Starting New Dialogue: The Enduring Concepts of Virginia Satir's Human Validation Process Model

Abstract

Given the breadth and depth of resources related to Virginia Satir's Human Validation Process Model (HVPM), it may be difficult for clinicians to know where to begin when learning this model. The present study aims to create a conceptual framework of this model to lay the groundwork for future effectiveness research and to help clinicians gain an initial understanding of the model. Since the study aims to refine, expand, and evaluate theory, deductive qualitative analysis was used to merge data from three sources across three phases. In the first phase, the authors reviewed primary sources and synthesised existing literature on the model. Next, videos of Virginia Satir using the model were coded. Finally, interviews with experts on the model were conducted to validate and finalise the conceptual framework. The results of this study contribute to the scarcity of empirical studies on the HVPM. Further, the conceptual framework is a resource for student clinicians and supervisors that highlights the stages of treatment, key concepts, and interventions in a clear way. Results provide a starting point for further empirical research and teaching of the model.