Memantine augmentation of escitalopram in treatment of executive function among patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Hasan Mirzazadeh, Younes Ghaeminia, Amin Mohamad Niaei, Mohammadsadegh Kamran, Leila Razeghian Jahromi, Reza Moshfeghinia
{"title":"Memantine augmentation of escitalopram in treatment of executive function among patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Hasan Mirzazadeh, Younes Ghaeminia, Amin Mohamad Niaei, Mohammadsadegh Kamran, Leila Razeghian Jahromi, Reza Moshfeghinia","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06856-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) involves persistent, intrusive thoughts and repetitive behaviors. While SSRIs like escitalopram are common treatments, some patients do not respond adequately. This study aims to assess memantine's effectiveness as an adjunct therapy to enhance executive function in OCD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate if adding memantine to escitalopram helps treat OCD. A total of 60 participants were recruited from Namazi Hospital and Ibn Sina Polyclinic in Shiraz, Iran. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: the control group received escitalopram plus placebo, and the intervention group received escitalopram plus memantine. The main outcome, the severity of OCD symptoms, was measured using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), and executive function was assessed using the Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale (BDEFS). Safety was checked weekly using the Drug Adverse Event Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All sixty participants completed the 16 weeks of the study. Thirty participants per group (Placebo, Memantine) showed no significant differences in age, gender, or education (P > 0.05) at baseline. Both groups showed significant reductions in Y-BOCS scores (P < 0.001), with the Placebo group decreasing from 32.83 (SD = 4.04) to 5.30 (SD = 3.18) and the Memantine group from 31.60 (SD = 2.62) to 5.20 (SD = 2.62) without difference between groups (P = 0.12). Notebale Improvements in executive function were observed, particularly in time management, where Memantine outperformed Placebo (P = 0.03). Other domains showed no significant differences. Adverse events were minimal; gastrointestinal symptoms were rare, with Memantine showing a higher incidence but not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study found that while both treatment regimens significantly alleviated OCD symptoms, memantine did not provide notable advantages over escitalopram alone, except in time management. Further research is needed to assess long-term effects and mechanisms of this combination therapy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>IRCT20211118053093N5, 25/06/2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"561"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12131613/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06856-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) involves persistent, intrusive thoughts and repetitive behaviors. While SSRIs like escitalopram are common treatments, some patients do not respond adequately. This study aims to assess memantine's effectiveness as an adjunct therapy to enhance executive function in OCD patients.

Methods: This study was a 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate if adding memantine to escitalopram helps treat OCD. A total of 60 participants were recruited from Namazi Hospital and Ibn Sina Polyclinic in Shiraz, Iran. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: the control group received escitalopram plus placebo, and the intervention group received escitalopram plus memantine. The main outcome, the severity of OCD symptoms, was measured using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), and executive function was assessed using the Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale (BDEFS). Safety was checked weekly using the Drug Adverse Event Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

Results: All sixty participants completed the 16 weeks of the study. Thirty participants per group (Placebo, Memantine) showed no significant differences in age, gender, or education (P > 0.05) at baseline. Both groups showed significant reductions in Y-BOCS scores (P < 0.001), with the Placebo group decreasing from 32.83 (SD = 4.04) to 5.30 (SD = 3.18) and the Memantine group from 31.60 (SD = 2.62) to 5.20 (SD = 2.62) without difference between groups (P = 0.12). Notebale Improvements in executive function were observed, particularly in time management, where Memantine outperformed Placebo (P = 0.03). Other domains showed no significant differences. Adverse events were minimal; gastrointestinal symptoms were rare, with Memantine showing a higher incidence but not statistically significant.

Conclusion: The study found that while both treatment regimens significantly alleviated OCD symptoms, memantine did not provide notable advantages over escitalopram alone, except in time management. Further research is needed to assess long-term effects and mechanisms of this combination therapy.

Trial registration: IRCT20211118053093N5, 25/06/2025.

艾司西酞普兰治疗强迫症患者执行功能的美金刚增强:一项双盲安慰剂对照随机临床试验。
背景:强迫症(OCD)包括持续的、侵入性的想法和重复的行为。虽然像艾司西酞普兰这样的ssri类药物是常见的治疗方法,但有些患者的反应并不充分。本研究旨在评估美金刚作为辅助治疗增强强迫症患者执行功能的有效性。方法:本研究是一项为期16周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验,旨在评估在艾司西酞普兰中加入美金刚是否有助于治疗强迫症。从伊朗设拉子的Namazi医院和Ibn Sina综合诊所共招募了60名参与者。参与者随机分为两组:对照组给予艾司西酞普兰加安慰剂,干预组给予艾司西酞普兰加美金刚。主要结果是强迫症症状的严重程度,使用耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)测量,执行功能使用巴克利执行功能缺陷量表(BDEFS)评估。每周使用药物不良事件问卷检查安全性。数据使用SPSS进行分析,显著性水平设置为p。结果:所有60名参与者完成了16周的研究。每组30名参与者(安慰剂组、美金刚组)在基线时年龄、性别或教育程度无显著差异(P < 0.05)。结论:研究发现,虽然两种治疗方案都能显著缓解强迫症症状,但美金刚与艾司西酞普兰相比,除了在时间管理方面,并没有明显的优势。需要进一步的研究来评估这种联合治疗的长期效果和机制。试验注册:IRCT20211118053093N5, 25/06/2025。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信