磁共振成像定量儿科患者继发性铁超载的验证。
目的:无创铁沉积评估是指导铁超载患者螯合治疗的护理标准。几种基于磁共振成像(MRI)的技术已经被开发出来。本研究比较了基于mri的R2*方法与基于R2的标准方法,用于定量继发性铁超载儿童和年轻人肝脏和心脏中的铁水平。方法:对14例4-22岁继发性铁超载患者进行为期2.5年的单中心前瞻性研究。这些患者同时使用R2和R2*方法进行了40次MRI扫描。共分析了36个扫描,使用线性回归分析和Bland-Altman图对两种方法进行了比较。结果:本研究显示,采用R2*法测定的肝铁浓度与采用R2-based法测定的肝铁浓度存在显著相关性(调整后的R2 = 0.77128)。心间隔R2*值的一致性更强(调整后R2 = 0.93483)。结论:R2*法评价肝、心隔铁沉积与基于R2的方法相当,适合临床应用。然而,由于两种技术之间测量的细微差异,建议在每个患者中始终使用一种方法监测治疗情况。需要进一步的研究来完善标定方程。临床意义:本研究强调基于mri的R2*方法是一种可靠的、无创的、具有成本效益的替代基于R2的方法来监测儿科患者铁超载,不需要机构或第三方支付额外费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostic and interventional radiology
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信