Gender as a sensor of nurses' depression, compassion fatigue and resilience.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Reem Ahmad Jarrad, Eman Al Hourani, Naser Ibrahim Mahmoud, Dua' Jum'a Al-Fayoumi
{"title":"Gender as a sensor of nurses' depression, compassion fatigue and resilience.","authors":"Reem Ahmad Jarrad, Eman Al Hourani, Naser Ibrahim Mahmoud, Dua' Jum'a Al-Fayoumi","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-07010-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gender is a sensor in certain professional psychological risks. One of those professions is nursing; it has a humanistic nature that is double-loaded with triggers of negative psychological sequelae such as depression and compassion fatigue. To help male and female nurses cope successfully with variable trauma, resilience pathways are activated, yet using different mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in depression, compassion fatigue, and resilience based on gender and the variables of education, marital status, and income.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>631 hospital-based nurses participated in this correlational descriptive study. Measurements included a demographic survey, depression risk score measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies of Depression Scale (CESD), compassion fatigue score by Charles Figley, and resilience score measured by Connor-Davidson resilience scale-10 items. Analysis used descriptive statistics for gender, health sector, education, marital status, income, and department. Student t-test and ANOVA were used to investigate the differences in depression, compassion fatigue, and resilience based on gender, education, marital status, and income.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Male nurses significantly reported higher depression levels (t (629) = 4.8, p <.001, M = 29.1, SD = 10.3) than female nurses (M = 27.2, SD = 9.2). They reported significantly higher compassion fatigue (t (629) = 4.8, p <.001, M = 46,9, SD = 24.3) when compared to female nurses (M = 38.2, SD = 21.3). There was no gender-based difference in resilience scores between male (t = 0.037, P =.97 >.05), M = 23.7, SD = 7.8)) and female nurses (M = 23.7, SD = 8.2). There were no significant differences in depression, compassion fatigue, and resilience based on other demographic variables such as education, marital status, and income (p >.05). Depression had little negative relationship with resilience (r = -.116, p =.004) and a moderate positive relationship with compassion fatigue (r =.529, p <.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurses' male gender showed dominance in depression and compassion fatigue over nurses' female gender. Resilience capabilities were generally the same between the two genders. Nevertheless, for both genders, compassion fatigue and depression risks were high and resilience scores were low. The negative relationship between depression and resilience suggests that health authorities should promote nurses' mental health to increase resilience capacities. Adopting gender-sensitive approaches in research and clinical practice in nurses' mental health is increasingly recommended with special cultural and contextual considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"566"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12131524/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07010-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gender is a sensor in certain professional psychological risks. One of those professions is nursing; it has a humanistic nature that is double-loaded with triggers of negative psychological sequelae such as depression and compassion fatigue. To help male and female nurses cope successfully with variable trauma, resilience pathways are activated, yet using different mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in depression, compassion fatigue, and resilience based on gender and the variables of education, marital status, and income.

Methods: 631 hospital-based nurses participated in this correlational descriptive study. Measurements included a demographic survey, depression risk score measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies of Depression Scale (CESD), compassion fatigue score by Charles Figley, and resilience score measured by Connor-Davidson resilience scale-10 items. Analysis used descriptive statistics for gender, health sector, education, marital status, income, and department. Student t-test and ANOVA were used to investigate the differences in depression, compassion fatigue, and resilience based on gender, education, marital status, and income.

Results: Male nurses significantly reported higher depression levels (t (629) = 4.8, p <.001, M = 29.1, SD = 10.3) than female nurses (M = 27.2, SD = 9.2). They reported significantly higher compassion fatigue (t (629) = 4.8, p <.001, M = 46,9, SD = 24.3) when compared to female nurses (M = 38.2, SD = 21.3). There was no gender-based difference in resilience scores between male (t = 0.037, P =.97 >.05), M = 23.7, SD = 7.8)) and female nurses (M = 23.7, SD = 8.2). There were no significant differences in depression, compassion fatigue, and resilience based on other demographic variables such as education, marital status, and income (p >.05). Depression had little negative relationship with resilience (r = -.116, p =.004) and a moderate positive relationship with compassion fatigue (r =.529, p <.001).

Conclusion: Nurses' male gender showed dominance in depression and compassion fatigue over nurses' female gender. Resilience capabilities were generally the same between the two genders. Nevertheless, for both genders, compassion fatigue and depression risks were high and resilience scores were low. The negative relationship between depression and resilience suggests that health authorities should promote nurses' mental health to increase resilience capacities. Adopting gender-sensitive approaches in research and clinical practice in nurses' mental health is increasingly recommended with special cultural and contextual considerations.

性别对护士抑郁、同情疲劳和恢复力的影响。
背景:性别是某些职业心理风险的传感器。其中一个职业是护理;它具有人文主义的本质,同时也会引发抑郁和同情疲劳等负面心理后遗症。为了帮助男性和女性护士成功应对各种创伤,恢复能力途径被激活,但使用不同的机制。本研究的目的是评估基于性别和教育、婚姻状况和收入变量的抑郁、同情疲劳和弹性的差异。方法:对631名医院护士进行相关描述性研究。测量方法包括人口统计学调查、抑郁症流行病学研究中心抑郁风险量表(CESD)测量的抑郁风险评分、查尔斯·菲格利(Charles Figley)测量的同情疲劳评分和康纳-戴维森(Connor-Davidson)恢复力量表-10项测量的恢复力评分。分析使用了性别、卫生部门、教育、婚姻状况、收入和部门的描述性统计。采用学生t检验和方差分析分析了不同性别、教育程度、婚姻状况和收入对抑郁、同情疲劳和心理弹性的影响。结果:男护士的抑郁水平显著高于女护士(t (629) = 4.8, p .05), M = 23.7, SD = 7.8)。在其他人口统计变量如教育、婚姻状况和收入的基础上,抑郁、同情疲劳和恢复力没有显著差异(p < 0.05)。抑郁与心理弹性呈负相关(r = -)。116, p =.004),并且与同情疲劳有中等正相关(r =。529, p结论:男性护士在抑郁和同情疲劳方面优于女性护士。弹性能力在两性之间基本相同。然而,无论男女,同情疲劳和抑郁的风险都很高,恢复力得分很低。抑郁症与心理弹性之间的负相关关系提示卫生当局应促进护士的心理健康,以提高心理弹性能力。越来越多的人建议在护士心理健康的研究和临床实践中采用对性别敏感的方法,并考虑到特殊的文化和背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信