Performance of deep-learning-based approaches to improve polygenic scores

IF 15.7 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Martin Kelemen, Yu Xu, Tao Jiang, Jing Hua Zhao, Carl A. Anderson, Chris Wallace, Adam Butterworth, Michael Inouye
{"title":"Performance of deep-learning-based approaches to improve polygenic scores","authors":"Martin Kelemen, Yu Xu, Tao Jiang, Jing Hua Zhao, Carl A. Anderson, Chris Wallace, Adam Butterworth, Michael Inouye","doi":"10.1038/s41467-025-60056-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Polygenic scores, which estimate an individual’s genetic propensity for a disease or trait, have the potential to become part of genomic healthcare. Neural-network based deep-learning has emerged as a method of intense interest to model complex, nonlinear phenomena, which may be adapted to exploit gene-gene and gene-environment interactions to potentially improve polygenic scores. We fit neural-network models to both simulated and 28 real traits in the UK Biobank. To infer the amount of nonlinearity present in a phenotype, we also present a framework using neural-networks, which controls for the potential confounding effect of linkage disequilibrium. Although we found evidence for small amounts of nonlinear effects, neural-network models were outperformed by linear regression models for both genetic-only and genetic+environmental input scenarios. In this work, we find that the usefulness of neural-networks for generating polygenic scores may currently be limited and confounded by joint tagging effects due to linkage disequilibrium.</p>","PeriodicalId":19066,"journal":{"name":"Nature Communications","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Communications","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60056-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polygenic scores, which estimate an individual’s genetic propensity for a disease or trait, have the potential to become part of genomic healthcare. Neural-network based deep-learning has emerged as a method of intense interest to model complex, nonlinear phenomena, which may be adapted to exploit gene-gene and gene-environment interactions to potentially improve polygenic scores. We fit neural-network models to both simulated and 28 real traits in the UK Biobank. To infer the amount of nonlinearity present in a phenotype, we also present a framework using neural-networks, which controls for the potential confounding effect of linkage disequilibrium. Although we found evidence for small amounts of nonlinear effects, neural-network models were outperformed by linear regression models for both genetic-only and genetic+environmental input scenarios. In this work, we find that the usefulness of neural-networks for generating polygenic scores may currently be limited and confounded by joint tagging effects due to linkage disequilibrium.

Abstract Image

基于深度学习的提高多基因分数方法的性能
多基因评分,估计一个人对某种疾病或特征的遗传倾向,有可能成为基因组保健的一部分。基于神经网络的深度学习已经成为一种模拟复杂非线性现象的方法,它可以用于利用基因-基因和基因-环境的相互作用来潜在地提高多基因得分。我们将神经网络模型拟合到英国生物银行的模拟和28个真实特征中。为了推断表型中存在的非线性量,我们还提出了一个使用神经网络的框架,该框架控制了连锁不平衡的潜在混杂效应。尽管我们发现了少量非线性效应的证据,但在纯遗传和遗传+环境输入场景下,神经网络模型的表现都优于线性回归模型。在这项工作中,我们发现神经网络对生成多基因分数的有用性目前可能受到限制,并且由于链接不平衡而受到联合标记效应的混淆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Communications
Nature Communications Biological Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
24.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
6928
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: Nature Communications, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research spanning all areas of the natural sciences. Papers featured in the journal showcase significant advances relevant to specialists in each respective field. With a 2-year impact factor of 16.6 (2022) and a median time of 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision, Nature Communications is committed to rapid dissemination of research findings. As a multidisciplinary journal, it welcomes contributions from biological, health, physical, chemical, Earth, social, mathematical, applied, and engineering sciences, aiming to highlight important breakthroughs within each domain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信