Cadaver dissection and biohazard risks under the specter of bioethics

Q3 Medicine
M. Pettiti , L. Nogueira , L. Lupi , O. Hamel
{"title":"Cadaver dissection and biohazard risks under the specter of bioethics","authors":"M. Pettiti ,&nbsp;L. Nogueira ,&nbsp;L. Lupi ,&nbsp;O. Hamel","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of fresh, unembalmed specimens is an essential source for anatomy laboratories in France, and raises the preliminary question of the biological risks associated with their handling. In the context of anatomical work, this exposure is major and the risk concerns all recipients of cadavers: anatomists and researchers, as well as students and laboratory technicians, all of whom are required to handle a freshly deceased person. In view of this, we wondered if the regulations governing the body donation for scientific purposes, recently included in the French bioethics laws, have sufficiently taken this risk into account, and what is really the extent of this risk when we explore the literature.</div><div>Data on the prevalence of infections on anatomical models is disparate, dating back to the last century. The persistence of pathogen viability after death, as described in the literature, does not allow us to reach a scientific consensus on the absence of postmortem contagiousness. The lack of obligation to test bodies prior to anatomical work, despite the risks of accidental injury inherent in handling sharp objects or splashing</div><div>human fluids, could lead to infected bodies being made available, without the knowledge of users. The need to incorporate “biological risk prevention” measures linked to anatomical work into the bioethics laws that have governed body donations since 2021 should also be raised, given that the few studies in this field show a wide disparity in the way these risks are understood and managed. Finally, promoting studies to provide solid scientific evidence on the risks of post-mortem transmission of infectious diseases on bodies kept in cold storage for scientific and educational purposes should be encouraged, to provide a clear and definitive answer to the question of post-mortem contagiousness</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of fresh, unembalmed specimens is an essential source for anatomy laboratories in France, and raises the preliminary question of the biological risks associated with their handling. In the context of anatomical work, this exposure is major and the risk concerns all recipients of cadavers: anatomists and researchers, as well as students and laboratory technicians, all of whom are required to handle a freshly deceased person. In view of this, we wondered if the regulations governing the body donation for scientific purposes, recently included in the French bioethics laws, have sufficiently taken this risk into account, and what is really the extent of this risk when we explore the literature.
Data on the prevalence of infections on anatomical models is disparate, dating back to the last century. The persistence of pathogen viability after death, as described in the literature, does not allow us to reach a scientific consensus on the absence of postmortem contagiousness. The lack of obligation to test bodies prior to anatomical work, despite the risks of accidental injury inherent in handling sharp objects or splashing
human fluids, could lead to infected bodies being made available, without the knowledge of users. The need to incorporate “biological risk prevention” measures linked to anatomical work into the bioethics laws that have governed body donations since 2021 should also be raised, given that the few studies in this field show a wide disparity in the way these risks are understood and managed. Finally, promoting studies to provide solid scientific evidence on the risks of post-mortem transmission of infectious diseases on bodies kept in cold storage for scientific and educational purposes should be encouraged, to provide a clear and definitive answer to the question of post-mortem contagiousness
生物伦理下的尸体解剖和生物危害风险
使用新鲜的、未经防腐处理的标本是法国解剖学实验室的一个重要来源,并提出了与处理这些标本相关的生物风险的初步问题。在解剖工作的背景下,这种接触是主要的,风险涉及到所有尸体的接受者:解剖学家和研究人员,以及学生和实验室技术人员,他们都需要处理一个刚刚死去的人。鉴于此,我们想知道,最近纳入法国生物伦理法的关于科学目的的遗体捐赠的规定是否充分考虑到了这种风险,以及当我们研究文献时,这种风险的真正程度是什么。从上个世纪开始,解剖学模型上感染流行率的数据各不相同。正如文献中所描述的那样,死亡后病原体生存能力的持续存在,使我们无法就没有死后传染性达成科学共识。尽管处理尖锐物体或溅起人体体液固有的意外伤害风险,但没有义务在解剖工作之前对尸体进行检测,这可能导致在用户不知情的情况下提供受感染的尸体。鉴于该领域的少数研究表明,人们对这些风险的理解和管理方式存在很大差异,因此还应提出将与解剖工作相关的“生物风险预防”措施纳入2021年以来管理遗体捐赠的生物伦理法的必要性。最后,应鼓励促进研究,就为科学和教育目的而冷藏的尸体在死后传播传染病的风险提供确凿的科学证据,从而为死后传染问题提供明确和明确的答案
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信