Energy doses for paediatric defibrillation in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jason Acworth , Jimena del Castillo , Lokesh Kumar Tiwari , Dianne Atkins , Allan de Caen , Arun Bansal , Thomaz Bittencourt Couto , Stephan Katzenschlager , Monica Kleinman , Jesus Lopez-Herce , Ryan W. Morgan , Michelle Myburgh , Vinay Nadkarni , Janice A. Tijssen , Barnaby R. Scholefield , International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Paediatric Life Support Task Force
{"title":"Energy doses for paediatric defibrillation in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Jason Acworth ,&nbsp;Jimena del Castillo ,&nbsp;Lokesh Kumar Tiwari ,&nbsp;Dianne Atkins ,&nbsp;Allan de Caen ,&nbsp;Arun Bansal ,&nbsp;Thomaz Bittencourt Couto ,&nbsp;Stephan Katzenschlager ,&nbsp;Monica Kleinman ,&nbsp;Jesus Lopez-Herce ,&nbsp;Ryan W. Morgan ,&nbsp;Michelle Myburgh ,&nbsp;Vinay Nadkarni ,&nbsp;Janice A. Tijssen ,&nbsp;Barnaby R. Scholefield ,&nbsp;International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Paediatric Life Support Task Force","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Early defibrillation is the foundation of treatment of shockable ventricular arrhythmias (VF, pVT) but optimal energy doses for initial and subsequent shocks in paediatric cardiac arrest remain controversial.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess the use of different energy doses for initial defibrillation in infants, children and adolescents with ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT) during cardiac arrest.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was performed by the ILCOR Paediatric Life Support Task force. This systematic review was prospectively registered as PROSPERO CRD42024548898. A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) was performed for clinical trials and observational studies, published before 1 January 2025, involving cardiac defibrillation in infants and children (excluding newborn infants) in cardiac arrest. Investigators reviewed studies for relevance, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the ROBINS-I framework. Critical outcomes included survival to hospital discharge and return of spontaneous circulation. Results were compiled into a Summary of Findings table using the GRADEpro Guideline Development tool. Statistical calculations and Forest plot generation were performed using RevMan.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 7 relevant observational studies. The majority of studies involved in-hospital cardiac arrest. The overall certainty of evidence was very low. Critical (survival to hospital discharge, return of spontaneous circulation) and important (termination of VF/pVT) outcomes were not significantly better or worse when initial defibrillation doses of &lt;1.5 J/kg or &gt;2.5 J/kg were used for children in cardiac arrest with a shockable rhythm compared with initial doses approximating 2 J/kg.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The current available data suggest that outcomes are not significantly better or worse when initial defibrillation doses of &lt;1.5 J/kg or &gt;2.5 J/kg are used for children in cardiac arrest with a shockable rhythm (VF or pVT) compared with initial doses approximating 2 J/kg. Well-designed randomised trials are needed to address this important question.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100991"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425001286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Early defibrillation is the foundation of treatment of shockable ventricular arrhythmias (VF, pVT) but optimal energy doses for initial and subsequent shocks in paediatric cardiac arrest remain controversial.

Objectives

To assess the use of different energy doses for initial defibrillation in infants, children and adolescents with ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT) during cardiac arrest.

Methods

A systematic review was performed by the ILCOR Paediatric Life Support Task force. This systematic review was prospectively registered as PROSPERO CRD42024548898. A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) was performed for clinical trials and observational studies, published before 1 January 2025, involving cardiac defibrillation in infants and children (excluding newborn infants) in cardiac arrest. Investigators reviewed studies for relevance, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the ROBINS-I framework. Critical outcomes included survival to hospital discharge and return of spontaneous circulation. Results were compiled into a Summary of Findings table using the GRADEpro Guideline Development tool. Statistical calculations and Forest plot generation were performed using RevMan.

Results

We identified 7 relevant observational studies. The majority of studies involved in-hospital cardiac arrest. The overall certainty of evidence was very low. Critical (survival to hospital discharge, return of spontaneous circulation) and important (termination of VF/pVT) outcomes were not significantly better or worse when initial defibrillation doses of <1.5 J/kg or >2.5 J/kg were used for children in cardiac arrest with a shockable rhythm compared with initial doses approximating 2 J/kg.

Conclusions

The current available data suggest that outcomes are not significantly better or worse when initial defibrillation doses of <1.5 J/kg or >2.5 J/kg are used for children in cardiac arrest with a shockable rhythm (VF or pVT) compared with initial doses approximating 2 J/kg. Well-designed randomised trials are needed to address this important question.
心脏骤停儿童除颤的能量剂量:系统评价和荟萃分析
背景:体外除颤是治疗突发性室性心律失常(VF, pVT)的基础,但小儿心脏骤停患者初始和后续电击的最佳能量剂量仍存在争议。目的评价不同能量剂量对心脏骤停期间室性颤动(VF)或无脉性室性心动过速(pVT)的婴儿、儿童和青少年进行初始除颤的效果。方法由ILCOR儿科生命支持工作组进行系统评价。该系统评价的前瞻性注册号为PROSPERO CRD42024548898。检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验登记册(CENTRAL),检索2025年1月1日之前发表的临床试验和观察性研究,涉及心脏骤停的婴儿和儿童(不包括新生儿)的心脏除颤。研究者回顾了相关研究,提取了数据,并使用ROBINS-I框架评估了偏倚风险。关键结局包括存活至出院和恢复自然循环。使用GRADEpro指南制定工具将结果汇编成结果摘要表。使用RevMan进行统计计算和森林样地生成。结果我们确定了7项相关的观察性研究。大多数研究涉及院内心脏骤停。证据的总体确定性非常低。对于有震荡性心律的心脏骤停患儿,初始除颤剂量为1.5 J/kg或2.5 J/kg,与初始剂量约为2 J/kg相比,危重(存活至出院,恢复自主循环)和重要(室间隔/室速终止)结局没有明显改善或恶化。结论:目前可获得的数据表明,对于伴有震荡性心律(VF或pVT)的心脏骤停患儿,初始除颤剂量为1.5 J/kg或2.5 J/kg,与初始剂量约为2 J/kg相比,结果没有明显改善或更差。需要精心设计的随机试验来解决这个重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信