Identification of Affective- and Social-Reinforcement Functions of Driven Exercise: Evidence From Three Samples.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Clinical Psychological Science Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-14 DOI:10.1177/21677026241290455
David R Kolar, Ann F Haynos, Shirley B Wang, Theresa Lask, Stuart B Murray, Ulrich Voderholzer, Sasha Gorrell
{"title":"Identification of Affective- and Social-Reinforcement Functions of Driven Exercise: Evidence From Three Samples.","authors":"David R Kolar, Ann F Haynos, Shirley B Wang, Theresa Lask, Stuart B Murray, Ulrich Voderholzer, Sasha Gorrell","doi":"10.1177/21677026241290455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Driven exercise is a transdiagnostic maladaptive behavior, especially common in eating disorders (ED); however, its maintenance mechanisms remain poorly understood. To address this gap, we examined the applicability of previously empirically-derived and validated reinforcement function models in explaining driven exercise maintenance in studies varying across developmental stages and clinical presentations (Study 1: <i>N</i>=279 adolescents/adults oversampled for EDs; Study 2: <i>N</i>=118 adolescent/adult inpatients with severe EDs; Study 3: <i>N</i>=52 adults oversampled for athletes and/or EDs). Results supported the utility of a four-function model (automatic positive/negative reinforcement [APR/ANR; increase/decrease negative affect], social positive/negative reinforcement [SPR/SNR; engage in/avoid interpersonal situations]) in explaining driven exercise. APR was most frequently endorsed, followed by ANR, SNR, and SPR in all studies. APR correlated with last-month driven exercise episodes across studies; associations between other functions and ED psychopathology varied between studies. Further, results suggested a separate control function could be considered in samples with more severe EDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":"13 3","pages":"582-597"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026241290455","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Driven exercise is a transdiagnostic maladaptive behavior, especially common in eating disorders (ED); however, its maintenance mechanisms remain poorly understood. To address this gap, we examined the applicability of previously empirically-derived and validated reinforcement function models in explaining driven exercise maintenance in studies varying across developmental stages and clinical presentations (Study 1: N=279 adolescents/adults oversampled for EDs; Study 2: N=118 adolescent/adult inpatients with severe EDs; Study 3: N=52 adults oversampled for athletes and/or EDs). Results supported the utility of a four-function model (automatic positive/negative reinforcement [APR/ANR; increase/decrease negative affect], social positive/negative reinforcement [SPR/SNR; engage in/avoid interpersonal situations]) in explaining driven exercise. APR was most frequently endorsed, followed by ANR, SNR, and SPR in all studies. APR correlated with last-month driven exercise episodes across studies; associations between other functions and ED psychopathology varied between studies. Further, results suggested a separate control function could be considered in samples with more severe EDs.

驱动运动的情感和社会强化功能的识别:来自三个样本的证据。
驱动运动是一种跨诊断性的适应不良行为,在饮食失调(ED)中尤为常见;然而,其维持机制仍然知之甚少。为了解决这一差距,我们检查了先前经验推导和验证的强化功能模型在解释不同发育阶段和临床表现的研究中驱动运动维持的适用性(研究1:N=279名青少年/成人ed过采样;研究2:118例青少年/成人重症急诊科住院患者;研究3:N=52名成人(运动员和/或急诊医生)。结果支持四功能模型(自动正/负强化[APR/ANR;增加/减少负面影响],社会正/负强化[SPR/SNR];参与/避免人际交往])解释驱动练习。在所有研究中,APR是最常被认可的,其次是ANR、SNR和SPR。在所有研究中,APR与上个月的运动次数相关;其他功能与ED精神病理之间的关系在不同的研究中有所不同。此外,结果表明,在更严重的EDs样品中可以考虑单独的控制函数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychological Science
Clinical Psychological Science Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Association for Psychological Science’s journal, Clinical Psychological Science, emerges from this confluence to provide readers with the best, most innovative research in clinical psychological science, giving researchers of all stripes a home for their work and a place in which to communicate with a broad audience of both clinical and other scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信