Water-Based and alternative extraction techniques for stilbenoids from grape cane: A comparative study

Wilfried Andlauer , Roméo Zuchuat , Ralf Schweiggert , Paul Besrukow
{"title":"Water-Based and alternative extraction techniques for stilbenoids from grape cane: A comparative study","authors":"Wilfried Andlauer ,&nbsp;Roméo Zuchuat ,&nbsp;Ralf Schweiggert ,&nbsp;Paul Besrukow","doi":"10.1016/j.wmb.2025.100219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Grape cane is a viticultural byproduct rich in bioactive stilbenoids and other phenolic compounds. Valorization of grape cane relies on effective extraction methods, traditionally using ethanol. This study aimed to compare a series of extraction techniques, including an extraction based on various ethanol–water mixtures as well as water-based methods combined with ultrasound-assisted extraction and microwave-assisted extraction. In this study, water-based extraction led to stilbenoid extraction yields determined by HPLC-DAD analyses that were significantly lower, even when applying ultrasound (43 mg/kg grape cane), than those obtained with 80 % ethanol maceration (4373 mg/kg). Water-based extraction utilizing microwave heating at optimal conditions (100 °C, 20 <!--> <!-->min) allowed yields of about 555 mg/kg. The spectrophotometrically measured total phenolic content showed a similar trend, with the highest yield achieved at 100 °C for 20 min under microwave-assisted extraction (13 g GAE /kg), remaining notably lower compared to using 80 % ethanol (20 g GAE /kg). These findings highlight the potential of increased temperature water-based extraction methods but also underscore the need for further optimization. Future research should aim to refine these techniques and explore more advanced methods, such as subcritical or high-pressure water extraction, to enhance the valorization of grape cane and support its use in producing bioactive extracts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101276,"journal":{"name":"Waste Management Bulletin","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste Management Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949750725000483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grape cane is a viticultural byproduct rich in bioactive stilbenoids and other phenolic compounds. Valorization of grape cane relies on effective extraction methods, traditionally using ethanol. This study aimed to compare a series of extraction techniques, including an extraction based on various ethanol–water mixtures as well as water-based methods combined with ultrasound-assisted extraction and microwave-assisted extraction. In this study, water-based extraction led to stilbenoid extraction yields determined by HPLC-DAD analyses that were significantly lower, even when applying ultrasound (43 mg/kg grape cane), than those obtained with 80 % ethanol maceration (4373 mg/kg). Water-based extraction utilizing microwave heating at optimal conditions (100 °C, 20  min) allowed yields of about 555 mg/kg. The spectrophotometrically measured total phenolic content showed a similar trend, with the highest yield achieved at 100 °C for 20 min under microwave-assisted extraction (13 g GAE /kg), remaining notably lower compared to using 80 % ethanol (20 g GAE /kg). These findings highlight the potential of increased temperature water-based extraction methods but also underscore the need for further optimization. Future research should aim to refine these techniques and explore more advanced methods, such as subcritical or high-pressure water extraction, to enhance the valorization of grape cane and support its use in producing bioactive extracts.
葡萄中二苯乙烯类化合物水基提取与替代提取技术的比较研究
甘蔗是葡萄栽培的副产品,富含生物活性二苯乙烯类化合物和其他酚类化合物。甘蔗的增值依赖于有效的提取方法,传统上使用乙醇。本研究的目的是比较一系列的提取技术,包括基于各种乙醇-水混合物的提取,以及水基方法结合超声辅助提取和微波辅助提取。在本研究中,水基提取导致通过HPLC-DAD分析确定的二苯乙烯类化合物的提取率显着低于80%乙醇浸渍(4373 mg/kg),即使使用超声波(43 mg/kg葡萄藤)。在最佳条件下(100°C, 20分钟),利用微波加热的水基提取可以得到约555 mg/kg。分光光度法测定的总酚含量也显示出类似的趋势,在微波辅助提取下,在100°C下,20 min的收率最高(13 g GAE /kg),与使用80%乙醇(20 g GAE /kg)相比,收率明显较低。这些发现突出了提高温度的水基提取方法的潜力,但也强调了进一步优化的必要性。未来的研究应致力于完善这些技术,并探索更先进的方法,如亚临界或高压水提取,以提高葡萄的价值,并支持其在生产生物活性提取物中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信