Unlocking knowledge or trapped in distraction? Use of escape room to enhance medical education

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ehsan Toofaninejad PhD , Sara Bagheri PhD Candidate , Masomeh Kalantarion PhD , Seyed-Ahmad Rahimi PhD
{"title":"Unlocking knowledge or trapped in distraction? Use of escape room to enhance medical education","authors":"Ehsan Toofaninejad PhD ,&nbsp;Sara Bagheri PhD Candidate ,&nbsp;Masomeh Kalantarion PhD ,&nbsp;Seyed-Ahmad Rahimi PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtumed.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This letter discusses the innovative use of Escape Room Games (ERGs) in medical education, emphasizing their potential to enhance knowledge acquisition and cognitive engagement among students. Originating in 2007 in Kyoto, Japan, ERGs have evolved into interactive, team-based experiences that simulate real-life clinical scenarios, promoting essential skills such as teamwork, problem-solving, and critical thinking. The implementation of ERGs at institutions like Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust has demonstrated significant improvements in student engagement and confidence in clinical decision-making. However, while ERGs offer immersive learning opportunities, they also present challenges, including potential distractions and negative emotions such as anxiety. This letter advocates for a balanced approach to ERG design, ensuring alignment with educational objectives and addressing concerns related to assessment validity. By fostering a psychologically safe environment, ERGs can encourage active participation and deeper learning, ultimately maximizing their educational value in medical training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences","volume":"20 3","pages":"Pages 332-334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1658361225000460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This letter discusses the innovative use of Escape Room Games (ERGs) in medical education, emphasizing their potential to enhance knowledge acquisition and cognitive engagement among students. Originating in 2007 in Kyoto, Japan, ERGs have evolved into interactive, team-based experiences that simulate real-life clinical scenarios, promoting essential skills such as teamwork, problem-solving, and critical thinking. The implementation of ERGs at institutions like Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust has demonstrated significant improvements in student engagement and confidence in clinical decision-making. However, while ERGs offer immersive learning opportunities, they also present challenges, including potential distractions and negative emotions such as anxiety. This letter advocates for a balanced approach to ERG design, ensuring alignment with educational objectives and addressing concerns related to assessment validity. By fostering a psychologically safe environment, ERGs can encourage active participation and deeper learning, ultimately maximizing their educational value in medical training.
解锁知识还是陷入分心?利用密室逃生加强医学教育
这封信讨论了密室逃脱游戏(ERGs)在医学教育中的创新应用,强调了它们在提高学生知识获取和认知参与方面的潜力。ergg于2007年起源于日本京都,现已发展成为一种互动的、以团队为基础的体验,它模拟真实的临床场景,提高团队合作、解决问题和批判性思维等基本技能。在梅德斯通和坦布里奇韦尔斯NHS信托等机构实施ERGs已经证明,学生的参与度和对临床决策的信心有了显著提高。然而,虽然ERGs提供了沉浸式学习机会,但它们也带来了挑战,包括潜在的分心和焦虑等负面情绪。这封信提倡采用平衡的方法来设计ERG,确保与教育目标保持一致,并解决与评估有效性相关的问题。通过培养心理安全的环境,ERGs可以鼓励积极参与和深入学习,最终最大化其在医学培训中的教育价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences
Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
130
审稿时长
29 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信