Assessing Flood Mitigation Preparedness in Nebraska's Rural Communities Through Local Comprehensive Plans

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Risha Singh, Jenny B. Mason, Jahangeer Jahangeer, Jiyoung Lee, Jesse Andrews, Rao Nargis Jahan, Md Asaduzzaman Noor, Yunwoo Nam, Yuhan Jiang, Zhenghong Tang
{"title":"Assessing Flood Mitigation Preparedness in Nebraska's Rural Communities Through Local Comprehensive Plans","authors":"Risha Singh,&nbsp;Jenny B. Mason,&nbsp;Jahangeer Jahangeer,&nbsp;Jiyoung Lee,&nbsp;Jesse Andrews,&nbsp;Rao Nargis Jahan,&nbsp;Md Asaduzzaman Noor,&nbsp;Yunwoo Nam,&nbsp;Yuhan Jiang,&nbsp;Zhenghong Tang","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the United States, research to date has primarily focused on mitigating urban coastal flood risks, with limited knowledge available on the planning capacity and effectiveness of flood mitigation in rural inland areas. This study addresses the gap by analyzing 162 publicly accessible local comprehensive plans from local jurisdictions across Nebraska, evaluating their preparedness for managing floodplains and reducing flood risks. The research examines how well Nebraska's communities, particularly rural ones, are prepared for flood risk reduction and whether they have adopted more proactive measures following the historic 2019 flood disaster. The evaluation criteria focus on three key areas: <i>vulnerability assessment</i>, <i>policy toolkits</i>, and <i>coordination mechanisms</i>. The findings reveal a mix of strengths and weaknesses across these categories. Overall, vulnerability assessment is generally low, with a score of 26.7%, indicating limited awareness and inadequate use of federal and state floodplain datasets to support rural planning. Policy toolkits, scoring 58.7%, are moderately available, suggesting that local communities have taken broader steps to address local flood risk reduction. Coordination mechanisms are relatively well-established within local planning frameworks as found in 74.5% of the plans, showing promise for collaborative flood risk reduction efforts. In rural communities, particularly, the quality of plans is lower compared to urban communities. However, following the 2019 floods, rural communities have shown some improvement in enhancing floodplain management and planning. This research contributes to resilience planning theories, particularly for resource-limited and disadvantaged rural communities in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70082","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the United States, research to date has primarily focused on mitigating urban coastal flood risks, with limited knowledge available on the planning capacity and effectiveness of flood mitigation in rural inland areas. This study addresses the gap by analyzing 162 publicly accessible local comprehensive plans from local jurisdictions across Nebraska, evaluating their preparedness for managing floodplains and reducing flood risks. The research examines how well Nebraska's communities, particularly rural ones, are prepared for flood risk reduction and whether they have adopted more proactive measures following the historic 2019 flood disaster. The evaluation criteria focus on three key areas: vulnerability assessment, policy toolkits, and coordination mechanisms. The findings reveal a mix of strengths and weaknesses across these categories. Overall, vulnerability assessment is generally low, with a score of 26.7%, indicating limited awareness and inadequate use of federal and state floodplain datasets to support rural planning. Policy toolkits, scoring 58.7%, are moderately available, suggesting that local communities have taken broader steps to address local flood risk reduction. Coordination mechanisms are relatively well-established within local planning frameworks as found in 74.5% of the plans, showing promise for collaborative flood risk reduction efforts. In rural communities, particularly, the quality of plans is lower compared to urban communities. However, following the 2019 floods, rural communities have shown some improvement in enhancing floodplain management and planning. This research contributes to resilience planning theories, particularly for resource-limited and disadvantaged rural communities in the United States.

通过地方综合计划评估内布拉斯加州农村社区的防洪准备工作
在美国,迄今为止的研究主要集中于减轻城市沿海洪水风险,对内陆农村地区减轻洪水的规划能力和有效性了解有限。本研究通过分析来自内布拉斯加州各地的162个可公开获取的地方综合计划,评估其管理洪泛平原和降低洪水风险的准备情况,解决了这一差距。该研究考察了内布拉斯加州的社区,特别是农村社区,为降低洪水风险做好了多少准备,以及在2019年历史性的洪水灾害之后,他们是否采取了更积极的措施。评估标准集中在三个关键领域:脆弱性评估、政策工具包和协调机制。研究结果揭示了这些类别的优点和缺点。总体而言,脆弱性评估总体较低,得分为26.7%,表明联邦和州洪泛区数据集在支持农村规划方面的认识有限,使用不足。政策工具包得分为58.7%,可用性一般,表明当地社区已经采取了更广泛的措施来解决当地减少洪水风险的问题。在74.5%的规划中,地方规划框架内的协调机制相对完善,显示出合作减少洪水风险的希望。特别是在农村社区,与城市社区相比,规划的质量较低。然而,在2019年的洪水之后,农村社区在加强洪泛区管理和规划方面取得了一些进展。这项研究有助于弹性规划理论,特别是在美国的资源有限和弱势农村社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信