Weibo Zeng, Yanni He, Renhao Xu, Wuping Mai, Yufan Chen, Sushu Li, Wenhong Yi, Li Ma, Ran Xiong, Hongmei Liu
{"title":"From Guidelines to Intelligence: How AI Refines Thyroid Nodule Biopsy Decisions.","authors":"Weibo Zeng, Yanni He, Renhao Xu, Wuping Mai, Yufan Chen, Sushu Li, Wenhong Yi, Li Ma, Ran Xiong, Hongmei Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the value of combining American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) with the Demetics ultrasound diagnostic system in reducing the rate of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies for thyroid nodules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study analyzed 548 thyroid nodules from 454 patients, all meeting ACR TI-RADS guidelines (category ≥3 and diameter ≥10 mm) for FNA. Nodule was reclassified using the combined ACR TI-RADS and Demetics system (De TI-RADS), and the biopsy rates were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using ACR TI-RADS alone, the biopsy rate was 70.6% (387/548), with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 52.5% (203/387), an unnecessary biopsy rate of 47.5% (184/387) and a missed diagnosis rate of 11.0% (25/228). Incorporating Demetics reduced the biopsy rate to 48.1% (264/548), the unnecessary biopsy rate to 17.4% (46/265) and the missed diagnosis rate to 4.4% (10/228), while increasing PPV to 82.6% (218/264). All differences between ACR TI-RADS and De TI-RADS were statistically significant (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integration of ACR TI-RADS with the Demetics system improves nodule risk assessment by enhancing diagnostic and efficiency. This approach reduces unnecessary biopsies and missed diagnoses while increasing PPV, offering a more reliable tool for clinicians and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.05.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the value of combining American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) with the Demetics ultrasound diagnostic system in reducing the rate of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies for thyroid nodules.
Methods: A retrospective study analyzed 548 thyroid nodules from 454 patients, all meeting ACR TI-RADS guidelines (category ≥3 and diameter ≥10 mm) for FNA. Nodule was reclassified using the combined ACR TI-RADS and Demetics system (De TI-RADS), and the biopsy rates were compared.
Results: Using ACR TI-RADS alone, the biopsy rate was 70.6% (387/548), with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 52.5% (203/387), an unnecessary biopsy rate of 47.5% (184/387) and a missed diagnosis rate of 11.0% (25/228). Incorporating Demetics reduced the biopsy rate to 48.1% (264/548), the unnecessary biopsy rate to 17.4% (46/265) and the missed diagnosis rate to 4.4% (10/228), while increasing PPV to 82.6% (218/264). All differences between ACR TI-RADS and De TI-RADS were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The integration of ACR TI-RADS with the Demetics system improves nodule risk assessment by enhancing diagnostic and efficiency. This approach reduces unnecessary biopsies and missed diagnoses while increasing PPV, offering a more reliable tool for clinicians and patients.
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.