M. Wendt, S. Nandke, P. Scharschmidt, M. Thielicke, J. Ahlborn, M. Heiermann, F. Eulenstein
{"title":"Prediction of the Methane Yield From Extensively Managed, Flower-Rich Fen Grassland Based on NIRS Data","authors":"M. Wendt, S. Nandke, P. Scharschmidt, M. Thielicke, J. Ahlborn, M. Heiermann, F. Eulenstein","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In many regions of Europe, biogas production is an integral part of farming to generate methane as a sustainable and versatile renewable energy carrier. Besides providing feedstock for ruminants and energy production, grasslands support multiple beneficial ecosystem services, namely diverse flora and habitats that serve as resources for pollinators. The cost-effective utilization of grassland biomass is mainly determined by the biomass quality, which is highly variable and dependent on the management intensities. Besides chemical analyses, biogas models are usually applied to predict the biogas yield of a specific biomass type and quality. However, available models do not apply to mixed grass stands as they primarily refer to individual grass species and/or are just based on single parameters such as lignin. In this work, we evaluated flower-rich extensive fen grassland for its biogas yield using a newly created model based on common chemical parameters. Therefore, flower-rich biomass from a cultivation experiment (<i>n</i> = 48) was analyzed for its biomass yield (average 9.43 ± 1.26 <i>t</i><sub>VS</sub> × ha<sup>−1</sup>), chemical composition by wet chemical analysis and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), specific methane yield (SMY) potential via batch tests, and methane hectare yield (1505.62 ± 282.86 m<sup>3</sup><sub>N</sub> × ha<sup>−1</sup>). In the results obtained, we found flower-rich grassland biomass characterized by high fiber (30.1% ± 1.7%) and high protein content (11.3% ± 1.3%) with reliable determinability of chemical composition by NIRS. The most important predictors on SMY assessed by multiple linear regression were crude ash (XA), crude protein (XP), amylase neutral detergent fiber (aNDF<sub>vs</sub>), acid detergent fiber (ADF<sub>vs</sub>), and enzyme-resistant organic matter (EROM). We conclude that extensive flower-rich grassland biomass composed of diverse species and different growth and ripening stages provides a suitable feedstock for biogas production despite late harvest dates. NIRS proved capable of analyzing the biomass quality of flower-rich grassland and thus contributes to optimizing grassland management strategies and provision of demand-driven feedstock qualities.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70046","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In many regions of Europe, biogas production is an integral part of farming to generate methane as a sustainable and versatile renewable energy carrier. Besides providing feedstock for ruminants and energy production, grasslands support multiple beneficial ecosystem services, namely diverse flora and habitats that serve as resources for pollinators. The cost-effective utilization of grassland biomass is mainly determined by the biomass quality, which is highly variable and dependent on the management intensities. Besides chemical analyses, biogas models are usually applied to predict the biogas yield of a specific biomass type and quality. However, available models do not apply to mixed grass stands as they primarily refer to individual grass species and/or are just based on single parameters such as lignin. In this work, we evaluated flower-rich extensive fen grassland for its biogas yield using a newly created model based on common chemical parameters. Therefore, flower-rich biomass from a cultivation experiment (n = 48) was analyzed for its biomass yield (average 9.43 ± 1.26 tVS × ha−1), chemical composition by wet chemical analysis and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), specific methane yield (SMY) potential via batch tests, and methane hectare yield (1505.62 ± 282.86 m3N × ha−1). In the results obtained, we found flower-rich grassland biomass characterized by high fiber (30.1% ± 1.7%) and high protein content (11.3% ± 1.3%) with reliable determinability of chemical composition by NIRS. The most important predictors on SMY assessed by multiple linear regression were crude ash (XA), crude protein (XP), amylase neutral detergent fiber (aNDFvs), acid detergent fiber (ADFvs), and enzyme-resistant organic matter (EROM). We conclude that extensive flower-rich grassland biomass composed of diverse species and different growth and ripening stages provides a suitable feedstock for biogas production despite late harvest dates. NIRS proved capable of analyzing the biomass quality of flower-rich grassland and thus contributes to optimizing grassland management strategies and provision of demand-driven feedstock qualities.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.