Worry, gait speed, and inflammation as predictors of processing speed in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairments (aMCI).

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jovian C Lam, Lisa N Cruz, Mary Hong-Hoang T Nguyen, J Kaci Fairchild
{"title":"Worry, gait speed, and inflammation as predictors of processing speed in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairments (aMCI).","authors":"Jovian C Lam, Lisa N Cruz, Mary Hong-Hoang T Nguyen, J Kaci Fairchild","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2496748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Efficient processing speed is important for quality of life and can buffer against further cognitive declines for older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). Etiologies of processing speed impairments are multifactorial. Slow gait and chronic worry have been suggested to be precursors to cognitive decline in older adults. Furthermore, both slow gait and worry involve inflammatory processes, which contribute to dementia conversion in those with MCI. Despite these links to cognitive decline, no study to date has examined the cumulative association of gait, worry, and inflammation on processing speed. Given the need to study processing speed through a multidisciplinary lens, the current study investigates the contributions of biological (inflammation), physiological (gait speed), and psychological (worry) factors to processing speed in older adults with aMCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants include 65 community-dwelling older adults with aMCI. Linear regressions were used to (1) assess the contributions of each predictor (gait, inflammation, worry) and (2) compare each predictor versus their cumulative contribution to processing speed, controlling for age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative contribution of gait, worry, and inflammation significantly predicted processing speed compared to just gait alone, with worry being a significant predictor. No significant difference was found when compared to separate models of worry and inflammation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Worry, even at a subclinical level, showed a significant negative association to processing speed. Interestingly, the contribution of worry on processing speed is more pronounced when considering other health factors, reinforcing the importance of a bio-physio-psychological perspective in cognitive aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2496748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Efficient processing speed is important for quality of life and can buffer against further cognitive declines for older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). Etiologies of processing speed impairments are multifactorial. Slow gait and chronic worry have been suggested to be precursors to cognitive decline in older adults. Furthermore, both slow gait and worry involve inflammatory processes, which contribute to dementia conversion in those with MCI. Despite these links to cognitive decline, no study to date has examined the cumulative association of gait, worry, and inflammation on processing speed. Given the need to study processing speed through a multidisciplinary lens, the current study investigates the contributions of biological (inflammation), physiological (gait speed), and psychological (worry) factors to processing speed in older adults with aMCI.

Methods: Participants include 65 community-dwelling older adults with aMCI. Linear regressions were used to (1) assess the contributions of each predictor (gait, inflammation, worry) and (2) compare each predictor versus their cumulative contribution to processing speed, controlling for age.

Results: The cumulative contribution of gait, worry, and inflammation significantly predicted processing speed compared to just gait alone, with worry being a significant predictor. No significant difference was found when compared to separate models of worry and inflammation.

Conclusions: Worry, even at a subclinical level, showed a significant negative association to processing speed. Interestingly, the contribution of worry on processing speed is more pronounced when considering other health factors, reinforcing the importance of a bio-physio-psychological perspective in cognitive aging.

焦虑、步态速度和炎症作为健忘轻度认知障碍(aMCI)老年人处理速度的预测因子。
目的:有效的处理速度对生活质量很重要,可以缓冲老年遗忘性轻度认知障碍(aMCI)患者进一步的认知衰退。处理速度障碍的病因是多因素的。步态缓慢和长期焦虑被认为是老年人认知能力下降的先兆。此外,步态缓慢和焦虑都涉及炎症过程,这有助于轻度认知障碍患者的痴呆转化。尽管这些与认知能力下降有关,但迄今为止还没有研究调查步态、担忧和炎症与处理速度的累积关系。考虑到需要通过多学科的视角来研究处理速度,目前的研究调查了生物(炎症)、生理(步态速度)和心理(担忧)因素对老年aMCI处理速度的影响。方法:参与者包括65名社区居住的老年aMCI患者。线性回归用于(1)评估每个预测因素(步态、炎症、担忧)的贡献;(2)在控制年龄的情况下,将每个预测因素与其对处理速度的累积贡献进行比较。结果:与单纯步态相比,步态、焦虑和炎症的累积贡献显著地预测了处理速度,其中焦虑是一个显著的预测因子。与焦虑和炎症的单独模型相比,没有发现显著差异。结论:焦虑,即使是亚临床水平,也与处理速度呈显著负相关。有趣的是,当考虑到其他健康因素时,担忧对处理速度的贡献更为明显,这加强了生物生理心理视角在认知衰老中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信