Tracking soil moisture dynamics with Vis-NIR spectroscopy during laboratory bare-soil evaporation

IF 6.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Serra L. Kühn , Sascha C. Iden , Friederike Kästner , Magdalena Sut-Lohmann
{"title":"Tracking soil moisture dynamics with Vis-NIR spectroscopy during laboratory bare-soil evaporation","authors":"Serra L. Kühn ,&nbsp;Sascha C. Iden ,&nbsp;Friederike Kästner ,&nbsp;Magdalena Sut-Lohmann","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Numerous studies have investigated the relationship between spectral signal and soil moisture in the laboratory, usually using data from soil samples with predefined moisture levels for model calibration. However, it remains untested whether spectral monitoring can accurately capture the dynamic moisture changes occurring at the soil surface during drying. We conducted evaporation experiments on 5 cm tall packed soil columns of two soil types (sand and silt loam). The surface water content of each soil column was assessed by repeatedly recording spectra in the visible, near infrared, and shortwave infrared domain using an ASD Fieldspec® Pro spectrometer (350–2500 nm). The inferred water contents were then compared to those obtained from a numerical simulation with the Richards equation, which used soil hydraulic properties determined with the simplified evaporation method and measured evaporation rates as boundary condition. To develop the spectral model, samples with defined water contents were independently analyzed with the ASD. Among the three tested spectral models (polynomial linear regression, principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR)), the best model performance was achieved by polynomial linear regression. Regarding the transient evaporation experiments, the spectral model led to generally lower surface water contents than those predicted by the Richards equation. While soil moisture estimates for the silt loam closely matched simulated values (mean error = 2.81 vol%), the sandy soil exhibited systematic underestimations (mean error = 7.13 vol%), likely due to factors related to measurement setup and contact probe placement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"459 ","pages":"Article 117368"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001670612500206X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous studies have investigated the relationship between spectral signal and soil moisture in the laboratory, usually using data from soil samples with predefined moisture levels for model calibration. However, it remains untested whether spectral monitoring can accurately capture the dynamic moisture changes occurring at the soil surface during drying. We conducted evaporation experiments on 5 cm tall packed soil columns of two soil types (sand and silt loam). The surface water content of each soil column was assessed by repeatedly recording spectra in the visible, near infrared, and shortwave infrared domain using an ASD Fieldspec® Pro spectrometer (350–2500 nm). The inferred water contents were then compared to those obtained from a numerical simulation with the Richards equation, which used soil hydraulic properties determined with the simplified evaporation method and measured evaporation rates as boundary condition. To develop the spectral model, samples with defined water contents were independently analyzed with the ASD. Among the three tested spectral models (polynomial linear regression, principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR)), the best model performance was achieved by polynomial linear regression. Regarding the transient evaporation experiments, the spectral model led to generally lower surface water contents than those predicted by the Richards equation. While soil moisture estimates for the silt loam closely matched simulated values (mean error = 2.81 vol%), the sandy soil exhibited systematic underestimations (mean error = 7.13 vol%), likely due to factors related to measurement setup and contact probe placement.
利用可见光-近红外光谱技术跟踪实验室裸土蒸发过程中的土壤水分动态
许多研究在实验室中调查了光谱信号与土壤湿度之间的关系,通常使用具有预定义湿度水平的土壤样品数据进行模型校准。然而,光谱监测能否准确捕捉干燥过程中土壤表面水分的动态变化还有待检验。在沙土和粉砂壤土两种土壤类型的5 cm高填土柱上进行蒸发试验。使用ASD Fieldspec®Pro光谱仪(350-2500 nm)在可见光、近红外和短波红外域反复记录光谱,评估每个土壤柱的地表水含量。然后将推断出的含水量与Richards方程的数值模拟结果进行比较,Richards方程以简化蒸发法确定的土壤水力特性和测量的蒸发速率作为边界条件。为了建立光谱模型,用ASD独立分析了确定含水量的样品。在三种检验的光谱模型(多项式线性回归、主成分回归和偏最小二乘回归)中,多项式线性回归的模型性能最好。在瞬态蒸发实验中,光谱模型得到的地表水含量普遍低于Richards方程的预测值。淤泥质壤土的土壤水分估算值与模拟值非常接近(平均误差= 2.81 vol%),而沙质土则表现出系统性低估(平均误差= 7.13 vol%),这可能是由于测量设置和接触探针放置相关因素所致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信