Jason Acworth , Jimena del Castillo , Lokesh Kumar Tiwari , Dianne Atkins , Allan de Caen , Arun Bansal , Thomaz Bittencourt Couto , Stephan Katzenschlager , Monica Kleinman , Jesus Lopez-Herce , Ryan W. Morgan , Michelle Myburgh , Vinay Nadkarni , Janice A. Tijssen , Barnaby R. Scholefield , International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Paediatric Life Support Task Force
{"title":"Energy doses for paediatric defibrillation in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Jason Acworth , Jimena del Castillo , Lokesh Kumar Tiwari , Dianne Atkins , Allan de Caen , Arun Bansal , Thomaz Bittencourt Couto , Stephan Katzenschlager , Monica Kleinman , Jesus Lopez-Herce , Ryan W. Morgan , Michelle Myburgh , Vinay Nadkarni , Janice A. Tijssen , Barnaby R. Scholefield , International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Paediatric Life Support Task Force","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Early defibrillation is the foundation of treatment of shockable ventricular arrhythmias (VF, pVT) but optimal energy doses for initial and subsequent shocks in paediatric cardiac arrest remain controversial.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess the use of different energy doses for initial defibrillation in infants, children and adolescents with ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT) during cardiac arrest.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was performed by the ILCOR Paediatric Life Support Task force. This systematic review was prospectively registered as PROSPERO CRD42024548898. A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) was performed for clinical trials and observational studies, published before 1 January 2025, involving cardiac defibrillation in infants and children (excluding newborn infants) in cardiac arrest. Investigators reviewed studies for relevance, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the ROBINS-I framework. Critical outcomes included survival to hospital discharge and return of spontaneous circulation. Results were compiled into a Summary of Findings table using the GRADEpro Guideline Development tool. Statistical calculations and Forest plot generation were performed using RevMan.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 7 relevant observational studies. The majority of studies involved in-hospital cardiac arrest. The overall certainty of evidence was very low. Critical (survival to hospital discharge, return of spontaneous circulation) and important (termination of VF/pVT) outcomes were not significantly better or worse when initial defibrillation doses of <1.5 J/kg or >2.5 J/kg were used for children in cardiac arrest with a shockable rhythm compared with initial doses approximating 2 J/kg.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The current available data suggest that outcomes are not significantly better or worse when initial defibrillation doses of <1.5 J/kg or >2.5 J/kg are used for children in cardiac arrest with a shockable rhythm (VF or pVT) compared with initial doses approximating 2 J/kg. Well-designed randomised trials are needed to address this important question.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100991"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425001286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Early defibrillation is the foundation of treatment of shockable ventricular arrhythmias (VF, pVT) but optimal energy doses for initial and subsequent shocks in paediatric cardiac arrest remain controversial.
Objectives
To assess the use of different energy doses for initial defibrillation in infants, children and adolescents with ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT) during cardiac arrest.
Methods
A systematic review was performed by the ILCOR Paediatric Life Support Task force. This systematic review was prospectively registered as PROSPERO CRD42024548898. A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) was performed for clinical trials and observational studies, published before 1 January 2025, involving cardiac defibrillation in infants and children (excluding newborn infants) in cardiac arrest. Investigators reviewed studies for relevance, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the ROBINS-I framework. Critical outcomes included survival to hospital discharge and return of spontaneous circulation. Results were compiled into a Summary of Findings table using the GRADEpro Guideline Development tool. Statistical calculations and Forest plot generation were performed using RevMan.
Results
We identified 7 relevant observational studies. The majority of studies involved in-hospital cardiac arrest. The overall certainty of evidence was very low. Critical (survival to hospital discharge, return of spontaneous circulation) and important (termination of VF/pVT) outcomes were not significantly better or worse when initial defibrillation doses of <1.5 J/kg or >2.5 J/kg were used for children in cardiac arrest with a shockable rhythm compared with initial doses approximating 2 J/kg.
Conclusions
The current available data suggest that outcomes are not significantly better or worse when initial defibrillation doses of <1.5 J/kg or >2.5 J/kg are used for children in cardiac arrest with a shockable rhythm (VF or pVT) compared with initial doses approximating 2 J/kg. Well-designed randomised trials are needed to address this important question.