Frailty in older adults admitted to hospital: a six-year dual-centre retrospective study of over 53 000 clinical frailty scale assessments

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Emma Walker, Rebecca Winter, Luke Eliot Hodgson
{"title":"Frailty in older adults admitted to hospital: a six-year dual-centre retrospective study of over 53 000 clinical frailty scale assessments","authors":"Emma Walker, Rebecca Winter, Luke Eliot Hodgson","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim To examine frailty assessments in older patients admitted to hospital, and explore associations with sex, admission and discharge status. Methodology Worldwide, the prevalence of frailty is increasing. Stratifying frailty can be beneficial at a population level to improve public health and target local services. At an individual level, recognition of frailty can help inform prognosis and advanced planning. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is validated for predicting outcomes of older hospitalised adults. All patients admitted into two hospitals in the South-East of England between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2022, aged ≥65 years old with an electronically recorded CFS were included. Results Over the study period there were 100 933 admissions, representing 53 361 individual patients. A single admission was observed in 16 284 (30.5%), whilst 37 077 (69.5%) had more than one admission. The mean CFS was 4.62 (SD 1.66) and 49.5% were living with frailty (CFS ≥5). Across 6 years, before, during and after the Covid-19 pandemic, this percentage remained stable. Females had a higher average CFS than males (4.74 vs 4.46, P < 0.01). Patients with a single admission had a higher mean CFS than patients with subsequent readmissions. Patients who died during admission had a higher average CFS than those who survived to discharge (6.02 vs 4.52, P < 0.01). Conclusion This large cohort study of acutely admitted older adults found half were living with frailty. This highlights the importance of frailty identification to optimise personalised care. There was no significant change in frailty severity between 2018 and 2022.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim To examine frailty assessments in older patients admitted to hospital, and explore associations with sex, admission and discharge status. Methodology Worldwide, the prevalence of frailty is increasing. Stratifying frailty can be beneficial at a population level to improve public health and target local services. At an individual level, recognition of frailty can help inform prognosis and advanced planning. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is validated for predicting outcomes of older hospitalised adults. All patients admitted into two hospitals in the South-East of England between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2022, aged ≥65 years old with an electronically recorded CFS were included. Results Over the study period there were 100 933 admissions, representing 53 361 individual patients. A single admission was observed in 16 284 (30.5%), whilst 37 077 (69.5%) had more than one admission. The mean CFS was 4.62 (SD 1.66) and 49.5% were living with frailty (CFS ≥5). Across 6 years, before, during and after the Covid-19 pandemic, this percentage remained stable. Females had a higher average CFS than males (4.74 vs 4.46, P < 0.01). Patients with a single admission had a higher mean CFS than patients with subsequent readmissions. Patients who died during admission had a higher average CFS than those who survived to discharge (6.02 vs 4.52, P < 0.01). Conclusion This large cohort study of acutely admitted older adults found half were living with frailty. This highlights the importance of frailty identification to optimise personalised care. There was no significant change in frailty severity between 2018 and 2022.
入院老年人的虚弱:一项为期6年的双中心回顾性研究,超过53000份临床虚弱量表评估
目的探讨老年住院患者的衰弱评估,并探讨其与性别、入院和出院状况的关系。在世界范围内,虚弱的患病率正在上升。在人口层面上,对脆弱进行分层可能有利于改善公共卫生和有针对性的地方服务。在个人层面上,认识到虚弱可以帮助告知预后和提前计划。临床虚弱量表(CFS)用于预测老年住院成年人的预后。纳入了2017年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间英格兰东南部两家医院收治的年龄≥65岁、电子记录CFS的所有患者。结果研究期间共入院100 933例,患者53 361例。一次入院16 284例(30.5%),一次以上入院37 077例(69.5%)。平均CFS为4.62 (SD 1.66), 49.5%伴有虚弱(CFS≥5)。在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前、期间和之后的6年里,这一比例保持稳定。女性的平均CFS高于男性(4.74 vs 4.46, P <;0.01)。单次入院患者的平均CFS高于随后再次入院的患者。入院时死亡的患者平均CFS高于存活至出院的患者(6.02 vs 4.52, P <;0.01)。结论:这项对急性入院的老年人的大型队列研究发现,一半的老年人生活在虚弱之中。这突出了虚弱识别对优化个性化护理的重要性。在2018年至2022年期间,虚弱的严重程度没有显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信