New Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) Based on Ultrasonography Features for Follicular Thyroid Neoplasms: A Multicenter Study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Bo-Ji Liu, Yun-Yun Liu, Jing Wan, Ying Zhang, Di Ou, Hong-Feng He, John P Pineda, Hong Han, Yi-Feng Zhang, Hui-Xiong Xu
{"title":"New Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) Based on Ultrasonography Features for Follicular Thyroid Neoplasms: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Bo-Ji Liu, Yun-Yun Liu, Jing Wan, Ying Zhang, Di Ou, Hong-Feng He, John P Pineda, Hong Han, Yi-Feng Zhang, Hui-Xiong Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Preoperative diagnosis of follicular thyroid neoplasm (FTN) (including follicular thyroid adenoma [FTA] and follicular thyroid carcinoma [FTC]) is difficult and the current ultrasound risk stratification systems (RSSs) for thyroid nodules are not suitable for FTN. Therefore, this study aimed to establish a new RSS for FTN as a useful preoperative evaluation to reduce missed diagnoses and unnecessary biopsies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 535 FTNs from four hospitals in this retrospective study. All nodules were divided randomly into a test group (n = 370; 111 FTCs and 259 FTAs) and a validation group (n = 165; 51 FTCs and 114 FTAs). The ultrasound features of each nodule were analyzed. Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) of FTN (FTN-TIRADS) was established based on the results of univariate analysis and logistic regression of ultrasound features. Each nodule was evaluated and classified by these four RSSs (RSS from European Thyroid Association [EU-RSS], RSS from the American Thyroid Association [ATA-RSS], TIRADS from the American College of Radiology [ACR-TIRADS], TIRADS from China [C-TIRADS]) and FTN-TIRADS, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed and the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of the RSSs mentioned above. The diagnostic value of FTN-TIRADS in the validation group was verified and compared with the test group and other four RSSs. The unnecessary rates of fine needle aspiration (FNA) were calculated and compared between FTN-RIRADS and the other four RSSs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The test group and validation group included 370 patients (86 male patients) and 165 patients (48 male patients). The following ultrasound features were independent risk factors and included in FTN-TIRADS: nodule composition, echogenicity, calcifications, halo sign, indistinct boundary with the thyroid capsule. Nodules were classified as TR2, TR3, TR4a, TR4b, TR4c, and TR5 with none to five suspicious features described, respectively. The AUC of FTN-TIRADS was 0.855, statistically higher than EU-RSS, ATA-RSS, ACR-TIRADS and C-TIRADS (0.759, 0.759, 0.753, and 0.677, respectively) (all p < 0.05). The FTN-TIRADS of the validation group had similar diagnostic performance to that of the test group (AUC 0.879 vs. AUC 0.855; p = 0.569). The unnecessary FNA rate of the FTN-TIRADS was 41.4%, which was significantly lower than that of EU-RSS (67.3%), ATA-RSS (69.0%), ACR-TIRADS (60.1%), and C-TIRADS (63.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FTN-TIRADS achieved better differential diagnosis of FTN than current RSSs and significantly reduced the rate of unnecessary FNA. It can serve as a reliable preoperative noninvasive assessment tool for thyroid follicular tumors, reducing unnecessary FNA and unnecessary surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.05.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Preoperative diagnosis of follicular thyroid neoplasm (FTN) (including follicular thyroid adenoma [FTA] and follicular thyroid carcinoma [FTC]) is difficult and the current ultrasound risk stratification systems (RSSs) for thyroid nodules are not suitable for FTN. Therefore, this study aimed to establish a new RSS for FTN as a useful preoperative evaluation to reduce missed diagnoses and unnecessary biopsies.

Methods: We included 535 FTNs from four hospitals in this retrospective study. All nodules were divided randomly into a test group (n = 370; 111 FTCs and 259 FTAs) and a validation group (n = 165; 51 FTCs and 114 FTAs). The ultrasound features of each nodule were analyzed. Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) of FTN (FTN-TIRADS) was established based on the results of univariate analysis and logistic regression of ultrasound features. Each nodule was evaluated and classified by these four RSSs (RSS from European Thyroid Association [EU-RSS], RSS from the American Thyroid Association [ATA-RSS], TIRADS from the American College of Radiology [ACR-TIRADS], TIRADS from China [C-TIRADS]) and FTN-TIRADS, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed and the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of the RSSs mentioned above. The diagnostic value of FTN-TIRADS in the validation group was verified and compared with the test group and other four RSSs. The unnecessary rates of fine needle aspiration (FNA) were calculated and compared between FTN-RIRADS and the other four RSSs.

Results: The test group and validation group included 370 patients (86 male patients) and 165 patients (48 male patients). The following ultrasound features were independent risk factors and included in FTN-TIRADS: nodule composition, echogenicity, calcifications, halo sign, indistinct boundary with the thyroid capsule. Nodules were classified as TR2, TR3, TR4a, TR4b, TR4c, and TR5 with none to five suspicious features described, respectively. The AUC of FTN-TIRADS was 0.855, statistically higher than EU-RSS, ATA-RSS, ACR-TIRADS and C-TIRADS (0.759, 0.759, 0.753, and 0.677, respectively) (all p < 0.05). The FTN-TIRADS of the validation group had similar diagnostic performance to that of the test group (AUC 0.879 vs. AUC 0.855; p = 0.569). The unnecessary FNA rate of the FTN-TIRADS was 41.4%, which was significantly lower than that of EU-RSS (67.3%), ATA-RSS (69.0%), ACR-TIRADS (60.1%), and C-TIRADS (63.2%).

Conclusions: FTN-TIRADS achieved better differential diagnosis of FTN than current RSSs and significantly reduced the rate of unnecessary FNA. It can serve as a reliable preoperative noninvasive assessment tool for thyroid follicular tumors, reducing unnecessary FNA and unnecessary surgeries.

基于滤泡性甲状腺肿瘤超声特征的新型甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TIRADS):一项多中心研究。
目的:甲状腺滤泡性肿瘤(FTN)(包括滤泡性甲状腺腺瘤(FTA)和滤泡性甲状腺癌(FTC))术前诊断困难,目前甲状腺结节超声风险分层系统(RSSs)不适合FTN。因此,本研究旨在为FTN建立一种新的RSS,作为一种有用的术前评估,以减少漏诊和不必要的活检。方法:我们纳入了来自4家医院的535名ftn进行回顾性研究。所有结节随机分为实验组(n = 370;111个FTCs和259个FTCs)和一个验证组(n = 165;51个自由贸易协定和114个自由贸易协定)。分析各结节的超声特征。基于超声特征的单因素分析和logistic回归结果,建立FTN甲状腺影像报告与数据系统(FTN-TIRADS)。每个结节分别通过这四种RSS(欧洲甲状腺协会的RSS [EU-RSS]、美国甲状腺协会的RSS [ATA-RSS]、美国放射学会的TIRADS [ACR-TIRADS]、中国的TIRADS [C-TIRADS])和FTN-TIRADS进行评估和分类。进行受试者工作特征曲线分析,采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评价上述RSSs的诊断价值。验证组FTN-TIRADS的诊断价值,并与试验组及其他4种rss进行比较。计算并比较FTN-RIRADS与其他4种rss的不必要细针抽吸率。结果:试验组370例(男86例),验证组165例(男48例)。以下超声特征是独立的危险因素,包括FTN-TIRADS:结节组成、回声性、钙化、晕征、与甲状腺包膜边界不清。结节分类为TR2、TR3、TR4a、TR4b、TR4c和TR5,分别无至5个可疑特征。FTN-TIRADS的AUC为0.855,高于EU-RSS、ATA-RSS、ACR-TIRADS、C-TIRADS(分别为0.759、0.759、0.753、0.677),差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。验证组的FTN-TIRADS与试验组的诊断性能相似(AUC 0.879 vs AUC 0.855;P = 0.569)。FTN-TIRADS的不必要FNA率为41.4%,显著低于EU-RSS(67.3%)、ATA-RSS(69.0%)、ACR-TIRADS(60.1%)和C-TIRADS(63.2%)。结论:FTN- tirads对FTN的鉴别诊断优于现有的RSSs,并显著降低了不必要的FNA率。可作为甲状腺滤泡性肿瘤的可靠的术前无创评估工具,减少不必要的FNA和不必要的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
325
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信