{"title":"Frailty in older adults admitted to hospital: a six-year dual-centre retrospective study of over 53 000 clinical frailty scale assessments","authors":"Emma Walker, Rebecca Winter, Luke Eliot Hodgson","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim To examine frailty assessments in older patients admitted to hospital, and explore associations with sex, admission and discharge status. Methodology Worldwide, the prevalence of frailty is increasing. Stratifying frailty can be beneficial at a population level to improve public health and target local services. At an individual level, recognition of frailty can help inform prognosis and advanced planning. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is validated for predicting outcomes of older hospitalised adults. All patients admitted into two hospitals in the South-East of England between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2022, aged ≥65 years old with an electronically recorded CFS were included. Results Over the study period there were 100 933 admissions, representing 53 361 individual patients. A single admission was observed in 16 284 (30.5%), whilst 37 077 (69.5%) had more than one admission. The mean CFS was 4.62 (SD 1.66) and 49.5% were living with frailty (CFS ≥5). Across 6 years, before, during and after the Covid-19 pandemic, this percentage remained stable. Females had a higher average CFS than males (4.74 vs 4.46, P < 0.01). Patients with a single admission had a higher mean CFS than patients with subsequent readmissions. Patients who died during admission had a higher average CFS than those who survived to discharge (6.02 vs 4.52, P < 0.01). Conclusion This large cohort study of acutely admitted older adults found half were living with frailty. This highlights the importance of frailty identification to optimise personalised care. There was no significant change in frailty severity between 2018 and 2022.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim To examine frailty assessments in older patients admitted to hospital, and explore associations with sex, admission and discharge status. Methodology Worldwide, the prevalence of frailty is increasing. Stratifying frailty can be beneficial at a population level to improve public health and target local services. At an individual level, recognition of frailty can help inform prognosis and advanced planning. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is validated for predicting outcomes of older hospitalised adults. All patients admitted into two hospitals in the South-East of England between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2022, aged ≥65 years old with an electronically recorded CFS were included. Results Over the study period there were 100 933 admissions, representing 53 361 individual patients. A single admission was observed in 16 284 (30.5%), whilst 37 077 (69.5%) had more than one admission. The mean CFS was 4.62 (SD 1.66) and 49.5% were living with frailty (CFS ≥5). Across 6 years, before, during and after the Covid-19 pandemic, this percentage remained stable. Females had a higher average CFS than males (4.74 vs 4.46, P < 0.01). Patients with a single admission had a higher mean CFS than patients with subsequent readmissions. Patients who died during admission had a higher average CFS than those who survived to discharge (6.02 vs 4.52, P < 0.01). Conclusion This large cohort study of acutely admitted older adults found half were living with frailty. This highlights the importance of frailty identification to optimise personalised care. There was no significant change in frailty severity between 2018 and 2022.
目的探讨老年住院患者的衰弱评估,并探讨其与性别、入院和出院状况的关系。在世界范围内,虚弱的患病率正在上升。在人口层面上,对脆弱进行分层可能有利于改善公共卫生和有针对性的地方服务。在个人层面上,认识到虚弱可以帮助告知预后和提前计划。临床虚弱量表(CFS)用于预测老年住院成年人的预后。纳入了2017年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间英格兰东南部两家医院收治的年龄≥65岁、电子记录CFS的所有患者。结果研究期间共入院100 933例,患者53 361例。一次入院16 284例(30.5%),一次以上入院37 077例(69.5%)。平均CFS为4.62 (SD 1.66), 49.5%伴有虚弱(CFS≥5)。在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前、期间和之后的6年里,这一比例保持稳定。女性的平均CFS高于男性(4.74 vs 4.46, P <;0.01)。单次入院患者的平均CFS高于随后再次入院的患者。入院时死亡的患者平均CFS高于存活至出院的患者(6.02 vs 4.52, P <;0.01)。结论:这项对急性入院的老年人的大型队列研究发现,一半的老年人生活在虚弱之中。这突出了虚弱识别对优化个性化护理的重要性。在2018年至2022年期间,虚弱的严重程度没有显著变化。
期刊介绍:
Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.