Forest property rights within community forests and their role in enhancing economic well-being in rural Ethiopia

IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Akalu Assfaw Wolde , Enrico Bertacchini
{"title":"Forest property rights within community forests and their role in enhancing economic well-being in rural Ethiopia","authors":"Akalu Assfaw Wolde ,&nbsp;Enrico Bertacchini","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the distribution of forest property rights and their impact on the economic well-being of community forest users in rural Ethiopia. Addressing a critical gap in the literature, the research explores the differentiated effects of operational-level and collective-choice rights on financial gains within community-based forest management (CBFM). Primary data from 365 community forest users were analyzed using OLS, Quantile, and IV regression methods. The findings reveal that community forest users exercise moderate operational rights but perceive significant restrictions on their collective-choice rights. Women and marginalized groups report particularly lower security regarding these rights. Econometric analyses indicate that specific rights—such as access, management, and alienation rights—significantly influence income from community forests. Additionally, both operational and collective-choice rights are found to positively affect income at the aggregate level, underscoring the importance of secure forest property rights. However, the results also highlight notable disparities in the impact of property rights. Households with a male head, small forests, and those with high forest dependence experience greater benefits from secure rights. Moreover, access to private forest plots consistently reduces the benefits derived from community forests, suggesting lower investment efforts in communal forest resources by private forest owners. The study underscores the need to strengthen forest property rights, implement targeted interventions, and promote integrated land-use practices to enhance the economic, social, and environmental outcomes of community forests in Ethiopia and similar contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 103498"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125000772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the distribution of forest property rights and their impact on the economic well-being of community forest users in rural Ethiopia. Addressing a critical gap in the literature, the research explores the differentiated effects of operational-level and collective-choice rights on financial gains within community-based forest management (CBFM). Primary data from 365 community forest users were analyzed using OLS, Quantile, and IV regression methods. The findings reveal that community forest users exercise moderate operational rights but perceive significant restrictions on their collective-choice rights. Women and marginalized groups report particularly lower security regarding these rights. Econometric analyses indicate that specific rights—such as access, management, and alienation rights—significantly influence income from community forests. Additionally, both operational and collective-choice rights are found to positively affect income at the aggregate level, underscoring the importance of secure forest property rights. However, the results also highlight notable disparities in the impact of property rights. Households with a male head, small forests, and those with high forest dependence experience greater benefits from secure rights. Moreover, access to private forest plots consistently reduces the benefits derived from community forests, suggesting lower investment efforts in communal forest resources by private forest owners. The study underscores the need to strengthen forest property rights, implement targeted interventions, and promote integrated land-use practices to enhance the economic, social, and environmental outcomes of community forests in Ethiopia and similar contexts.
社区森林内的森林产权及其在提高埃塞俄比亚农村经济福利方面的作用
本研究考察了森林产权的分配及其对埃塞俄比亚农村社区森林使用者经济福祉的影响。该研究解决了文献中的一个关键空白,探讨了在社区森林管理(CBFM)中,操作层面和集体选择权对经济收益的不同影响。采用OLS、分位数和IV回归方法对365个社区森林用户的原始数据进行分析。研究结果表明,社区森林使用者行使适度的经营权利,但认为他们的集体选择权受到重大限制。据报告,妇女和边缘群体对这些权利的保障程度尤其低。计量经济学分析表明,特定权利,如使用权、管理权和转让权,显著影响社区森林的收入。此外,发现经营权和集体选择权都对总体收入产生积极影响,强调了保障森林产权的重要性。然而,结果也突出了产权影响方面的显著差异。以男性为户主的家庭、小森林和高度依赖森林的家庭从有保障的权利中获益更大。此外,进入私人森林地块不断减少社区森林带来的利益,表明私人森林所有者对公共森林资源的投资努力减少。该研究强调需要加强森林产权,实施有针对性的干预措施,并促进综合土地利用实践,以提高埃塞俄比亚和类似国家社区森林的经济、社会和环境成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信