Do Solar Eclipses Generate Propagating Ionospheric Perturbations?

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Andrew K. Sun, Hyosub Kil, Hyeyeon Chang, Woo Kyoung Lee, Jiyun Lee
{"title":"Do Solar Eclipses Generate Propagating Ionospheric Perturbations?","authors":"Andrew K. Sun,&nbsp;Hyosub Kil,&nbsp;Hyeyeon Chang,&nbsp;Woo Kyoung Lee,&nbsp;Jiyun Lee","doi":"10.1029/2025JA033746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plasma depletion during a solar eclipse is well-documented, but the generation of other forms of ionospheric perturbations by the impact of eclipses is controversial. This study aims to evaluate the generation of additional ionospheric perturbations through case studies of total solar eclipses observed across the United States on 21 August 2017 and 8 May 2024. Total electron content (TEC) values are used to track ionospheric perturbations along the eclipse paths. When a smoothing filter (Savitzky–Golay filter) is applied to detect ionospheric perturbations, negative TEC perturbations are observed during totality, while positive TEC perturbations are detected around the beginning and end of the eclipses. These perturbations, caused by rapid TEC variations during these periods, are interpreted as filtering artifacts. Quasi-periodic multiple TEC perturbation layers are detected along the eclipse paths when an oscillatory filter (polynomial detrending) is applied. However, as this filter introduces wave-like artifacts during detrending, the resulting patterns do not represent actual TEC perturbations. Based on our observational and test results, we conclude that eclipse-induced ionospheric perturbations beyond the well-documented plasma depletion are not evident because actual eclipse-induced perturbations are not distinguishable from filtering artifacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":15894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","volume":"130 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JA033746","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JA033746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plasma depletion during a solar eclipse is well-documented, but the generation of other forms of ionospheric perturbations by the impact of eclipses is controversial. This study aims to evaluate the generation of additional ionospheric perturbations through case studies of total solar eclipses observed across the United States on 21 August 2017 and 8 May 2024. Total electron content (TEC) values are used to track ionospheric perturbations along the eclipse paths. When a smoothing filter (Savitzky–Golay filter) is applied to detect ionospheric perturbations, negative TEC perturbations are observed during totality, while positive TEC perturbations are detected around the beginning and end of the eclipses. These perturbations, caused by rapid TEC variations during these periods, are interpreted as filtering artifacts. Quasi-periodic multiple TEC perturbation layers are detected along the eclipse paths when an oscillatory filter (polynomial detrending) is applied. However, as this filter introduces wave-like artifacts during detrending, the resulting patterns do not represent actual TEC perturbations. Based on our observational and test results, we conclude that eclipse-induced ionospheric perturbations beyond the well-documented plasma depletion are not evident because actual eclipse-induced perturbations are not distinguishable from filtering artifacts.

Abstract Image

日食会产生传播电离层扰动吗?
在日食期间等离子体耗竭是有据可查的,但是由于日食的影响而产生的其他形式的电离层扰动是有争议的。本研究旨在通过对2017年8月21日和2024年5月8日在美国观测到的日全食的案例研究来评估额外电离层扰动的产生。总电子含量(TEC)值用于跟踪沿日食路径的电离层扰动。当使用平滑滤波器(Savitzky-Golay滤波器)来检测电离层扰动时,在全食期间观察到负的TEC扰动,而在日食开始和结束时检测到正的TEC扰动。这些扰动是由这些时期的快速TEC变化引起的,被解释为过滤伪影。当采用振荡滤波器(多项式去趋势)时,沿日食路径检测到准周期多重TEC扰动层。然而,由于该滤波器在去趋势过程中引入了类似波的伪影,因此产生的模式并不代表实际的TEC扰动。根据我们的观测和测试结果,我们得出结论,日食引起的电离层扰动超出了充分记录的等离子体耗竭并不明显,因为实际的日食引起的扰动与过滤伪影无法区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
35.70%
发文量
570
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信