In-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility results of Brucella species; Single center study from Eastern Türkiye.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Merve Kılıç Tekin, Enes Erbağcı, Neşe İnal
{"title":"In-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility results of Brucella species; Single center study from Eastern Türkiye.","authors":"Merve Kılıç Tekin, Enes Erbağcı, Neşe İnal","doi":"10.3855/jidc.20643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Brucellosis is the most common zoonotic infection worldwide. The disease imposes significant economic burdens and public health challenges. Due to documented instances of treatment failures, relapses, and resistance, regular monitoring of antimicrobial susceptibility is essential. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of Brucella spp. against antimicrobial agents.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study was conducted at a tertiary state hospital from January 2023 to June 2024. Species level identification was performed using the VITEK-2 Compact system and 16S rRNA analysis. Isolated strains were cultured on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% horse blood and β-Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (β-NAD), followed by testing with antibiotic discs. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed according to the EUCAST 2024 version 14 recommendations. Zone diameters were categorized as susceptible, standard dosing regimen; susceptible, increased exposure and resistant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>45 Brucella species isolated from blood culture were included in this study. Species level determination showed Brucella melitensis in 36 (80%) and Brucella abortus in 9 (20%) patients by 16S rRNA analysis. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were as follows: gentamicin, rifampicin, ceftriaxone, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and streptomycin all showed 100% susceptibility. Conversely, levofloxacin had a susceptibility rate of 15.5%, and ciprofloxacin had a rate of 4.4%. No resistance was detected for levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin, and there were no significant differences in susceptibility between Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights increased exposure patterns for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, indicating potential future resistance issues. Regular monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in Brucella isolates is crucial for effective disease management and updating treatment guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":49160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","volume":"19 5","pages":"732-738"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.20643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Brucellosis is the most common zoonotic infection worldwide. The disease imposes significant economic burdens and public health challenges. Due to documented instances of treatment failures, relapses, and resistance, regular monitoring of antimicrobial susceptibility is essential. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of Brucella spp. against antimicrobial agents.

Methodology: The study was conducted at a tertiary state hospital from January 2023 to June 2024. Species level identification was performed using the VITEK-2 Compact system and 16S rRNA analysis. Isolated strains were cultured on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% horse blood and β-Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (β-NAD), followed by testing with antibiotic discs. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed according to the EUCAST 2024 version 14 recommendations. Zone diameters were categorized as susceptible, standard dosing regimen; susceptible, increased exposure and resistant.

Results: 45 Brucella species isolated from blood culture were included in this study. Species level determination showed Brucella melitensis in 36 (80%) and Brucella abortus in 9 (20%) patients by 16S rRNA analysis. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were as follows: gentamicin, rifampicin, ceftriaxone, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and streptomycin all showed 100% susceptibility. Conversely, levofloxacin had a susceptibility rate of 15.5%, and ciprofloxacin had a rate of 4.4%. No resistance was detected for levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin, and there were no significant differences in susceptibility between Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus.

Conclusions: The study highlights increased exposure patterns for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, indicating potential future resistance issues. Regular monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in Brucella isolates is crucial for effective disease management and updating treatment guidelines.

布鲁氏菌的体外药敏结果东部 rkiye的单中心研究。
布鲁氏菌病是世界上最常见的人畜共患感染。这种疾病造成了重大的经济负担和公共卫生挑战。由于治疗失败、复发和耐药的记录,定期监测抗菌药物敏感性至关重要。本研究旨在评价布鲁氏菌对抗菌药物的敏感性。方法:研究于2023年1月至2024年6月在一家三级公立医院进行。采用VITEK-2 Compact系统和16S rRNA分析进行物种水平鉴定。分离菌株在添加5%马血和β-烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸(β-NAD)的muller - hinton琼脂培养基上培养,然后用抗生素片检测。抗菌药物敏感性试验按照EUCAST 2024版14的建议进行。区直径被分类为敏感,标准给药方案;易感,暴露增加,耐药。结果:从血培养中分离到45种布鲁氏菌。16S rRNA分析结果显示36例(80%)为melitensis布鲁氏菌,9例(20%)为abortus布鲁氏菌。药敏情况:庆大霉素、利福平、头孢曲松、四环素、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑、链霉素均为100%药敏。相反,左氧氟沙星的易感性为15.5%,环丙沙星的易感性为4.4%。对左氧氟沙星和环丙沙星均未发现耐药,对美利氏布鲁氏菌和流产布鲁氏菌的敏感性无显著差异。结论:该研究强调了环丙沙星和左氧氟沙星暴露模式的增加,表明潜在的未来耐药性问题。定期监测布鲁氏菌分离株的抗微生物药物耐药性对于有效的疾病管理和更新治疗指南至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
239
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries (JIDC) is an international journal, intended for the publication of scientific articles from Developing Countries by scientists from Developing Countries. JIDC is an independent, on-line publication with an international editorial board. JIDC is open access with no cost to view or download articles and reasonable cost for publication of research artcles, making JIDC easily availiable to scientists from resource restricted regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信