Xiaojun Zheng , Shan Zhong , Ohidul Alam , Syed Jawad Hossen , Daolin Du
{"title":"Microplastics and heavy metals emissions from healthcare waste management: A comparative life cycle assessment","authors":"Xiaojun Zheng , Shan Zhong , Ohidul Alam , Syed Jawad Hossen , Daolin Du","doi":"10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Healthcare Waste Management</em> (HCWM) contributes to environmental pollution and health hazards. There are several established approaches to measure environmental and health impacts from HCWM. Amidst, <em>Life Cycle Assessment</em> (LCA) is one of the most popular tools to evaluate such impacts. This research was conducted to compare environmental impacts, and <em>Microplastics</em> (MPs) and <em>Heavy Metals</em> (HMs) emissions through LCA from HCWM between public and private <em>Healthcare Facilities</em> (HCFs) in Chattogram, Bangladesh. Five case studies were conducted based on the size of HCFs including one ideal scenario (developed with minimum impacts). The LCA was evaluated by SimaPro version 9.5.0.0 software and the ReCiPe 2016 method. Results revealed that private HCFs highly contributed to the eighteen studied impact categories. The main impact categories were human toxicity, global warming, ecotoxicity, eutrophication, acidification and resource scarcity. The existing common <em>Healthcare Waste</em> (HCW) disposal options were waste transport, open burning, recycling and dumping. The ranges of major impacts from HCWM were global warming (0.588–1.122 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq), followed by human non-carcinogenic toxicity (0.002–0.003 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq.) and ecotoxicity (0.000–0.001 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq.). It demonstrated that dumping of HCW, landfill leachate, open burning/ incineration ash and recycling processes along with wastewater of recycling plants are the potential sources of HMs (up to 14480 mg/kg waste) and MPs (1906–7223 items/kg waste) pollution. This study demonstrates the potential levels of environmental impacts along with HMs and MPs emissions from the HCWM system, which will facilitate the relevant authorities and policy makers to adopt the required strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23969,"journal":{"name":"Waste management","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 114932"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X25003435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Healthcare Waste Management (HCWM) contributes to environmental pollution and health hazards. There are several established approaches to measure environmental and health impacts from HCWM. Amidst, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is one of the most popular tools to evaluate such impacts. This research was conducted to compare environmental impacts, and Microplastics (MPs) and Heavy Metals (HMs) emissions through LCA from HCWM between public and private Healthcare Facilities (HCFs) in Chattogram, Bangladesh. Five case studies were conducted based on the size of HCFs including one ideal scenario (developed with minimum impacts). The LCA was evaluated by SimaPro version 9.5.0.0 software and the ReCiPe 2016 method. Results revealed that private HCFs highly contributed to the eighteen studied impact categories. The main impact categories were human toxicity, global warming, ecotoxicity, eutrophication, acidification and resource scarcity. The existing common Healthcare Waste (HCW) disposal options were waste transport, open burning, recycling and dumping. The ranges of major impacts from HCWM were global warming (0.588–1.122 kg CO2 eq), followed by human non-carcinogenic toxicity (0.002–0.003 kg CO2 eq.) and ecotoxicity (0.000–0.001 kg CO2 eq.). It demonstrated that dumping of HCW, landfill leachate, open burning/ incineration ash and recycling processes along with wastewater of recycling plants are the potential sources of HMs (up to 14480 mg/kg waste) and MPs (1906–7223 items/kg waste) pollution. This study demonstrates the potential levels of environmental impacts along with HMs and MPs emissions from the HCWM system, which will facilitate the relevant authorities and policy makers to adopt the required strategies.
医疗废物管理(HCWM)造成环境污染和健康危害。有几种既定的方法来衡量污水处理厂对环境和健康的影响。其中,生命周期评估(LCA)是最流行的评估此类影响的工具之一。本研究旨在比较孟加拉国Chattogram的公共和私营医疗机构(hcf)之间的HCWM通过LCA产生的环境影响以及微塑料(MPs)和重金属(HMs)排放。根据氟氯烃的大小进行了五个案例研究,其中包括一个理想情景(在影响最小的情况下开发)。采用SimaPro 9.5.0.0版本软件和ReCiPe 2016方法对LCA进行评价。结果显示,私人氢氟烃对所研究的18个影响类别贡献很大。主要影响类别为人类毒性、全球变暖、生态毒性、富营养化、酸化和资源稀缺。现有常见的医疗废物处置方案是废物运输、露天焚烧、回收和倾倒。HCWM的主要影响范围是全球变暖(0.588-1.122 kg CO2当量),其次是人类非致癌毒性(0.002-0.003 kg CO2当量)和生态毒性(0.000-0.001 kg CO2当量)。研究表明,倾倒HCW、垃圾填埋场渗滤液、露天焚烧/焚化灰和回收过程以及回收厂的废水是HMs(高达14480毫克/公斤废物)和MPs(1906-7223毫克/公斤废物)污染的潜在来源。本研究展示了污水处理系统对环境的潜在影响水平,以及排放的有机污染物和有机污染物,这将有助于有关当局和政策制定者采取所需的策略。
期刊介绍:
Waste Management is devoted to the presentation and discussion of information on solid wastes,it covers the entire lifecycle of solid. wastes.
Scope:
Addresses solid wastes in both industrialized and economically developing countries
Covers various types of solid wastes, including:
Municipal (e.g., residential, institutional, commercial, light industrial)
Agricultural
Special (e.g., C and D, healthcare, household hazardous wastes, sewage sludge)