{"title":"Vascular Stiffness, Instead of Coronary Artery Calcification, Exhibits Significant Association With Hypertension Risk in General Population.","authors":"Chia-Ter Chao, Min-Tser Liao, Chung-Kuan Wu","doi":"10.1093/ajh/hpaf096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension (HTN) significantly increases cardiovascular risk worldwide, and its incidence is expected to rise further over time. Both coronary artery calcification (CAC) and vascular stiffness (VS) potentially contribute to hypertension, but whether CAC and VS jointly aggravates the risk of hypertension remains under-explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively assembled a cohort of individuals with low cardiovascular risk. Coronary computed tomography and pulse wave velocity test were used to measure CAC and VS, respectively. Subsequently, we conducted multiple logistic regression to investigate risk factors for having hypertension, incorporating CAC or VS statuses adjusting for demographics, anthropometric indices, laboratory, and echocardiographic parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 321 community-dwelling individuals (55 ± 11 years; 73.21% male) were included. Unadjusted analyses showed that participants with CAC (odds ratio (OR) 2.331, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41-3.84) or VS (OR 15.701, 95% CI 4.77-51.58) had significantly higher hypertension risk, whereas multivariate adjustment negated the relationship between CAC and hypertension (OR 1.149, 95% CI 0.55-2.38) but not that between VS and hypertension (OR 12.950, 95% CI 2.87-58.31). Analyses incorporating CAC and VS simultaneously showed that only VS independently correlated with hypertension risk but not CAC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VS plays a more important role in affecting hypertension risk compared with CAC in general population. We suggest that targeting VS would be a more appropriate strategy for mitigating incident hypertension compared with treating CAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7578,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"797-805"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hypertension (HTN) significantly increases cardiovascular risk worldwide, and its incidence is expected to rise further over time. Both coronary artery calcification (CAC) and vascular stiffness (VS) potentially contribute to hypertension, but whether CAC and VS jointly aggravates the risk of hypertension remains under-explored.
Methods: We retrospectively assembled a cohort of individuals with low cardiovascular risk. Coronary computed tomography and pulse wave velocity test were used to measure CAC and VS, respectively. Subsequently, we conducted multiple logistic regression to investigate risk factors for having hypertension, incorporating CAC or VS statuses adjusting for demographics, anthropometric indices, laboratory, and echocardiographic parameters.
Results: Totally 321 community-dwelling individuals (55 ± 11 years; 73.21% male) were included. Unadjusted analyses showed that participants with CAC (odds ratio (OR) 2.331, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41-3.84) or VS (OR 15.701, 95% CI 4.77-51.58) had significantly higher hypertension risk, whereas multivariate adjustment negated the relationship between CAC and hypertension (OR 1.149, 95% CI 0.55-2.38) but not that between VS and hypertension (OR 12.950, 95% CI 2.87-58.31). Analyses incorporating CAC and VS simultaneously showed that only VS independently correlated with hypertension risk but not CAC.
Conclusions: VS plays a more important role in affecting hypertension risk compared with CAC in general population. We suggest that targeting VS would be a more appropriate strategy for mitigating incident hypertension compared with treating CAC.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Hypertension is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scientific inquiry of the highest standards in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular disease. The journal publishes high-quality original research and review articles on basic sciences, molecular biology, clinical and experimental hypertension, cardiology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, endocrinology, neurophysiology, and nephrology.