Radiotherapy for patients with brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: prognostic factors and clinical outcomes.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Lena Maria Blattmann, Rami El Shafie, Stephanie Bendrich, Sandra Donath, Olga Knaus, Andrea Hille, Tammam Abboud, Manuel Guhlich, Martin Leu, Markus Anton Schirmer, Mahalia Zoe Anczykowski, Laura Anna Fischer, Benedikt Kieslich, Philipp Jung, Stefan Rieken, Carla Marie Zwerenz, Leif Hendrik Dröge
{"title":"Radiotherapy for patients with brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: prognostic factors and clinical outcomes.","authors":"Lena Maria Blattmann, Rami El Shafie, Stephanie Bendrich, Sandra Donath, Olga Knaus, Andrea Hille, Tammam Abboud, Manuel Guhlich, Martin Leu, Markus Anton Schirmer, Mahalia Zoe Anczykowski, Laura Anna Fischer, Benedikt Kieslich, Philipp Jung, Stefan Rieken, Carla Marie Zwerenz, Leif Hendrik Dröge","doi":"10.1007/s10585-025-10352-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) are complications of advanced-stage malignancies, associated with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the role of prognostic factors and radiotherapy (RT) treatment approaches while taking toxicity into account. We performed a retrospective study and compared clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, toxicities and outcomes in patients with (1) parenchymal brain metastases (PM) (n = 275) vs. LC (n = 35) and (2) in patients with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) (n = 52) vs. WBRT + boost (n = 201). We found poorer survival (OS) of the LC group compared to PM patients in univariable analysis (not in multivariable analysis). LC patients predominantly underwent WBRT only, received surgical resection before RT less frequently and had more RT discontinuations than PM patients. OS was better in the WBRT + boost group than in the WBRT only group. In patients who received WBRT + boost, the primary tumor was more often controlled, and the number of PM was lower compared to the WBRT only group. WBRT + boost was associated with higher rates of alopecia than WBRT only. Patients with LC had a worse prognosis compared to patients with PM. WBRT + boost resulted in higher toxicity than WBRT only but resulted in better OS in the presented study. WBRT + boost patients had more favorable prognostic factors prior to RT, so OS improvement is not likely due to boost. Treating brain metastases requires a careful assessment of benefits and risks. Optimal RT planning should consider prognostic factors and potential side effects individually.</p>","PeriodicalId":10267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis","volume":"42 4","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-025-10352-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) are complications of advanced-stage malignancies, associated with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the role of prognostic factors and radiotherapy (RT) treatment approaches while taking toxicity into account. We performed a retrospective study and compared clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, toxicities and outcomes in patients with (1) parenchymal brain metastases (PM) (n = 275) vs. LC (n = 35) and (2) in patients with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) (n = 52) vs. WBRT + boost (n = 201). We found poorer survival (OS) of the LC group compared to PM patients in univariable analysis (not in multivariable analysis). LC patients predominantly underwent WBRT only, received surgical resection before RT less frequently and had more RT discontinuations than PM patients. OS was better in the WBRT + boost group than in the WBRT only group. In patients who received WBRT + boost, the primary tumor was more often controlled, and the number of PM was lower compared to the WBRT only group. WBRT + boost was associated with higher rates of alopecia than WBRT only. Patients with LC had a worse prognosis compared to patients with PM. WBRT + boost resulted in higher toxicity than WBRT only but resulted in better OS in the presented study. WBRT + boost patients had more favorable prognostic factors prior to RT, so OS improvement is not likely due to boost. Treating brain metastases requires a careful assessment of benefits and risks. Optimal RT planning should consider prognostic factors and potential side effects individually.

脑转移和脑膜轻脑癌患者的放疗:预后因素和临床结果。
脑转移和轻脑膜癌(LC)是晚期恶性肿瘤的并发症,与预后不良相关。本研究旨在评估预后因素和放疗(RT)治疗方法的作用,同时考虑毒性。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,比较了(1)脑实质转移(PM) (n = 275)和LC (n = 35)患者的临床特征、预后因素、毒性和结局;(2)全脑放疗(WBRT) (n = 52)和WBRT + boost (n = 201)患者的临床特征、预后因素、毒性和结局。在单变量分析(非多变量分析)中,我们发现LC组的生存率(OS)低于PM患者。LC患者主要只接受了WBRT,在放疗前接受手术切除的频率较PM患者低,并且与PM患者相比有更多的RT中断。WBRT + boost组的OS优于单纯WBRT组。在接受WBRT +增强的患者中,原发肿瘤通常得到控制,PM的数量比仅接受WBRT的组更低。与仅WBRT相比,WBRT +增加与更高的脱发率相关。LC患者的预后比PM患者差。在本研究中,WBRT +增加的毒性比WBRT单独增加的毒性更高,但产生了更好的OS。WBRT + boost患者在RT之前有更有利的预后因素,因此OS改善不太可能是由于boost。治疗脑转移瘤需要仔细评估益处和风险。最佳的放疗计划应单独考虑预后因素和潜在的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal''s scope encompasses all aspects of metastasis research, whether laboratory-based, experimental or clinical and therapeutic. It covers such areas as molecular biology, pharmacology, tumor biology, and clinical cancer treatment (with all its subdivisions of surgery, chemotherapy and radio-therapy as well as pathology and epidemiology) insofar as these disciplines are concerned with the Journal''s core subject of metastasis formation, prevention and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信