{"title":"Water-Based and alternative extraction techniques for stilbenoids from grape cane: A comparative study","authors":"Wilfried Andlauer , Roméo Zuchuat , Ralf Schweiggert , Paul Besrukow","doi":"10.1016/j.wmb.2025.100219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Grape cane is a viticultural byproduct rich in bioactive stilbenoids and other phenolic compounds. Valorization of grape cane relies on effective extraction methods, traditionally using ethanol. This study aimed to compare a series of extraction techniques, including an extraction based on various ethanol–water mixtures as well as water-based methods combined with ultrasound-assisted extraction and microwave-assisted extraction. In this study, water-based extraction led to stilbenoid extraction yields determined by HPLC-DAD analyses that were significantly lower, even when applying ultrasound (43 mg/kg grape cane), than those obtained with 80 % ethanol maceration (4373 mg/kg). Water-based extraction utilizing microwave heating at optimal conditions (100 °C, 20 <!--> <!-->min) allowed yields of about 555 mg/kg. The spectrophotometrically measured total phenolic content showed a similar trend, with the highest yield achieved at 100 °C for 20 min under microwave-assisted extraction (13 g GAE /kg), remaining notably lower compared to using 80 % ethanol (20 g GAE /kg). These findings highlight the potential of increased temperature water-based extraction methods but also underscore the need for further optimization. Future research should aim to refine these techniques and explore more advanced methods, such as subcritical or high-pressure water extraction, to enhance the valorization of grape cane and support its use in producing bioactive extracts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101276,"journal":{"name":"Waste Management Bulletin","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste Management Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949750725000483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Grape cane is a viticultural byproduct rich in bioactive stilbenoids and other phenolic compounds. Valorization of grape cane relies on effective extraction methods, traditionally using ethanol. This study aimed to compare a series of extraction techniques, including an extraction based on various ethanol–water mixtures as well as water-based methods combined with ultrasound-assisted extraction and microwave-assisted extraction. In this study, water-based extraction led to stilbenoid extraction yields determined by HPLC-DAD analyses that were significantly lower, even when applying ultrasound (43 mg/kg grape cane), than those obtained with 80 % ethanol maceration (4373 mg/kg). Water-based extraction utilizing microwave heating at optimal conditions (100 °C, 20 min) allowed yields of about 555 mg/kg. The spectrophotometrically measured total phenolic content showed a similar trend, with the highest yield achieved at 100 °C for 20 min under microwave-assisted extraction (13 g GAE /kg), remaining notably lower compared to using 80 % ethanol (20 g GAE /kg). These findings highlight the potential of increased temperature water-based extraction methods but also underscore the need for further optimization. Future research should aim to refine these techniques and explore more advanced methods, such as subcritical or high-pressure water extraction, to enhance the valorization of grape cane and support its use in producing bioactive extracts.