Associations Between Personal Values and Regulatory Focus: A Partial Replication for Basic Values and an Extension to Refined Values

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Karl-Andrew Woltin, Joanne Sneddon
{"title":"Associations Between Personal Values and Regulatory Focus: A Partial Replication for Basic Values and an Extension to Refined Values","authors":"Karl-Andrew Woltin,&nbsp;Joanne Sneddon","doi":"10.1002/ejsp.3157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Together, human values (trans-situational goals) and self-regulatory focus on promotion versus prevention (aspirations/gains vs. obligations/losses reference standards) provide a more complete view of human motivation. Scarce previous work with relatively small samples associated these motivational systems to each other but provided mixed results. Following previous studies, we examined associations between self-regulatory focus on promotion versus prevention and the 10 <i>basic</i> values (<i>N</i><sub>joint_samples</sub> = 1035). Additionally, we examined associations between promotion and prevention focus and the 20 <i>refined</i> values (<i>N</i><sub>joint_samples</sub> = 2779). Replicating past work, prevention was positively (negatively) associated with conservation (openness-to-change) values. Unlike in previous work, promotion was positively associated with most openness-to-change values (self-direction—thought, stimulation and less consistently also hedonism) and negatively associated with most conservation values (security—societal, conformity—interpersonal, face and less consistently also tradition). Regarding self-transcendence versus self-enhancement values, no systematic associations (universalism, humility) or associations contradicting past work emerged, with <i>both</i> foci being differently associated with achievement and positively (negatively) associated with benevolence (power).</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48377,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"55 4","pages":"661-679"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.3157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Together, human values (trans-situational goals) and self-regulatory focus on promotion versus prevention (aspirations/gains vs. obligations/losses reference standards) provide a more complete view of human motivation. Scarce previous work with relatively small samples associated these motivational systems to each other but provided mixed results. Following previous studies, we examined associations between self-regulatory focus on promotion versus prevention and the 10 basic values (Njoint_samples = 1035). Additionally, we examined associations between promotion and prevention focus and the 20 refined values (Njoint_samples = 2779). Replicating past work, prevention was positively (negatively) associated with conservation (openness-to-change) values. Unlike in previous work, promotion was positively associated with most openness-to-change values (self-direction—thought, stimulation and less consistently also hedonism) and negatively associated with most conservation values (security—societal, conformity—interpersonal, face and less consistently also tradition). Regarding self-transcendence versus self-enhancement values, no systematic associations (universalism, humility) or associations contradicting past work emerged, with both foci being differently associated with achievement and positively (negatively) associated with benevolence (power).

个人价值观与监管焦点的关系:基本价值观的部分复制及其对精炼价值观的延伸
人类价值观(跨情境目标)和关注促进与预防的自我调节(愿望/收益与义务/损失参考标准)共同提供了对人类动机的更完整的看法。以前很少有相对小样本的研究将这些激励系统相互联系起来,但结果好坏参半。根据先前的研究,我们研究了自我调节关注促进与预防与10个基本值之间的关系(Njoint_samples = 1035)。此外,我们检查了促进和预防焦点与20个精炼值之间的关系(Njoint_samples = 2779)。重复过去的工作,预防与保护(开放变化)价值呈正(负)相关。与之前的研究不同的是,晋升与大多数开放改变价值观(自我导向思想、刺激和不太一致的享乐主义)呈正相关,与大多数保守价值观(安全-社会、顺从-人际、面子和不太一致的传统)负相关。关于自我超越与自我提升的价值观,没有系统的关联(普遍主义、谦卑)或与过去的工作相矛盾的关联出现,这两个焦点与成就有不同的关联,与仁慈(权力)有积极(消极)的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Topics covered include, among others, intergroup relations, group processes, social cognition, attitudes, social influence and persuasion, self and identity, verbal and nonverbal communication, language and thought, affect and emotion, embodied and situated cognition and individual differences of social-psychological relevance. Together with original research articles, the European Journal of Social Psychology"s innovative and inclusive style is reflected in the variety of articles published: Research Article: Original articles that provide a significant contribution to the understanding of social phenomena, up to a maximum of 12,000 words in length.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信