Corporate Social Responsibility Expenditure and Financial Performance: The Case of Optional Spending and Mandatory Reporting in India

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting
Smita Mazumdar, Som Sekhar Bhattacharyya, Bala Krishnamoorthy, Sujata Mukherjee, Shailaja Rego
{"title":"Corporate Social Responsibility Expenditure and Financial Performance: The Case of Optional Spending and Mandatory Reporting in India","authors":"Smita Mazumdar,&nbsp;Som Sekhar Bhattacharyya,&nbsp;Bala Krishnamoorthy,&nbsp;Sujata Mukherjee,&nbsp;Shailaja Rego","doi":"10.1002/joe.22291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study examined the correlation between Indian firms’ Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenditure and their financial performance (FFP) using disclosure data from 479 firms between 2014 and 2020. This period was notable for mandatory CSR reporting but optional spending. A panel regression analysis was employed to assess firm behavior from the perspectives of institutional, signaling, and value creation theories. This study found that firms’ CSR expenditure was notably lower than mandated spending in all sectors, except in the energy, material, and consumer-staples sectors. Overall, CSR spending was associated with improved margins, supporting value creation theory. However, the impact varied across industries: the energy, material, industrial, consumer-discretionary, and healthcare sectors exhibited a negative association, whereas the consumer-staples sector showed a significant positive association. Thus, promoting CSR spending in sectors that benefit the most may be more effective than adopting a uniform approach across all sectors. Regulatory bodies should consider developing industry-specific intervention plans to integrate CSR more effectively into mainstream business practices.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":35064,"journal":{"name":"Global Business and Organizational Excellence","volume":"44 5","pages":"57-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Business and Organizational Excellence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joe.22291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the correlation between Indian firms’ Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenditure and their financial performance (FFP) using disclosure data from 479 firms between 2014 and 2020. This period was notable for mandatory CSR reporting but optional spending. A panel regression analysis was employed to assess firm behavior from the perspectives of institutional, signaling, and value creation theories. This study found that firms’ CSR expenditure was notably lower than mandated spending in all sectors, except in the energy, material, and consumer-staples sectors. Overall, CSR spending was associated with improved margins, supporting value creation theory. However, the impact varied across industries: the energy, material, industrial, consumer-discretionary, and healthcare sectors exhibited a negative association, whereas the consumer-staples sector showed a significant positive association. Thus, promoting CSR spending in sectors that benefit the most may be more effective than adopting a uniform approach across all sectors. Regulatory bodies should consider developing industry-specific intervention plans to integrate CSR more effectively into mainstream business practices.

企业社会责任支出与财务绩效:以印度的选择性支出与强制性报告为例
本研究利用2014年至2020年间479家印度公司的披露数据,检验了印度公司的企业社会责任(CSR)支出与财务绩效(FFP)之间的相关性。这一时期的社会责任报告是强制性的,但支出是可选的。采用面板回归分析,从制度、信号和价值创造理论的角度评估企业行为。本研究发现,除了能源、材料和基本消费品行业外,所有行业的企业社会责任支出都明显低于法定支出。总体而言,企业社会责任支出与提高利润率有关,这支持了价值创造理论。然而,影响因行业而异:能源、材料、工业、非必需消费品和医疗保健行业表现出负相关,而必需品行业则表现出显著的正相关。因此,在受益最大的部门促进企业社会责任支出可能比在所有部门采用统一的方法更有效。监管机构应考虑制定针对特定行业的干预计划,将企业社会责任更有效地融入主流商业实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Business and Organizational Excellence
Global Business and Organizational Excellence Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: For leaders and managers in an increasingly globalized world, Global Business and Organizational Excellence (GBOE) offers first-hand case studies of best practices of people in organizations meeting varied challenges of competitiveness, as well as perspectives on strategies, techniques, and knowledge that help such people lead their organizations to excel. GBOE provides its readers with unique insights into how organizations are achieving competitive advantage through transformational leadership--at the top, and in various functions that make up the whole. The focus is always on the people -- how to coordinate, communicate among, organize, reward, teach, learn from, and inspire people who make the important things happen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信