Smart farming technologies and changes to farm work: New insights into on-farm experiences

IF 13.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Ruth Nettle , Julie Ingram
{"title":"Smart farming technologies and changes to farm work: New insights into on-farm experiences","authors":"Ruth Nettle ,&nbsp;Julie Ingram","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The intersect between technologies and the future of work is a key topic for both practitioner and scholarly communities. In this paper, we explore this intersect within agriculture by examining the changes to work for farmers implementing smart farming technologies (SFTs) in the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia. We interviewed 17 farmers across the UK and Australia from horticulture, dairy and mixed farming (arable and livestock) enterprises who were implementing diverse SFTs. Interview questions explored farmers' experiences in implementing SFTs with respect to any changes to work for themselves and their employees. Based on an interdisciplinary conceptual framework we developed from the literature for analysing farm work, we applied qualitative data analysis methods to examine the changes to work. We found the benefits from reduced work-duration were commonly counteracted by time spent in computer set-up and data work, with subsequent negative effects for the cognitive and affective dimensions of workload. The organisation of farm work influenced the type of skills and knowledge required to implement SFTs, with larger and corporate farms outsourcing these requirements to advisers, while smaller-medium sized farms used SFTs to augment their existing knowledge and skills, enabling employers to do more with their own time and enhancing employee engagement in work. We found more similarities than differences in work changes between countries. The interrelationships and feedback loops we have identified between the different aspects of work bring a novel perspective to technological transitions in agriculture and represent an important orientation point for researchers and technology developers to better anticipate work effects from different types of SFTs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 124227"},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525002586","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The intersect between technologies and the future of work is a key topic for both practitioner and scholarly communities. In this paper, we explore this intersect within agriculture by examining the changes to work for farmers implementing smart farming technologies (SFTs) in the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia. We interviewed 17 farmers across the UK and Australia from horticulture, dairy and mixed farming (arable and livestock) enterprises who were implementing diverse SFTs. Interview questions explored farmers' experiences in implementing SFTs with respect to any changes to work for themselves and their employees. Based on an interdisciplinary conceptual framework we developed from the literature for analysing farm work, we applied qualitative data analysis methods to examine the changes to work. We found the benefits from reduced work-duration were commonly counteracted by time spent in computer set-up and data work, with subsequent negative effects for the cognitive and affective dimensions of workload. The organisation of farm work influenced the type of skills and knowledge required to implement SFTs, with larger and corporate farms outsourcing these requirements to advisers, while smaller-medium sized farms used SFTs to augment their existing knowledge and skills, enabling employers to do more with their own time and enhancing employee engagement in work. We found more similarities than differences in work changes between countries. The interrelationships and feedback loops we have identified between the different aspects of work bring a novel perspective to technological transitions in agriculture and represent an important orientation point for researchers and technology developers to better anticipate work effects from different types of SFTs.
智能农业技术和农业工作的变化:对农场体验的新见解
技术和未来工作之间的交集是从业者和学术界的一个关键话题。在本文中,我们通过研究在英国(UK)和澳大利亚实施智能农业技术(SFTs)的农民工作的变化来探索农业中的这种交叉点。我们采访了英国和澳大利亚的17位农民,他们来自园艺、乳制品和混合农业(可耕地和牲畜)企业,正在实施不同的SFTs。访谈问题探讨了农民在实施SFTs方面的经验,以及对他们自己和员工工作的任何改变。基于跨学科的概念框架,我们从分析农业工作的文献中发展出来,我们应用定性数据分析方法来检查工作的变化。我们发现,减少工作时间带来的好处通常会被花在电脑设置和数据工作上的时间抵消,从而对工作量的认知和情感维度产生负面影响。农场工作的组织影响了实施SFTs所需的技能和知识类型,大型农场和企业农场将这些要求外包给顾问,而中小型农场使用SFTs来增加他们现有的知识和技能,使雇主能够利用自己的时间做更多的事情,并提高员工对工作的投入。我们发现,在不同国家之间的工作变化中,相似之处多于差异。我们已经确定的工作不同方面之间的相互关系和反馈回路为农业技术转型带来了新的视角,并为研究人员和技术开发人员更好地预测不同类型的SFTs的工作效果提供了重要的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信