Interaction effect of comorbid depression and proactive positivity coping strategy on the 1-year survival of patients with advanced cancer: a nationwide multicentre study in South Korea.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Ju Youn Jung, Je-Yeon Yun, Jung Hun Kang, Su-Jin Koh, Yu Jung Kim, Seyoung Seo, Jung Hoon Kim, JaeKyung Cheon, Eun Joo Kang, Eun-Kee Song, Eun Mi Nam, Ho-Suk Oh, Hye Jin Choi, Jung Hye Kwon, Woo-Kyun Bae, Jung Eun Lee, Kyung Hae Jung, EunKyo Kang, Young Ho Yun
{"title":"Interaction effect of comorbid depression and proactive positivity coping strategy on the 1-year survival of patients with advanced cancer: a nationwide multicentre study in South Korea.","authors":"Ju Youn Jung, Je-Yeon Yun, Jung Hun Kang, Su-Jin Koh, Yu Jung Kim, Seyoung Seo, Jung Hoon Kim, JaeKyung Cheon, Eun Joo Kang, Eun-Kee Song, Eun Mi Nam, Ho-Suk Oh, Hye Jin Choi, Jung Hye Kwon, Woo-Kyun Bae, Jung Eun Lee, Kyung Hae Jung, EunKyo Kang, Young Ho Yun","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06972-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Comorbid depression and poor performance status are associated with increased mortality and reduced quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. Coping strategies based on \"proactive positivity\" may facilitate adaptation to functional decline and limited life expectancy. However, few studies have examined the impact of the interaction between depressive symptoms and coping strategies on survival outcomes in this population. This study investigated the associations of 1-year survival with the interaction between comorbid depression and proactive coping strategies, and performance status, in patients with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of data from a multicentre randomized clinical trial of patients with advanced cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03181854). A total of 144 patients who were aware of their cancer diagnosis were recruited from 12 tertiary hospitals across South Korea between October 2017 and October 2018. In this prospective cohort design, participants were stratified into subgroups with higher versus lower levels of baseline proactive coping (proactive positivity) and followed for 1 year to assess survival status. Demographic and socioeconomic data were collected via self-report questionnaires, while cancer diagnosis and treatment information was obtained from attending oncologists. Cancer-related physical functioning, depressive symptoms, and coping strategies were assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool- short form (SAT-SF), respectively. Univariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with 1-year survival, and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was developed to evaluate the predictive impact of performance status, depression, and the interaction between depression and proactive positivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In univariate Cox regression models, lower performance status (ECOG-PS = 2; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-4.34) and comorbid depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 10; HR = 2.76, 95% CI: 1.72-4.42) were associated with increased risk of not surviving for 1 year. In the multivariate model, among patients with lower proactive positivity (SAT-SF Core strategies score ≤ 66.66/100), comorbid depression was associated with a 363% higher risk of 1-year mortality compared to those without depression (adjusted HR = 4.63, 95% CI: 2.54-8.43). Conversely, the association between depression and 1-year survival was not statistically significant among patients with higher proactive positivity (SAT-SF score > 66.66/100).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comorbid depression is associated with a significantly higher risk of 1-year mortality in patients with advanced cancer who exhibit lower levels of proactive positivity, but not in those with higher levels of proactive coping. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating assessments of psychological resilience and coping strategies into the clinical management of advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov); registration number (NCT03181854); study registration dates [first submitted (2017-06-07), first submitted that met QC criteria (2017-06-07), first posted (2017-06-09)].</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"565"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12131379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06972-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Comorbid depression and poor performance status are associated with increased mortality and reduced quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. Coping strategies based on "proactive positivity" may facilitate adaptation to functional decline and limited life expectancy. However, few studies have examined the impact of the interaction between depressive symptoms and coping strategies on survival outcomes in this population. This study investigated the associations of 1-year survival with the interaction between comorbid depression and proactive coping strategies, and performance status, in patients with advanced cancer.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of data from a multicentre randomized clinical trial of patients with advanced cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03181854). A total of 144 patients who were aware of their cancer diagnosis were recruited from 12 tertiary hospitals across South Korea between October 2017 and October 2018. In this prospective cohort design, participants were stratified into subgroups with higher versus lower levels of baseline proactive coping (proactive positivity) and followed for 1 year to assess survival status. Demographic and socioeconomic data were collected via self-report questionnaires, while cancer diagnosis and treatment information was obtained from attending oncologists. Cancer-related physical functioning, depressive symptoms, and coping strategies were assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool- short form (SAT-SF), respectively. Univariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with 1-year survival, and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was developed to evaluate the predictive impact of performance status, depression, and the interaction between depression and proactive positivity.

Results: In univariate Cox regression models, lower performance status (ECOG-PS = 2; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-4.34) and comorbid depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 10; HR = 2.76, 95% CI: 1.72-4.42) were associated with increased risk of not surviving for 1 year. In the multivariate model, among patients with lower proactive positivity (SAT-SF Core strategies score ≤ 66.66/100), comorbid depression was associated with a 363% higher risk of 1-year mortality compared to those without depression (adjusted HR = 4.63, 95% CI: 2.54-8.43). Conversely, the association between depression and 1-year survival was not statistically significant among patients with higher proactive positivity (SAT-SF score > 66.66/100).

Conclusions: Comorbid depression is associated with a significantly higher risk of 1-year mortality in patients with advanced cancer who exhibit lower levels of proactive positivity, but not in those with higher levels of proactive coping. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating assessments of psychological resilience and coping strategies into the clinical management of advanced cancer.

Trial registration: Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov); registration number (NCT03181854); study registration dates [first submitted (2017-06-07), first submitted that met QC criteria (2017-06-07), first posted (2017-06-09)].

共病抑郁和积极主动应对策略对晚期癌症患者1年生存率的相互作用:韩国一项全国性多中心研究
背景:在晚期癌症患者中,共病性抑郁和不良的工作状态与死亡率增加和生活质量下降有关。基于“积极主动”的应对策略可能有助于适应功能衰退和有限的预期寿命。然而,很少有研究调查抑郁症状和应对策略之间的相互作用对这一人群生存结果的影响。本研究调查了晚期癌症患者的1年生存率与共病抑郁、积极应对策略和表现状态之间的相互作用的关系。方法:这是一项针对晚期癌症患者的多中心随机临床试验(ClinicalTrials.gov识别码:NCT03181854)的数据的二次分析。2017年10月至2018年10月,从韩国12家三级医院招募了144名知道自己癌症诊断的患者。在这项前瞻性队列设计中,参与者被分为基线主动应对(积极主动)水平较高和较低的亚组,随访1年以评估生存状况。人口统计和社会经济数据通过自我报告问卷收集,而癌症诊断和治疗信息则从主治肿瘤学家那里获得。在基线和12周时分别使用东部肿瘤合作小组绩效状态量表(ECOG-PS)、患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)和健康评估工具智能管理策略-简表(SAT-SF)对癌症相关的身体功能、抑郁症状和应对策略进行评估。采用单因素Cox回归分析确定与1年生存率相关的因素,并建立多因素Cox比例风险模型,评估表现状态、抑郁情绪以及抑郁情绪与主动积极情绪之间的相互作用对预后的影响。结果:在单因素Cox回归模型中,较低的工作状态(ECOG-PS = 2;风险比[HR] = 2.33, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.25-4.34)和共病性抑郁(PHQ-9≥10;HR = 2.76, 95% CI: 1.72-4.42)与不能存活1年的风险增加相关。在多变量模型中,在主动性阳性较低的患者(SAT-SF Core strategies评分≤66.66/100)中,与无抑郁症患者相比,共病性抑郁症与1年死亡风险高363%相关(调整后HR = 4.63, 95% CI: 2.54-8.43)。相反,在主动性阳性(SAT-SF评分为66.66/100)较高的患者中,抑郁与1年生存率之间的相关性无统计学意义。结论:合并症抑郁症与表现出较低积极主动水平的晚期癌症患者1年死亡率显著升高相关,但与表现出较高积极应对水平的患者无关。这些发现强调了将心理弹性评估和应对策略纳入晚期癌症临床管理的重要性。试验注册:注册中心(ClinicalTrials.gov);注册号(NCT03181854);研究注册日期[首次提交(2017-06-07),首次提交符合QC标准(2017-06-07),首次发布(2017-06-09)]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信