D. VanDevanter , C. O'Rourke , K. Odem-Davis , J. Clancy , M. Konstan , N. Mayer Hamblett
{"title":"WS01.01Predicting future pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) rates for cystic fibrosis (CF) clinical trials","authors":"D. VanDevanter , C. O'Rourke , K. Odem-Davis , J. Clancy , M. Konstan , N. Mayer Hamblett","doi":"10.1016/j.jcf.2025.03.492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Due to the clinical importance of CF pulmonary exacerbations (PEx), regulators accept PEx rate difference as clinical trial efficacy endpoint. Although CFTR modulators have reduced overall PEx rates, this endpoint remains relevant to future CF drug development, provided study populations can be enriched for individuals with elevated PEx risk. Although the number of prior-year PEx treated with intravenous antimicrobials (IV-PEx) strongly predicts future IV-PEx risk [JCF. 2016;15(3):372-9], IV-PEx incidence has fallen to a point where it has little if any utility as a clinical trial endpoint: today PEx treated with antibiotics <em>by any route</em> (anyPEx) are studied despite little knowledge of associations between prior year anyPEx number and future PEx rates. We tested whether prior year anyPEX number predicted future anyPEx rates in CF adults receiving and not receiving the CFTR modulator elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>CF adults with data present in the CF Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) in 2022 & 2023 were studied, provided they had received either</div><div>a) ETI or</div><div>b) no modulators in both years.</div><div>AnyPEx were counted; treatments starting <28 days of a previous treatment start were considered part of the previous PEx. 2023 PEx rates were compared among subgroups having 0, 1-2, or 3+ PEx in 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>PEx counted in 2022 strongly correlated with mean 2023 PEx rates within both the ETI and No Modulator groups (P<.001, table), with the mean rate for the entire ETI group lower than that of the No Modulator group, as well as within subgroups with <u>0 and 1-2 PEx</u> in 2022 (table).<span><div><div><table><thead><tr><td><span>Empty Cell</span></td><th>No 2022 PEx</th><th>One or Two 2022 PEx</th><th>Three plus 2022 PEx</th><th>Overall</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th><strong>2023 ETI group PEx rate (N)</strong></th><td>0.23/yr (9452)</td><td>0.78/yr (3267)</td><td>2.19/yr (469)</td><td>0.43/yr (13,188)</td></tr><tr><th><strong>2023 No Modulator group PEx rate (N)</strong></th><td>0.32/yr (1356)</td><td>1.08/yr (633)</td><td>2.37/yr (159)</td><td>0.70/yr (2148)</td></tr><tr><th><strong>Relative rate (ETI/No Modulator), [95% CI]</strong></th><td>0.71 [0.63, 0.79]</td><td>0.72 [0.65, 0.80]</td><td>0.92 [0.78, 1.10]</td><td>0.62 [0.57, 0.68]</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>An unmet need for therapeutic interventions to reduce CF PEx risk remains, even in populations receiving CFTR modulators. The number of anyPEx counted in a prior year strongly predict future anyPEx rates in adults, suggesting an enrichment approach for CF trials using difference in PEx rates as an efficacy endpoint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15452,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","volume":"24 ","pages":"Page S1"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569199325005880","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Due to the clinical importance of CF pulmonary exacerbations (PEx), regulators accept PEx rate difference as clinical trial efficacy endpoint. Although CFTR modulators have reduced overall PEx rates, this endpoint remains relevant to future CF drug development, provided study populations can be enriched for individuals with elevated PEx risk. Although the number of prior-year PEx treated with intravenous antimicrobials (IV-PEx) strongly predicts future IV-PEx risk [JCF. 2016;15(3):372-9], IV-PEx incidence has fallen to a point where it has little if any utility as a clinical trial endpoint: today PEx treated with antibiotics by any route (anyPEx) are studied despite little knowledge of associations between prior year anyPEx number and future PEx rates. We tested whether prior year anyPEX number predicted future anyPEx rates in CF adults receiving and not receiving the CFTR modulator elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI).
Methods
CF adults with data present in the CF Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) in 2022 & 2023 were studied, provided they had received either
a) ETI or
b) no modulators in both years.
AnyPEx were counted; treatments starting <28 days of a previous treatment start were considered part of the previous PEx. 2023 PEx rates were compared among subgroups having 0, 1-2, or 3+ PEx in 2022.
Results
PEx counted in 2022 strongly correlated with mean 2023 PEx rates within both the ETI and No Modulator groups (P<.001, table), with the mean rate for the entire ETI group lower than that of the No Modulator group, as well as within subgroups with 0 and 1-2 PEx in 2022 (table).
Empty Cell
No 2022 PEx
One or Two 2022 PEx
Three plus 2022 PEx
Overall
2023 ETI group PEx rate (N)
0.23/yr (9452)
0.78/yr (3267)
2.19/yr (469)
0.43/yr (13,188)
2023 No Modulator group PEx rate (N)
0.32/yr (1356)
1.08/yr (633)
2.37/yr (159)
0.70/yr (2148)
Relative rate (ETI/No Modulator), [95% CI]
0.71 [0.63, 0.79]
0.72 [0.65, 0.80]
0.92 [0.78, 1.10]
0.62 [0.57, 0.68]
Conclusions
An unmet need for therapeutic interventions to reduce CF PEx risk remains, even in populations receiving CFTR modulators. The number of anyPEx counted in a prior year strongly predict future anyPEx rates in adults, suggesting an enrichment approach for CF trials using difference in PEx rates as an efficacy endpoint.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cystic Fibrosis is the official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society. The journal is devoted to promoting the research and treatment of cystic fibrosis. To this end the journal publishes original scientific articles, editorials, case reports, short communications and other information relevant to cystic fibrosis. The journal also publishes news and articles concerning the activities and policies of the ECFS as well as those of other societies related the ECFS.