The British Museum and the Abyssinian Campaign, 1867–8

IF 0.6 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
History Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1111/1468-229X.13439
ZOE CORMACK
{"title":"The British Museum and the Abyssinian Campaign, 1867–8","authors":"ZOE CORMACK","doi":"10.1111/1468-229X.13439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 1867–8, the British Museum sent a staff member on the Abyssinian Campaign. Richard Holmes, an assistant in the Manuscript Department, was embedded in the military invasion and looted important and sacred objects and manuscripts from the fortress of Emperor Tewodros II at Maqdala. This is one of the most significant examples of a museum colluding in colonial violence to gain objects for its collection. The article re-examines the case of Holmes, drawing on new research in the British Museum's archive and with important primary documents that have not yet received scholarly attention. The analysis focuses on the museum's objectives for the Campaign, the planning process and the actions of Holmes. I argue that while the museum was complicit in the violence perpetrated at Maqdala, its relationship with the military was complex. Multiple competing agendas became increasingly apparent as the actions of Holmes were progressively militarised. The article also examines the wider institutional links to the Abyssinian Campaign, including close political relationships that are important for understanding the trajectory of events and history of the British Museum's collections. More broadly, it sheds new light on the relationship between museums and colonial-military interventions in nineteenth-century Africa, demonstrating the tensions that were inherent in these projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":13162,"journal":{"name":"History","volume":"110 391","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-229X.13439","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-229X.13439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1867–8, the British Museum sent a staff member on the Abyssinian Campaign. Richard Holmes, an assistant in the Manuscript Department, was embedded in the military invasion and looted important and sacred objects and manuscripts from the fortress of Emperor Tewodros II at Maqdala. This is one of the most significant examples of a museum colluding in colonial violence to gain objects for its collection. The article re-examines the case of Holmes, drawing on new research in the British Museum's archive and with important primary documents that have not yet received scholarly attention. The analysis focuses on the museum's objectives for the Campaign, the planning process and the actions of Holmes. I argue that while the museum was complicit in the violence perpetrated at Maqdala, its relationship with the military was complex. Multiple competing agendas became increasingly apparent as the actions of Holmes were progressively militarised. The article also examines the wider institutional links to the Abyssinian Campaign, including close political relationships that are important for understanding the trajectory of events and history of the British Museum's collections. More broadly, it sheds new light on the relationship between museums and colonial-military interventions in nineteenth-century Africa, demonstrating the tensions that were inherent in these projects.

大英博物馆与阿比西尼亚战役(1867 - 1868
1867 - 1868年,大英博物馆派了一名工作人员参加阿比西尼亚战役。手稿部助理理查德·霍姆斯(Richard Holmes)参与了军事入侵,并从皇帝特沃德罗斯二世(Tewodros II)在Maqdala的堡垒中抢劫了重要的圣物和手稿。这是博物馆勾结殖民暴力以获取藏品的最重要例子之一。这篇文章重新审视了福尔摩斯的案例,借鉴了大英博物馆档案中的新研究成果,以及尚未得到学术界关注的重要原始文件。分析的重点是博物馆的运动目标,规划过程和福尔摩斯的行动。我认为,虽然博物馆与发生在麦达拉的暴力事件串通一气,但它与军方的关系很复杂。随着福尔摩斯的行动逐渐军事化,多个相互竞争的议程变得越来越明显。本文还考察了与阿比西尼亚战役更广泛的机构联系,包括密切的政治关系,这对理解事件的轨迹和大英博物馆藏品的历史很重要。更广泛地说,它揭示了博物馆与19世纪非洲殖民军事干预之间的关系,展示了这些项目中固有的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History
History HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: First published in 1912, History has been a leader in its field ever since. It is unique in its range and variety, packing its pages with stimulating articles and extensive book reviews. History balances its broad chronological coverage with a wide geographical spread of articles featuring contributions from social, political, cultural, economic and ecclesiastical historians. History seeks to publish articles on broad, challenging themes, which not only display sound scholarship which is embedded within current historiographical debates, but push those debates forward. History encourages submissions which are also attractively and clearly written. Reviews: An integral part of each issue is the review section giving critical analysis of the latest scholarship across an extensive chronological and geographical range.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信