No additional benefit with detoxification strategies: A real world experience in 200 patients with chronic migraine and either simple or complex MOH treated with CGRP monoclonal antibodies.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cephalalgia Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-02 DOI:10.1177/03331024251329808
Marcello Silvestro, Ilaria Orologio, Pasquale Sozio, Valentina Dortucci, Francesca Trojsi, Mattia Siciliano, Gioacchino Tedeschi, Alessandro Tessitore, Antonio Russo
{"title":"No additional benefit with detoxification strategies: A real world experience in 200 patients with chronic migraine and either simple or complex MOH treated with CGRP monoclonal antibodies.","authors":"Marcello Silvestro, Ilaria Orologio, Pasquale Sozio, Valentina Dortucci, Francesca Trojsi, Mattia Siciliano, Gioacchino Tedeschi, Alessandro Tessitore, Antonio Russo","doi":"10.1177/03331024251329808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAlthough withdrawal from analgesics with or without detoxification strategy represented a mainstay in medication overuse headache (MOH) management, recent evidence supports that it is no longer beneficial when CGRP-targeting monoclonal antibodies (CGRP-mAbs) are employed. However, MOH could be stratified into simple and complex MOH phenotypes according to different clinical parameters (i.e., amounts and class of analgesics, psychiatric comorbidities, history of relapse after withdrawal, symptoms of central sensitization, and maladaptive anticipatory response to pain experience). Herein, we explored the effectiveness of CGRP-mAbs plus detoxification strategy compared to CGRP- mAbs preventive treatment alone in patients with either simple or complex MOH phenotypes.MethodsThis is a six-month observational study including chronic migraine patients with MOH treated with subcutaneous CGRP-mAbs. Patients were stratified based on both MOH complexity and detoxification strategy to evaluate differences in the changes of monthly headache days, pain intensity and duration, and monthly days with acute medication intake after the first, third and sixth month of preventive treatment with CGRP-mAbs.ResultsTwo hundred patients with migraine and MOH were recruited. A significant reduction of headache attacks frequency, intensity, duration and monthly days with acute medication intake has been observed both in patients sub-classified as complex MOH (58.5%) and in those with simple MOH (41.5%) after the first, third and sixth month of preventive treatment with CGRP-mAbs (p < 0.001). Furthermore, stratifying patients based on the MOH complexity and detoxification strategy, no differences were found in the reduction of monthly headache days as well as in other parameters of disease severity (p > 0.05).ConclusionOur findings might suggest a change in the mind-set of clinicians, still considering the withdrawal with or without detoxification strategy as a \"conditio sine qua non\" in patients with MOH, towards a novel approach where the reduction of analgesics intake represents the natural consequence of CGRP-mAbs effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 6","pages":"3331024251329808"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251329808","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough withdrawal from analgesics with or without detoxification strategy represented a mainstay in medication overuse headache (MOH) management, recent evidence supports that it is no longer beneficial when CGRP-targeting monoclonal antibodies (CGRP-mAbs) are employed. However, MOH could be stratified into simple and complex MOH phenotypes according to different clinical parameters (i.e., amounts and class of analgesics, psychiatric comorbidities, history of relapse after withdrawal, symptoms of central sensitization, and maladaptive anticipatory response to pain experience). Herein, we explored the effectiveness of CGRP-mAbs plus detoxification strategy compared to CGRP- mAbs preventive treatment alone in patients with either simple or complex MOH phenotypes.MethodsThis is a six-month observational study including chronic migraine patients with MOH treated with subcutaneous CGRP-mAbs. Patients were stratified based on both MOH complexity and detoxification strategy to evaluate differences in the changes of monthly headache days, pain intensity and duration, and monthly days with acute medication intake after the first, third and sixth month of preventive treatment with CGRP-mAbs.ResultsTwo hundred patients with migraine and MOH were recruited. A significant reduction of headache attacks frequency, intensity, duration and monthly days with acute medication intake has been observed both in patients sub-classified as complex MOH (58.5%) and in those with simple MOH (41.5%) after the first, third and sixth month of preventive treatment with CGRP-mAbs (p < 0.001). Furthermore, stratifying patients based on the MOH complexity and detoxification strategy, no differences were found in the reduction of monthly headache days as well as in other parameters of disease severity (p > 0.05).ConclusionOur findings might suggest a change in the mind-set of clinicians, still considering the withdrawal with or without detoxification strategy as a "conditio sine qua non" in patients with MOH, towards a novel approach where the reduction of analgesics intake represents the natural consequence of CGRP-mAbs effectiveness.

解毒策略没有额外的好处:200例慢性偏头痛患者的真实世界经验,无论是简单的还是复杂的MOH,都用CGRP单克隆抗体治疗。
背景:虽然有或没有解毒策略的镇痛药物的退出是药物过度使用头痛(MOH)管理的主要方法,但最近的证据支持,当使用cgrp -靶向单克隆抗体(cgrp - mab)时,它不再有益。然而,根据不同的临床参数(即镇痛药的数量和种类、精神合并症、停药后复发史、中枢致敏症状、对疼痛经历的不良预期反应),MOH可分为简单型和复杂型。在此,我们探讨了CGRP- mab联合解毒策略与CGRP- mab单独预防治疗在简单或复杂MOH表型患者中的有效性。方法:这是一项为期6个月的观察性研究,包括使用皮下cgrp - mab治疗MOH的慢性偏头痛患者。根据MOH复杂性和解毒策略对患者进行分层,以评估cgrp - mab预防治疗第1、3和6个月后每月头痛天数、疼痛强度和持续时间以及每月急性药物摄入天数的变化差异。结果共纳入200例偏头痛合并MOH患者。在用cgrp - mab抗体进行第1、3和6个月的预防性治疗后,观察到复合MOH患者(58.5%)和单纯性MOH患者(41.5%)在急性药物摄入后头痛发作频率、强度、持续时间和每月天数均显著减少(p 0.05)。结论:我们的研究结果可能表明,临床医生的思维模式发生了变化,他们仍然认为有或没有解毒策略的戒断是MOH患者的“必要条件”,而采用一种新的方法,即减少镇痛药的摄入是cgrp - mab有效性的自然结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信