{"title":"Configuration optimization of novel multi-grade waste heat streams coupling and utilization system for enhancing energy efficiency of coking plants","authors":"Fangtian Sun, Kai Liu, Zhicheng Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.tsep.2025.103741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recovering waste heat plays a crucial role in enhancing energy efficiency of the coking plants, thereby contributing to the advancement of carbon peak and carbon neutrality. However, overall thermal performance of current coking waste heat recovery processes is relatively low. To solve the problem, three novel systems for coupling and utilizing multi-grade waste heat streams are proposed based on the progressive optimization principle, and they are designated as the ST-AHP-CCP, ST-AHP-CCHP, and ST-AHP-SE-CCHP. The ST-AHP-CCP is used to recover high- and medium-grade waste heat for generating power and producing chilled water at 16°C. To efficiently recover low-grade waste heat, the ST-AHP-CCP is integrated with a heating subsystem, forming the ST-AHP-CCHP. To improve the alignment between energy supply and demand, a hybrid ejector subsystem is integrated into the ST-AHP-CCHP, thus forming the ST-AHP-SE-CCHP. The three proposed systems are analyzed from the perspectives of thermodynamics and economics. The results indicate that overall performance of the ST-AHP-SE-CCHP is the highest among that of the three proposed systems. Thus, the energy conversion and utilization process of the ST-AHP-SE-CCHP is more advanced, and its system configuration is optimal. For the ST-AHP-SE-CCHP, annual utilization rate of waste heat, annual system production exergy efficiency, and payback period are approximately 44.4 %, 67.7 %, and 3.1 years, respectively. If the ST-AHP-SE-CCHP were applied to all coking plants in northern China, it would save approximately 8.67 × 10<sup>9</sup> Nm<sup>3</sup> of natural gas per year and reduce annual carbon emissions by about 1.80 × 10<sup>7</sup> tons.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23062,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 103741"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904925005311","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recovering waste heat plays a crucial role in enhancing energy efficiency of the coking plants, thereby contributing to the advancement of carbon peak and carbon neutrality. However, overall thermal performance of current coking waste heat recovery processes is relatively low. To solve the problem, three novel systems for coupling and utilizing multi-grade waste heat streams are proposed based on the progressive optimization principle, and they are designated as the ST-AHP-CCP, ST-AHP-CCHP, and ST-AHP-SE-CCHP. The ST-AHP-CCP is used to recover high- and medium-grade waste heat for generating power and producing chilled water at 16°C. To efficiently recover low-grade waste heat, the ST-AHP-CCP is integrated with a heating subsystem, forming the ST-AHP-CCHP. To improve the alignment between energy supply and demand, a hybrid ejector subsystem is integrated into the ST-AHP-CCHP, thus forming the ST-AHP-SE-CCHP. The three proposed systems are analyzed from the perspectives of thermodynamics and economics. The results indicate that overall performance of the ST-AHP-SE-CCHP is the highest among that of the three proposed systems. Thus, the energy conversion and utilization process of the ST-AHP-SE-CCHP is more advanced, and its system configuration is optimal. For the ST-AHP-SE-CCHP, annual utilization rate of waste heat, annual system production exergy efficiency, and payback period are approximately 44.4 %, 67.7 %, and 3.1 years, respectively. If the ST-AHP-SE-CCHP were applied to all coking plants in northern China, it would save approximately 8.67 × 109 Nm3 of natural gas per year and reduce annual carbon emissions by about 1.80 × 107 tons.
期刊介绍:
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (TSEP) publishes original, high-quality research articles that span activities ranging from fundamental scientific research and discussion of the more controversial thermodynamic theories, to developments in thermal engineering that are in many instances examples of the way scientists and engineers are addressing the challenges facing a growing population – smart cities and global warming – maximising thermodynamic efficiencies and minimising all heat losses. It is intended that these will be of current relevance and interest to industry, academia and other practitioners. It is evident that many specialised journals in thermal and, to some extent, in fluid disciplines tend to focus on topics that can be classified as fundamental in nature, or are ‘applied’ and near-market. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress will bridge the gap between these two areas, allowing authors to make an easy choice, should they or a journal editor feel that their papers are ‘out of scope’ when considering other journals. The range of topics covered by Thermal Science and Engineering Progress addresses the rapid rate of development being made in thermal transfer processes as they affect traditional fields, and important growth in the topical research areas of aerospace, thermal biological and medical systems, electronics and nano-technologies, renewable energy systems, food production (including agriculture), and the need to minimise man-made thermal impacts on climate change. Review articles on appropriate topics for TSEP are encouraged, although until TSEP is fully established, these will be limited in number. Before submitting such articles, please contact one of the Editors, or a member of the Editorial Advisory Board with an outline of your proposal and your expertise in the area of your review.