Prototypes of the Ostracized

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Ignazio Ziano, Deming Wang
{"title":"Prototypes of the Ostracized","authors":"Ignazio Ziano,&nbsp;Deming Wang","doi":"10.1002/ejsp.3166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>How do people imagine targets of ostracism? We conducted a multi-method investigation using both open-ended questions and quantitative experiments. Eleven preregistered studies (five main and six supplementary studies with participants from the United States, the United Kingdom and France) showed that people imagine ostracized individuals as socially, psychologically and physically different from the average person. This was shown to have significant consequences—the same act directed at prototypical (vs. counterprototypical and control) targets is more likely to be classified as ostracism, even when people try to ignore target features and focus on the behaviour alone. Prototypical targets are seen as less deserving of being excluded, more hurt and are sympathized with more. Further, people judge alleged ostracizers more negatively and express less interest in affiliating with them when the target fits the prototype. We discuss theoretical implications for the understanding of prototypes and ostracism and practical implications for the detection and curbing of ostracism in everyday life.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48377,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"55 4","pages":"708-726"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.3166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do people imagine targets of ostracism? We conducted a multi-method investigation using both open-ended questions and quantitative experiments. Eleven preregistered studies (five main and six supplementary studies with participants from the United States, the United Kingdom and France) showed that people imagine ostracized individuals as socially, psychologically and physically different from the average person. This was shown to have significant consequences—the same act directed at prototypical (vs. counterprototypical and control) targets is more likely to be classified as ostracism, even when people try to ignore target features and focus on the behaviour alone. Prototypical targets are seen as less deserving of being excluded, more hurt and are sympathized with more. Further, people judge alleged ostracizers more negatively and express less interest in affiliating with them when the target fits the prototype. We discuss theoretical implications for the understanding of prototypes and ostracism and practical implications for the detection and curbing of ostracism in everyday life.

被放逐者的原型
人们如何想象被排斥的对象?我们使用开放式问题和定量实验进行了多方法调查。11项预先登记的研究(参与者来自美国、英国和法国的5项主要研究和6项补充研究)表明,人们认为被排斥的个人在社会、心理和身体上都与普通人不同。这被证明有显著的后果——针对原型(相对于反原型和控制)目标的相同行为更有可能被归类为排斥,即使人们试图忽略目标特征而只关注行为。典型的目标被认为不应该被排除在外,更容易受到伤害,也更容易得到同情。此外,当目标符合原型时,人们会更消极地判断所谓的排斥者,并表示不太愿意与他们交往。我们讨论了理解原型和排斥的理论意义以及在日常生活中发现和遏制排斥的实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Topics covered include, among others, intergroup relations, group processes, social cognition, attitudes, social influence and persuasion, self and identity, verbal and nonverbal communication, language and thought, affect and emotion, embodied and situated cognition and individual differences of social-psychological relevance. Together with original research articles, the European Journal of Social Psychology"s innovative and inclusive style is reflected in the variety of articles published: Research Article: Original articles that provide a significant contribution to the understanding of social phenomena, up to a maximum of 12,000 words in length.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信