{"title":"Assessment of anisotropic mechanical response of human skin: insights from a clinical trial.","authors":"Aflah Elouneg, Arnaud Lejeune, Gwenaël Rolin, Thomas Lihoreau, Brice Chatelain, Stéphane Bordas, Emmanuelle Jacquet, Jérôme Chambert","doi":"10.1007/s10237-025-01955-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper presents findings from the SKin Uncertainties Modeling (SKUM) clinical trial aimed at assessing the anisotropic mechanical response of human skin using the annular suction test, employing a numerical method and a commercial device, CutiScan<sup>®</sup> CS 100. A cohort of 30 healthy volunteers participated in the trial, undergoing in vivo testing on the left forearm through a multi-axial stretch induced by ring suction. Determination of the anisotropy axis was performed using a numerical method based on model fitting of experimental data obtained from oriented elliptic curves, which resulted from the radial deformation of circles. The study evaluates the reproducibility and variability of measurements through an intra-subject study involving five participants, providing insights into the consistency of results within individuals. Additionally, an inter-subject analysis across all subjects offers a comprehensive understanding of anisotropy variability, elucidating broader population tendencies. Furthermore, the study explores correlations between anisotropy and demographic factors such as sex, age, and skin thickness, shedding light on potential influences on skin biomechanics. The analysis showed significant correlations between skin anisotropy and sex, with males displaying a distinct anisotropy axis orientation compared to females. In contrast, no significant associations were found between anisotropy and age among individuals aged 20-50, or between anisotropy and epidermal thickness.</p>","PeriodicalId":489,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","volume":" ","pages":"1085-1102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-025-01955-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper presents findings from the SKin Uncertainties Modeling (SKUM) clinical trial aimed at assessing the anisotropic mechanical response of human skin using the annular suction test, employing a numerical method and a commercial device, CutiScan® CS 100. A cohort of 30 healthy volunteers participated in the trial, undergoing in vivo testing on the left forearm through a multi-axial stretch induced by ring suction. Determination of the anisotropy axis was performed using a numerical method based on model fitting of experimental data obtained from oriented elliptic curves, which resulted from the radial deformation of circles. The study evaluates the reproducibility and variability of measurements through an intra-subject study involving five participants, providing insights into the consistency of results within individuals. Additionally, an inter-subject analysis across all subjects offers a comprehensive understanding of anisotropy variability, elucidating broader population tendencies. Furthermore, the study explores correlations between anisotropy and demographic factors such as sex, age, and skin thickness, shedding light on potential influences on skin biomechanics. The analysis showed significant correlations between skin anisotropy and sex, with males displaying a distinct anisotropy axis orientation compared to females. In contrast, no significant associations were found between anisotropy and age among individuals aged 20-50, or between anisotropy and epidermal thickness.
期刊介绍:
Mechanics regulates biological processes at the molecular, cellular, tissue, organ, and organism levels. A goal of this journal is to promote basic and applied research that integrates the expanding knowledge-bases in the allied fields of biomechanics and mechanobiology. Approaches may be experimental, theoretical, or computational; they may address phenomena at the nano, micro, or macrolevels. Of particular interest are investigations that
(1) quantify the mechanical environment in which cells and matrix function in health, disease, or injury,
(2) identify and quantify mechanosensitive responses and their mechanisms,
(3) detail inter-relations between mechanics and biological processes such as growth, remodeling, adaptation, and repair, and
(4) report discoveries that advance therapeutic and diagnostic procedures.
Especially encouraged are analytical and computational models based on solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, or thermomechanics, and their interactions; also encouraged are reports of new experimental methods that expand measurement capabilities and new mathematical methods that facilitate analysis.