S. García de Madinabeitia , J. Velasco-Acebes , J.I. Gil Ibarguchi , G. Layne , Y. Lahaye , F. Molnár , F. Tornos
{"title":"Fe, Cu and S isotopes as tracers of microbial reduction in the shale-hosted VMS deposits of the Iberian Pyrite Belt","authors":"S. García de Madinabeitia , J. Velasco-Acebes , J.I. Gil Ibarguchi , G. Layne , Y. Lahaye , F. Molnár , F. Tornos","doi":"10.1016/j.gexplo.2025.107819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study represents an exploration of the geochemistry of sulphide minerals from prominent shale-hosted volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits of the Iberian Pyrite Belt, including Sotiel-Migollas, Tharsis, Neves Corvo and Lousal using the non-traditional heavy stable isotopes of Fe and Cu along with the S light isotope. Sampling encompassed a diverse range of styles of mineralization, including the dominant fine-grained massive sulphides sometimes exhibiting sedimentary layering, carbonate-rich mounds dominated by sulphides-siderite and formed by the superposition of microbial mats in anoxic bottoms, underlying subseafloor feeder structures (stockworks) and disseminated pyrite within the altered host shales. The δ<sup>56</sup>Fe<sub>IRMM-014</sub> values of pyrite exhibit a range from −2.62 to +2.58 ‰, while those of pyrrhotite range from −1.93 to −0.40 ‰. Chalcopyrite δ<sup>65</sup>Cu<sub>SRM-976</sub> signature varies between −1.11 and + 0.95 ‰, while the measured δ<sup>34</sup>S<sub>V-CDT</sub> values fluctuate from −45.0 to +9.4 ‰ in pyrite, −6.8 to +2.1 ‰ in pyrrhotite, and − 10.1 to +6.2 ‰ in chalcopyrite. Notably, pyrite grains within massive sulphides consistently exhibit more negative and variable δ<sup>56</sup>Fe and δ<sup>34</sup>S values than those in the hydrothermally altered host shales (apart from Neves Corvo) and stockworks. These findings strongly imply that the exhalative mineralization incorporated substantial amounts of iron derived from the dissimilatory reduction of aqueous Fe<sup>+3</sup>, attributable to low-temperature (<100–120 °C) microbial reduction and contemporaneous with biogenic sulphate reduction. Consequently, Fe in pyrite is likely inherited from both the reduced hydrothermal fluids venting on the seafloor and the microbial reduction of oxidized iron dissolved in ambient seawater. While the microbial influence on Cu isotope signatures is less evident, we infer its potential significance. Superimposed hydrothermal refining during the late percolation of hot hydrothermal fluids reveals a non-biogenic kinetic fractionation, with partial overprinting of the early mineralization and neoformation of sulphides depicting isotopically heavy δ<sup>56</sup>Fe, δ<sup>65</sup>Cu, and δ<sup>34</sup>S signatures that are interpreted as of deep derivation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16336,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geochemical Exploration","volume":"277 ","pages":"Article 107819"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geochemical Exploration","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375674225001517","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study represents an exploration of the geochemistry of sulphide minerals from prominent shale-hosted volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits of the Iberian Pyrite Belt, including Sotiel-Migollas, Tharsis, Neves Corvo and Lousal using the non-traditional heavy stable isotopes of Fe and Cu along with the S light isotope. Sampling encompassed a diverse range of styles of mineralization, including the dominant fine-grained massive sulphides sometimes exhibiting sedimentary layering, carbonate-rich mounds dominated by sulphides-siderite and formed by the superposition of microbial mats in anoxic bottoms, underlying subseafloor feeder structures (stockworks) and disseminated pyrite within the altered host shales. The δ56FeIRMM-014 values of pyrite exhibit a range from −2.62 to +2.58 ‰, while those of pyrrhotite range from −1.93 to −0.40 ‰. Chalcopyrite δ65CuSRM-976 signature varies between −1.11 and + 0.95 ‰, while the measured δ34SV-CDT values fluctuate from −45.0 to +9.4 ‰ in pyrite, −6.8 to +2.1 ‰ in pyrrhotite, and − 10.1 to +6.2 ‰ in chalcopyrite. Notably, pyrite grains within massive sulphides consistently exhibit more negative and variable δ56Fe and δ34S values than those in the hydrothermally altered host shales (apart from Neves Corvo) and stockworks. These findings strongly imply that the exhalative mineralization incorporated substantial amounts of iron derived from the dissimilatory reduction of aqueous Fe+3, attributable to low-temperature (<100–120 °C) microbial reduction and contemporaneous with biogenic sulphate reduction. Consequently, Fe in pyrite is likely inherited from both the reduced hydrothermal fluids venting on the seafloor and the microbial reduction of oxidized iron dissolved in ambient seawater. While the microbial influence on Cu isotope signatures is less evident, we infer its potential significance. Superimposed hydrothermal refining during the late percolation of hot hydrothermal fluids reveals a non-biogenic kinetic fractionation, with partial overprinting of the early mineralization and neoformation of sulphides depicting isotopically heavy δ56Fe, δ65Cu, and δ34S signatures that are interpreted as of deep derivation.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Geochemical Exploration is mostly dedicated to publication of original studies in exploration and environmental geochemistry and related topics.
Contributions considered of prevalent interest for the journal include researches based on the application of innovative methods to:
define the genesis and the evolution of mineral deposits including transfer of elements in large-scale mineralized areas.
analyze complex systems at the boundaries between bio-geochemistry, metal transport and mineral accumulation.
evaluate effects of historical mining activities on the surface environment.
trace pollutant sources and define their fate and transport models in the near-surface and surface environments involving solid, fluid and aerial matrices.
assess and quantify natural and technogenic radioactivity in the environment.
determine geochemical anomalies and set baseline reference values using compositional data analysis, multivariate statistics and geo-spatial analysis.
assess the impacts of anthropogenic contamination on ecosystems and human health at local and regional scale to prioritize and classify risks through deterministic and stochastic approaches.
Papers dedicated to the presentation of newly developed methods in analytical geochemistry to be applied in the field or in laboratory are also within the topics of interest for the journal.