Effects of sample storage conditions on agricultural soil bacterial diversity and functionality

IF 4.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Sara Del Duca , Cristina Aponte , Carmen Trasar-Cepeda , Francesco Vitali , Antonia Esposito , Roberta Pastorelli , Gilberto Bragato , Flavio Fornasier , Markéta Sagova-Mareckova , Marjetka Suhadolc , Stefano Mocali
{"title":"Effects of sample storage conditions on agricultural soil bacterial diversity and functionality","authors":"Sara Del Duca ,&nbsp;Cristina Aponte ,&nbsp;Carmen Trasar-Cepeda ,&nbsp;Francesco Vitali ,&nbsp;Antonia Esposito ,&nbsp;Roberta Pastorelli ,&nbsp;Gilberto Bragato ,&nbsp;Flavio Fornasier ,&nbsp;Markéta Sagova-Mareckova ,&nbsp;Marjetka Suhadolc ,&nbsp;Stefano Mocali","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Archived soil series provide valuable opportunities to assess microbial temporal dynamics, which are essential for identifying appropriate soil management practices. However, the soil microbiome is usually studied using cryopreserved fresh soils, while almost all archived soils are dry and stored at room temperature. The aims of the present study were to i) evaluate potential differences in the soil bacterial community composition and enzymatic activity between dry-stored and frozen samples, and ii) assess whether the storage method influences the capacity to detect microbial differences related to environmental factors.</div><div>Soil samples were obtained from two long-term experiments with different tillage intensities, collected in 2011/2012 and 2022, and stored under both frozen and dry conditions. Bacterial community composition was assessed using high-throughput sequencing, while enzymatic activity was analyzed through biochemical assays.</div><div>The results showed that bacterial community composition and enzymatic activity were significantly influenced by the storage method. Additionally, the effect of storage duration was observed by comparing the concordance between data from frozen and dry samples collected in 2011/2012 (long-term storage) and in 2022 (short-term storage). Nonetheless, the analysis of the impact of environmental factors (e.g., tillage) on the bacterial and enzymatic profiles of the samples revealed a consistency between dry and frozen samples. This suggests that storage conditions did not compromise the ability to detect biological differences associated with management practices. Further studies on a broader set of soil samples are needed to confirm these findings and to support the use of dry soil samples for microbiological analyses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 106218"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325003567","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Archived soil series provide valuable opportunities to assess microbial temporal dynamics, which are essential for identifying appropriate soil management practices. However, the soil microbiome is usually studied using cryopreserved fresh soils, while almost all archived soils are dry and stored at room temperature. The aims of the present study were to i) evaluate potential differences in the soil bacterial community composition and enzymatic activity between dry-stored and frozen samples, and ii) assess whether the storage method influences the capacity to detect microbial differences related to environmental factors.
Soil samples were obtained from two long-term experiments with different tillage intensities, collected in 2011/2012 and 2022, and stored under both frozen and dry conditions. Bacterial community composition was assessed using high-throughput sequencing, while enzymatic activity was analyzed through biochemical assays.
The results showed that bacterial community composition and enzymatic activity were significantly influenced by the storage method. Additionally, the effect of storage duration was observed by comparing the concordance between data from frozen and dry samples collected in 2011/2012 (long-term storage) and in 2022 (short-term storage). Nonetheless, the analysis of the impact of environmental factors (e.g., tillage) on the bacterial and enzymatic profiles of the samples revealed a consistency between dry and frozen samples. This suggests that storage conditions did not compromise the ability to detect biological differences associated with management practices. Further studies on a broader set of soil samples are needed to confirm these findings and to support the use of dry soil samples for microbiological analyses.
样品保存条件对农业土壤细菌多样性和功能的影响
存档的土壤系列为评估微生物时间动态提供了宝贵的机会,这对于确定适当的土壤管理措施至关重要。然而,土壤微生物群的研究通常使用冷冻保存的新鲜土壤,而几乎所有存档的土壤都是干燥的,并在室温下储存。本研究的目的是:1)评估干燥和冷冻样品在土壤细菌群落组成和酶活性方面的潜在差异;2)评估储存方法是否会影响检测与环境因素相关的微生物差异的能力。土壤样品采集于2011/2012年和2022年,分别在冷冻和干燥条件下进行两次不同耕作强度的长期试验。通过高通量测序评估细菌群落组成,通过生化分析分析酶活性。结果表明,不同贮藏方式对细菌群落组成和酶活性有显著影响。此外,通过比较2011/2012年(长期储存)和2022年(短期储存)收集的冷冻和干燥样品数据的一致性,观察了储存时间的影响。尽管如此,对环境因素(如耕作)对样品细菌和酶谱的影响的分析显示,干燥样品和冷冻样品之间存在一致性。这表明,储存条件不会影响检测与管理实践相关的生物差异的能力。需要对更广泛的土壤样本进行进一步研究,以证实这些发现,并支持使用干燥土壤样本进行微生物分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信