Decoding Cropland Mask Effects on the Explanatory Power of Remote Sensing and Reanalyzed Climate Data on Yield Anomalies in Africa

IF 7.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Earths Future Pub Date : 2025-06-04 DOI:10.1029/2024EF005443
Wanxue Zhu, Ting Yang, Jundong Wang, Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei
{"title":"Decoding Cropland Mask Effects on the Explanatory Power of Remote Sensing and Reanalyzed Climate Data on Yield Anomalies in Africa","authors":"Wanxue Zhu,&nbsp;Ting Yang,&nbsp;Jundong Wang,&nbsp;Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei","doi":"10.1029/2024EF005443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ensuring crop yield stability is crucial for food security in Africa, where agriculture faces increasing food demand amid considerable vulnerabilities. Remote sensing and reanalyzed data products offer the potential for capturing crop growth dynamics and understanding their drivers. However, the impacts of cropland masks on relative yield anomalies (RYA) and the contributions of variables across Africa and crops remain unclear. This study explores the explanatory power of air and land surface temperatures (AT and LST), precipitation, evapotranspiration, and soil moisture on maize, millet, and sorghum RYA in Africa for 2001–2020 under seven cropland masks with distinct configurations for temporal, crop type, and water supply systems. Results indicate that (a) North Africa was particularly affected by soil moisture variation and evapotranspiration, West Africa was strongly impacted by precipitation, Central and East Africa were highly influenced by mean AT and total precipitation, and South Africa was mainly affected by high LST, mean evapotranspiration, and precipitation variation. (b) Interactions between precipitation and LST improved the explanatory power of the multiple stepwise regression model from 67% to 73%, while that of the random forest model considering complex variable interactions reached 83%. (c) Variables with high contributions were less impacted by the choice of masks. Mask configurations with broader crop coverage compensated for the limitations of temporally static masks, while crop type identification enhanced explanatory power when using year-specific and crop-specific maps. Future research should integrate process-based crop models to better understand the mechanisms behind the diverse drivers of yield at the regional scale in Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EF005443","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EF005443","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ensuring crop yield stability is crucial for food security in Africa, where agriculture faces increasing food demand amid considerable vulnerabilities. Remote sensing and reanalyzed data products offer the potential for capturing crop growth dynamics and understanding their drivers. However, the impacts of cropland masks on relative yield anomalies (RYA) and the contributions of variables across Africa and crops remain unclear. This study explores the explanatory power of air and land surface temperatures (AT and LST), precipitation, evapotranspiration, and soil moisture on maize, millet, and sorghum RYA in Africa for 2001–2020 under seven cropland masks with distinct configurations for temporal, crop type, and water supply systems. Results indicate that (a) North Africa was particularly affected by soil moisture variation and evapotranspiration, West Africa was strongly impacted by precipitation, Central and East Africa were highly influenced by mean AT and total precipitation, and South Africa was mainly affected by high LST, mean evapotranspiration, and precipitation variation. (b) Interactions between precipitation and LST improved the explanatory power of the multiple stepwise regression model from 67% to 73%, while that of the random forest model considering complex variable interactions reached 83%. (c) Variables with high contributions were less impacted by the choice of masks. Mask configurations with broader crop coverage compensated for the limitations of temporally static masks, while crop type identification enhanced explanatory power when using year-specific and crop-specific maps. Future research should integrate process-based crop models to better understand the mechanisms behind the diverse drivers of yield at the regional scale in Africa.

解码农田掩膜效应对遥感和再分析气候数据对非洲产量异常的解释力
确保作物产量稳定对非洲的粮食安全至关重要,非洲的农业面临着日益增长的粮食需求,同时也面临着相当大的脆弱性。遥感和再分析数据产品提供了捕捉作物生长动态和了解其驱动因素的潜力。然而,农田掩膜对相对产量异常(RYA)的影响以及非洲和作物各变量的贡献仍不清楚。本研究探讨了2001-2020年非洲7个具有不同时间、作物类型和供水系统配置的农田掩膜下,空气和地表温度(AT和LST)、降水、蒸散发和土壤水分对玉米、谷子和高粱RYA的解释力。结果表明:(a)北非受土壤水分变化和蒸散发的影响最大,西非受降水的影响较大,中非和东非受平均AT和总降水的影响较大,南非主要受高地表温度、平均蒸散发和降水变化的影响。(b)降水与地表温度的相互作用使多元逐步回归模型的解释能力从67%提高到73%,而考虑复杂变量相互作用的随机森林模型的解释能力达到83%。(c)贡献高的变量受选择掩码的影响较小。具有更广泛作物覆盖的掩膜配置弥补了暂时静态掩膜的局限性,而作物类型识别在使用特定年份和特定作物地图时增强了解释力。未来的研究应该整合基于过程的作物模型,以便更好地理解非洲区域尺度上不同产量驱动因素背后的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earths Future
Earths Future ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDI-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
260
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信