C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A protein as complementary biomarkers in differentiating viral and bacterial community-acquired pneumonia in children.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Juan Cheng, Ying Wu, Hui Ma, Mingyu Tang, Yufen Wu, Yong Yin, Qiuhui Pan, Qizhi Diao, Jing Zhang
{"title":"C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A protein as complementary biomarkers in differentiating viral and bacterial community-acquired pneumonia in children.","authors":"Juan Cheng, Ying Wu, Hui Ma, Mingyu Tang, Yufen Wu, Yong Yin, Qiuhui Pan, Qizhi Diao, Jing Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12887-025-05770-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Distinguishing between viral and bacterial community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children is crucial for guiding targeted management and antibiotic use. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of serum amyloid A protein(SAA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as biomarkers to differentiate viral from bacterial CAP in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 441 hospitalized children with a confirmed diagnosis of CAP were initially selected. Of these, 206 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, including 132 cases of viral pneumonia and 74 cases of bacterial pneumonia. Baseline data and clinical characteristics were collected. Respiratory pathogen detection and blood biomarker measurements, including SAA and CRP levels, were completed within 24 h of admission. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the effectiveness of SAA, CRP, and their combination in differentiating between viral and bacterial CAP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fever (body temperature ≥ 38 °C) was more frequently observed in the bacterial CAP group (95.9%) compared to the viral CAP group (75%, P = 0.000). Wheezing was more prevalent in the viral CAP group (40.2% vs. 24.3%, P = 0.022). CRP and SAA levels were significantly higher in the bacterial CAP group (CRP: 27.6 (6.5, 49.4) mg/L vs. 3 (0.7, 8.4) mg/L, P = 0.000; SAA: 190.1 (70, 297.4) mg/L vs. 13.5 (1.4, 48.2) mg/L, P = 0.000). The area under the ROC curve for CRP and SAA was 0.84 (0.78 ∼ 0.90) and 0.85 (0.79 ∼ 0.91), respectively. The cutoff points were 86.55 mg/L for SAA and 19.65 mg/L for CRP, with sensitivities of 86.9% and 94.6%, and specificities of 73.0% and 63.5%, respectively. Combining SAA and CRP detection with clinical symptoms increases specificity to 93.2% and 97.3% but reduces sensitivity to 31.3% and 22.7% in distinguishing viral from bacterial pneumonia. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed that CRP was an independent predictor of bacterial pneumonia (OR = 1.098, P < 0.001) and was strongly correlated with SAA (Pearson r = 0.816, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRP and SAA are effective biomarkers for distinguishing between viral and bacterial CAP in children, with CRP demonstrating independent predictive value. The combined detection of CRP and SAA, along with clinical symptoms (such as fever or wheezing), significantly enhances diagnostic specificity but requires a trade-off with reduced sensitivity. This finding provides important evidence for the early precise classification of pediatric CAP and the rational use of antibiotics, but its clinical value still needs to be validated through larger-scale multicenter studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9144,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pediatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05770-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Distinguishing between viral and bacterial community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children is crucial for guiding targeted management and antibiotic use. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of serum amyloid A protein(SAA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as biomarkers to differentiate viral from bacterial CAP in children.

Methods: A total of 441 hospitalized children with a confirmed diagnosis of CAP were initially selected. Of these, 206 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, including 132 cases of viral pneumonia and 74 cases of bacterial pneumonia. Baseline data and clinical characteristics were collected. Respiratory pathogen detection and blood biomarker measurements, including SAA and CRP levels, were completed within 24 h of admission. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the effectiveness of SAA, CRP, and their combination in differentiating between viral and bacterial CAP.

Results: Fever (body temperature ≥ 38 °C) was more frequently observed in the bacterial CAP group (95.9%) compared to the viral CAP group (75%, P = 0.000). Wheezing was more prevalent in the viral CAP group (40.2% vs. 24.3%, P = 0.022). CRP and SAA levels were significantly higher in the bacterial CAP group (CRP: 27.6 (6.5, 49.4) mg/L vs. 3 (0.7, 8.4) mg/L, P = 0.000; SAA: 190.1 (70, 297.4) mg/L vs. 13.5 (1.4, 48.2) mg/L, P = 0.000). The area under the ROC curve for CRP and SAA was 0.84 (0.78 ∼ 0.90) and 0.85 (0.79 ∼ 0.91), respectively. The cutoff points were 86.55 mg/L for SAA and 19.65 mg/L for CRP, with sensitivities of 86.9% and 94.6%, and specificities of 73.0% and 63.5%, respectively. Combining SAA and CRP detection with clinical symptoms increases specificity to 93.2% and 97.3% but reduces sensitivity to 31.3% and 22.7% in distinguishing viral from bacterial pneumonia. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed that CRP was an independent predictor of bacterial pneumonia (OR = 1.098, P < 0.001) and was strongly correlated with SAA (Pearson r = 0.816, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: CRP and SAA are effective biomarkers for distinguishing between viral and bacterial CAP in children, with CRP demonstrating independent predictive value. The combined detection of CRP and SAA, along with clinical symptoms (such as fever or wheezing), significantly enhances diagnostic specificity but requires a trade-off with reduced sensitivity. This finding provides important evidence for the early precise classification of pediatric CAP and the rational use of antibiotics, but its clinical value still needs to be validated through larger-scale multicenter studies.

c反应蛋白和血清淀粉样蛋白A作为鉴别儿童病毒性和细菌性社区获得性肺炎的补充生物标志物
目的:区分儿童病毒性和细菌性社区获得性肺炎(CAP)对指导有针对性的治疗和抗生素的使用至关重要。本研究旨在评估血清淀粉样蛋白A (SAA)和c反应蛋白(CRP)作为区分儿童病毒性和细菌性CAP的生物标志物的有效性。方法:初步选取确诊为CAP的住院患儿441例。其中,206例符合纳入和排除标准,包括132例病毒性肺炎和74例细菌性肺炎。收集基线数据和临床特征。入院后24小时内完成呼吸道病原体检测和血液生物标志物测量,包括SAA和CRP水平。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,评价SAA、CRP及其联合应用在区分病毒性CAP和细菌性CAP中的有效性。结果:细菌CAP组(95.9%)比病毒CAP组(75%,P = 0.000)更常出现发热(体温≥38°C)。喘息在病毒性CAP组更为普遍(40.2%比24.3%,P = 0.022)。细菌CAP组CRP和SAA水平显著升高(CRP: 27.6 (6.5, 49.4) mg/L vs. 3 (0.7, 8.4) mg/L, P = 0.000;SAA: 190.1 (297.4 70) mg / L和13.5 mg / L (1.4, 48.2), P = 0.000)。CRP和SAA的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.84(0.78 ~ 0.90)和0.85(0.79 ~ 0.91)。SAA和CRP的临界值分别为86.55 mg/L和19.65 mg/L,敏感性分别为86.9%和94.6%,特异性分别为73.0%和63.5%。结合临床症状检测SAA和CRP,区分病毒性肺炎和细菌性肺炎的特异性分别为93.2%和97.3%,敏感性分别为31.3%和22.7%。多因素回归分析证实CRP是细菌性肺炎的独立预测因子(OR = 1.098, P)。结论:CRP和SAA是区分儿童病毒性和细菌性CAP的有效生物标志物,其中CRP具有独立的预测价值。联合检测CRP和SAA,并伴有临床症状(如发热或喘息),可显著提高诊断特异性,但需要以降低敏感性为代价。这一发现为小儿CAP的早期精确分类和合理使用抗生素提供了重要依据,但其临床价值仍需通过更大规模的多中心研究来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pediatrics
BMC Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
683
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pediatrics is an open access journal publishing peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of health care in neonates, children and adolescents, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信