“I Just Need to Say Something”: A Self-Determination Model of Voice

IF 6.2 2区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Journal of Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1002/job.2868

Andrew Li, Dejun Tony Kong, Zhiqing E. Zhou, Craig Crossley, Quan Lin

{"title":"“I Just Need to Say Something”: A Self-Determination Model of Voice","authors":"Andrew Li, Dejun Tony Kong, Zhiqing E. Zhou, Craig Crossley, Quan Lin","doi":"10.1002/job.2868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Existing voice research tends to focus on the positive outcomes associated with promotive voice and the negative outcomes associated with prohibitive voice. We adopt a self-determination theoretical lens to examine what voicers stand to gain by engaging in both types of voice despite the potential backlash against them for their voice behavior (particularly prohibitive voice). We conducted two experience-sampling studies that examined the fluctuation of voice on a daily (Study 1) and weekly (Study 2) basis. In Study 1, we found that while promotive voice was positively associated with the voicer's psychological need satisfaction, prohibitive voice was not. In addition, the association between promotive voice and the voicer's psychological need satisfaction was stronger than that of prohibitive voice and the voicer's psychological need satisfaction. In Study 2, we found that both promotive voice and prohibitive voice were indirectly related to the voicer's authentic self-expression and helping behavior through the mediating mechanism of psychological need satisfaction, although the indirect effects of promotive voice were stronger than the indirect effects of prohibitive voice.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":"46 5","pages":"789-811"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.2868","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing voice research tends to focus on the positive outcomes associated with promotive voice and the negative outcomes associated with prohibitive voice. We adopt a self-determination theoretical lens to examine what voicers stand to gain by engaging in both types of voice despite the potential backlash against them for their voice behavior (particularly prohibitive voice). We conducted two experience-sampling studies that examined the fluctuation of voice on a daily (Study 1) and weekly (Study 2) basis. In Study 1, we found that while promotive voice was positively associated with the voicer's psychological need satisfaction, prohibitive voice was not. In addition, the association between promotive voice and the voicer's psychological need satisfaction was stronger than that of prohibitive voice and the voicer's psychological need satisfaction. In Study 2, we found that both promotive voice and prohibitive voice were indirectly related to the voicer's authentic self-expression and helping behavior through the mediating mechanism of psychological need satisfaction, although the indirect effects of promotive voice were stronger than the indirect effects of prohibitive voice.

查看原文本刊更多论文

“我只是需要说点什么”：声音的自我决定模式

现有的语音研究倾向于关注促进性语音的积极结果和抑制性语音的消极结果。我们采用自我决定的理论视角来研究发声者通过参与这两种类型的声音来获得什么，尽管他们的发声行为（特别是禁止的声音）可能会遭到强烈反对。我们进行了两项经验抽样研究，分别在每天（研究1）和每周（研究2）的基础上检查声音的波动。在研究1中，我们发现促进性声音与发声者的心理需求满足呈正相关，而禁止性声音与之无关。此外，促进性发声与发声者心理需求满意度的相关性强于禁止性发声与发声者心理需求满意度的相关性。在研究2中，我们发现促进性声音和禁止性声音都通过心理需求满足的中介机制与发声者的真实自我表达和帮助行为存在间接关联，尽管促进性声音的间接效应强于禁止性声音的间接效应。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Organizational Behavior Multiple-

CiteScore

10.50

自引率

5.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to publish empirical reports and theoretical reviews of research in the field of organizational behavior, wherever in the world that work is conducted. The journal will focus on research and theory in all topics associated with organizational behavior within and across individual, group and organizational levels of analysis, including: -At the individual level: personality, perception, beliefs, attitudes, values, motivation, career behavior, stress, emotions, judgment, and commitment. -At the group level: size, composition, structure, leadership, power, group affect, and politics. -At the organizational level: structure, change, goal-setting, creativity, and human resource management policies and practices. -Across levels: decision-making, performance, job satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism, diversity, careers and career development, equal opportunities, work-life balance, identification, organizational culture and climate, inter-organizational processes, and multi-national and cross-national issues. -Research methodologies in studies of organizational behavior.