Physical Literacy Profile Questionnaire (PLP-Quest): Development and Measurement Properties for Children and Youth with Disabilities.

IF 1.5 4区医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS

Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-06-02 DOI:10.1080/01942638.2025.2509545

Rafaela G Ferreira, Mariane G Souza, João Victor B Oliveira, Karen C S Chaves, Luana C Silva, Lourdes C C Montenegro, Marcos Antônio C Santos, Georgina L Clutterbuck, Ricardo R S Junior, Hércules R Leite

{"title":"Physical Literacy Profile Questionnaire (PLP-Quest): Development and Measurement Properties for Children and Youth with Disabilities.","authors":"Rafaela G Ferreira, Mariane G Souza, João Victor B Oliveira, Karen C S Chaves, Luana C Silva, Lourdes C C Montenegro, Marcos Antônio C Santos, Georgina L Clutterbuck, Ricardo R S Junior, Hércules R Leite","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2025.2509545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To develop the Physical Literacy Profile Questionnaire (PLP-Quest) for children, adolescents, and young adults with disabilities and to assess its measurement properties.Method: The PLP-Quest was developed based on the physical literacy framework proposed by the Australian Sports Commission, and following the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria for instrument development. After development, the following PLP-Quest measurement properties were investigated: content validity, structural validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability.Results: All PLP-Quest items were considered relevant and comprehensive by 50 caregivers and 50 health professionals. In structural validity analysis, with 109 responses, two items were removed, resulting in a final set of 22 items in PLP-Quests' final version. There was predominance of a single factor in the principal component analysis, confirming unidimensionality. Cronbach's alpha analysis showed that the instrument had good internal consistency (α = 0.93). The analysis of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed that the instrument had good test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87-0.96).Interpretation: Preliminary assessments of the measurement properties of the PLP-Quest indicate that this instrument has the potential to assess physical literacy in children, adolescents, and young adults with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2025.2509545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To develop the Physical Literacy Profile Questionnaire (PLP-Quest) for children, adolescents, and young adults with disabilities and to assess its measurement properties.

Method: The PLP-Quest was developed based on the physical literacy framework proposed by the Australian Sports Commission, and following the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria for instrument development. After development, the following PLP-Quest measurement properties were investigated: content validity, structural validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability.

Results: All PLP-Quest items were considered relevant and comprehensive by 50 caregivers and 50 health professionals. In structural validity analysis, with 109 responses, two items were removed, resulting in a final set of 22 items in PLP-Quests' final version. There was predominance of a single factor in the principal component analysis, confirming unidimensionality. Cronbach's alpha analysis showed that the instrument had good internal consistency (α = 0.93). The analysis of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed that the instrument had good test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87-0.96).

Interpretation: Preliminary assessments of the measurement properties of the PLP-Quest indicate that this instrument has the potential to assess physical literacy in children, adolescents, and young adults with disabilities.

查看原文本刊更多论文

体育素养调查问卷（PLP-Quest）：残疾儿童和青少年的发展和测量特性。

目的：编制面向残疾儿童、青少年和青年成人的体育素养概况问卷（PLP-Quest），并评估其测量特性。方法：PLP-Quest基于澳大利亚体育委员会提出的身体素养框架，并遵循基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准（COSMIN）的工具开发标准。开发完成后，对PLP-Quest量表的内容效度、结构效度、内部一致性和重测信度进行了研究。结果：50名护理人员和50名卫生专业人员认为所有PLP-Quest项目都是相关的和全面的。在结构效度分析中，109份问卷被剔除了2份，最终得到了PLP-Quests最终版本的22份问卷。主成分分析中单因素占优势，证实了单维性。Cronbach's alpha分析显示，该仪器具有良好的内部一致性（α = 0.93）。类内相关系数（ICC）分析表明，该仪器具有良好的重测信度（ICC= 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87 ~ 0.96）。解释：对PLP-Quest测量特性的初步评估表明，该仪器具有评估残疾儿童、青少年和年轻成人身体素养的潜力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-REHABILITATION

CiteScore

3.70

自引率

4.80%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： 5 issues per year Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine