{"title":"WS02.04Perspectives on inhaled therapy in the post-CFTR modulator era: a survey of adults with cystic fibrosis","authors":"R.D. Sandler , Z.H. Hoo , S.M.B. Ariss","doi":"10.1016/j.jcf.2025.03.501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The transformative effects of CFTR modulators (CFTRm) have led adults with cystic fibrosis (awCF) and clinicians to re-evaluate the role of inhaled therapy. Our objective was to understand the perspectives of awCF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A survey was shared via two CF-specific UK mailing lists and social media. Participants rated the importance of inhaled therapy from 0 (least) to 100 (most) and noted any changes since starting CFTRm. Free-text responses were categorised into insight-generating themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Responses were received from 414 people with CF, of which 224 (54%) identified as female. Responders represented 17/26 UK adult CF centres (range 1-35 per centre). The majority were prescribed CFTRm (n=344, 83.1%) and/or inhaled therapy (n=321, 77.5%). Overall, the perceived importance of inhaled therapy was significantly lower among those on CFTRm, median of 72/100 (IQR: 48.0) compared to 88 (IQR: 45.3), p = 0.03. Among those prescribed CFTRm, 138 (40.1%) regarded inhaled therapy as less important than prior to CFTRm. This perspective was attributed to a reduction in symptoms, a lack of perceived benefit from inhaled therapy, and a desire to decrease treatment burden. Several considered inhaled therapy more appropriate for acute illness rather than routine maintenance. Conversely, 172 (50%) considered inhaled therapy equally or more important than before CFTRm. Their rationale included an awareness of cumulative lung damage, clinician recommendations, a discernible benefit from inhaled therapy, and the belief that it helps sustain the benefits of CFTRm into later life.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The impact of CFTRm on perspectives regarding inhaled therapy is variable amongst the awCF in the UK. Whilst population-level evidence regarding the clinical impact of changing inhaled therapy regimens for awCF taking CFTRm is awaited, clinicians should be aware of the variation in patient perspective during the process of shared decision-making and individualisation of care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15452,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","volume":"24 ","pages":"Page S4"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569199325005971","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
The transformative effects of CFTR modulators (CFTRm) have led adults with cystic fibrosis (awCF) and clinicians to re-evaluate the role of inhaled therapy. Our objective was to understand the perspectives of awCF.
Methods
A survey was shared via two CF-specific UK mailing lists and social media. Participants rated the importance of inhaled therapy from 0 (least) to 100 (most) and noted any changes since starting CFTRm. Free-text responses were categorised into insight-generating themes.
Results
Responses were received from 414 people with CF, of which 224 (54%) identified as female. Responders represented 17/26 UK adult CF centres (range 1-35 per centre). The majority were prescribed CFTRm (n=344, 83.1%) and/or inhaled therapy (n=321, 77.5%). Overall, the perceived importance of inhaled therapy was significantly lower among those on CFTRm, median of 72/100 (IQR: 48.0) compared to 88 (IQR: 45.3), p = 0.03. Among those prescribed CFTRm, 138 (40.1%) regarded inhaled therapy as less important than prior to CFTRm. This perspective was attributed to a reduction in symptoms, a lack of perceived benefit from inhaled therapy, and a desire to decrease treatment burden. Several considered inhaled therapy more appropriate for acute illness rather than routine maintenance. Conversely, 172 (50%) considered inhaled therapy equally or more important than before CFTRm. Their rationale included an awareness of cumulative lung damage, clinician recommendations, a discernible benefit from inhaled therapy, and the belief that it helps sustain the benefits of CFTRm into later life.
Conclusions
The impact of CFTRm on perspectives regarding inhaled therapy is variable amongst the awCF in the UK. Whilst population-level evidence regarding the clinical impact of changing inhaled therapy regimens for awCF taking CFTRm is awaited, clinicians should be aware of the variation in patient perspective during the process of shared decision-making and individualisation of care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cystic Fibrosis is the official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society. The journal is devoted to promoting the research and treatment of cystic fibrosis. To this end the journal publishes original scientific articles, editorials, case reports, short communications and other information relevant to cystic fibrosis. The journal also publishes news and articles concerning the activities and policies of the ECFS as well as those of other societies related the ECFS.