{"title":"Association between dietary index for gut microbiota and sleep duration in US adults: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Jingjing Liu, Shaoqiang Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.crmicr.2025.100412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The microbiota-gut-brain axis underlies the pathogenesis of sleep disorders. The dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM) is an innovative diet quality metric related to gut microbiota diversity, with higher scores indicating a healthier gut microbiome. This study aimed to investigate its association with sleep duration.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional study analyzed the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2005 to 2018, involving 25,439 participants aged ≥20 years. The DI-GM score was calculated utilizing dietary recall data, encompassing both beneficial (BGMS) and unfavorable (UGMS) to gut microbiota score. Sleep duration was assessed via the question: “How much sleep do you usually get at night on weekdays or workdays?” and categorized as short (<7 h per night), optimal (7–8 h per night), and long (>8 h per night). Multivariable weighted linear and logistic regression models were performed to determine the association between DI-GM and sleep duration. Secondary analyses included restricted cubic splines (RCS) and subgroup analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the fully adjusted model, a higher DI-GM score was associated with longer sleep duration (β =0.03, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.01–0.04, <em>P</em> < 0.001), as was a higher BGMS (β =0.04, 95 % CI: 0.02–0.06, <em>P</em> < 0.001). Using optimal sleep as the reference category, both higher DI-GM score and BGMS were significantly associated with lower odds of short sleep (DI-GM: odds ratio [OR] =0.96, 95 % CI: 0.93–0.99, <em>P</em> = 0.010; BGMS: OR =0.93, 95 % CI: 0.89–0.96, <em>P</em> < 0.001). RCS revealed nonlinear associations between DI-GM and both outcomes, while BGMS exhibited linear patterns. Subgroup analyses confirmed consistent associations across demographic, lifestyle, and health strata, with significant effect modification by race/ethnicity (<em>P</em> = 0.015 for sleep duration; 0.016 for short sleep) and physical activity (<em>P</em> = 0.033 and 0.007, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Higher DI-GM scores were associated with longer sleep duration, underscoring the potential of gut microbiota-targeted diets for sleep health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34305,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Microbial Sciences","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100412"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Microbial Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666517425000744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The microbiota-gut-brain axis underlies the pathogenesis of sleep disorders. The dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM) is an innovative diet quality metric related to gut microbiota diversity, with higher scores indicating a healthier gut microbiome. This study aimed to investigate its association with sleep duration.
Methods
This cross-sectional study analyzed the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2005 to 2018, involving 25,439 participants aged ≥20 years. The DI-GM score was calculated utilizing dietary recall data, encompassing both beneficial (BGMS) and unfavorable (UGMS) to gut microbiota score. Sleep duration was assessed via the question: “How much sleep do you usually get at night on weekdays or workdays?” and categorized as short (<7 h per night), optimal (7–8 h per night), and long (>8 h per night). Multivariable weighted linear and logistic regression models were performed to determine the association between DI-GM and sleep duration. Secondary analyses included restricted cubic splines (RCS) and subgroup analyses.
Results
In the fully adjusted model, a higher DI-GM score was associated with longer sleep duration (β =0.03, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.01–0.04, P < 0.001), as was a higher BGMS (β =0.04, 95 % CI: 0.02–0.06, P < 0.001). Using optimal sleep as the reference category, both higher DI-GM score and BGMS were significantly associated with lower odds of short sleep (DI-GM: odds ratio [OR] =0.96, 95 % CI: 0.93–0.99, P = 0.010; BGMS: OR =0.93, 95 % CI: 0.89–0.96, P < 0.001). RCS revealed nonlinear associations between DI-GM and both outcomes, while BGMS exhibited linear patterns. Subgroup analyses confirmed consistent associations across demographic, lifestyle, and health strata, with significant effect modification by race/ethnicity (P = 0.015 for sleep duration; 0.016 for short sleep) and physical activity (P = 0.033 and 0.007, respectively).
Conclusions
Higher DI-GM scores were associated with longer sleep duration, underscoring the potential of gut microbiota-targeted diets for sleep health.