Intervening on Calorie Intake or Eating Timing in Older Adults: Lessons Learned in the Healthy Aging and Late-Life Outcomes Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Interventions in Aging Pub Date : 2025-05-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CIA.S520273
Jason Fanning, W Jack Rejeski, Barbara J Nicklas, Stephen B Kritchevsky, Michael E Miller, Denise K Houston, Michael P Walkup, Kimberly Kennedy, Cynthia L Stowe, Sherri Ford, Dixie Yow
{"title":"Intervening on Calorie Intake or Eating Timing in Older Adults: Lessons Learned in the Healthy Aging and Late-Life Outcomes Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.","authors":"Jason Fanning, W Jack Rejeski, Barbara J Nicklas, Stephen B Kritchevsky, Michael E Miller, Denise K Houston, Michael P Walkup, Kimberly Kennedy, Cynthia L Stowe, Sherri Ford, Dixie Yow","doi":"10.2147/CIA.S520273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Healthy Aging and Late Life Outcomes Pilot (HALLO-P) trial was designed to pilot in-person and remotely delivered caloric restriction (CR and RCR respectively) and time restricted eating (TRE) in preparation for a long-term multi-site clinical trial. Herein, we describe the development and execution of these behavioral interventions with a focus on lessons learned and post-study questionnaire data.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Participants were community-dwelling older (60+ yrs) adults with obesity or overweight with an indication for weight loss. Participants were randomized to 9 months of group-based CR, RCR, or TRE supported by self-monitoring technologies [ie, a tablet application paired with an activity monitor (all) and wireless scale (CR and RCR)]. Intervention staff recorded attendance at sessions and noted intervention-related lessons learned as they arose. Upon completion of the study period, participants were asked to complete a series of Likert-type and open-ended questions related to their experiences in the trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (N = 90; 67.19 ± 4.91 years) attended 84.4% of sessions on average, engaged with study technologies 96.4% of days, and provided daily weights on >4 days per week across the study (CR and RCR only). Participants reported high satisfaction with the program, with RCR participants being significantly more likely than TRE participants to report being satisfied with their program overall (100% vs 75%, p < 0.01), intending to continue their dietary change post-intervention (97% vs 63%, p < 0.01), and being willing to sustain their dietary approach and engage with study technologies over a 5-year period (88% vs 61%, p < 0.01). Open-ended feedback underscored the value of the group-based structure of the program and remote delivery to reduce travel burden, the need for reduced burden associated with food logging, and the need to identify methods for enhancing perceived value of TRE among older adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An intervention designed to promote CR, primarily delivered remotely and supported by self-monitoring technology, is both feasible and acceptable to many older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":48841,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":"20 ","pages":"685-700"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12123093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S520273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Healthy Aging and Late Life Outcomes Pilot (HALLO-P) trial was designed to pilot in-person and remotely delivered caloric restriction (CR and RCR respectively) and time restricted eating (TRE) in preparation for a long-term multi-site clinical trial. Herein, we describe the development and execution of these behavioral interventions with a focus on lessons learned and post-study questionnaire data.

Patients and methods: Participants were community-dwelling older (60+ yrs) adults with obesity or overweight with an indication for weight loss. Participants were randomized to 9 months of group-based CR, RCR, or TRE supported by self-monitoring technologies [ie, a tablet application paired with an activity monitor (all) and wireless scale (CR and RCR)]. Intervention staff recorded attendance at sessions and noted intervention-related lessons learned as they arose. Upon completion of the study period, participants were asked to complete a series of Likert-type and open-ended questions related to their experiences in the trial.

Results: Participants (N = 90; 67.19 ± 4.91 years) attended 84.4% of sessions on average, engaged with study technologies 96.4% of days, and provided daily weights on >4 days per week across the study (CR and RCR only). Participants reported high satisfaction with the program, with RCR participants being significantly more likely than TRE participants to report being satisfied with their program overall (100% vs 75%, p < 0.01), intending to continue their dietary change post-intervention (97% vs 63%, p < 0.01), and being willing to sustain their dietary approach and engage with study technologies over a 5-year period (88% vs 61%, p < 0.01). Open-ended feedback underscored the value of the group-based structure of the program and remote delivery to reduce travel burden, the need for reduced burden associated with food logging, and the need to identify methods for enhancing perceived value of TRE among older adults.

Conclusion: An intervention designed to promote CR, primarily delivered remotely and supported by self-monitoring technology, is both feasible and acceptable to many older adults.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

干预老年人卡路里摄入或进食时间:健康老龄化和晚年结果随机对照试验的经验教训。
目的:健康老龄化和晚年结局试点(hallop)试验旨在试点现场和远程提供热量限制(CR和RCR分别)和限时饮食(TRE),为长期多地点临床试验做准备。在此,我们描述了这些行为干预的发展和执行,重点是经验教训和研究后问卷调查数据。患者和方法:参与者是社区居住的老年(60岁以上)肥胖或超重且有减肥指征的成年人。参与者被随机分配到9个月的基于小组的CR, RCR或TRE,并由自我监测技术支持[即,与活动监视器(所有)和无线秤(CR和RCR)配对的平板电脑应用程序]。干预工作人员记录了参加会议的情况,并注意到与干预有关的经验教训。在研究期结束后,参与者被要求完成一系列与他们在试验中的经历相关的李克特型开放式问题。结果:受试者(N = 90;67.19±4.91岁)平均参加了84.4%的会议,96.4%的天数参与了研究技术,并在整个研究期间每周提供40至40天的每日体重(仅CR和RCR)。参与者报告了对计划的高满意度,RCR参与者比TRE参与者更有可能报告对他们的计划总体满意(100%对75%,p < 0.01),打算在干预后继续他们的饮食改变(97%对63%,p < 0.01),并且愿意在5年内维持他们的饮食方法并参与研究技术(88%对61%,p < 0.01)。开放式反馈强调了以小组为基础的项目结构和远程交付的价值,以减轻旅行负担,需要减少与食物记录相关的负担,需要确定提高老年人对TRE的感知价值的方法。结论:旨在促进CR的干预措施,主要是远程提供和自我监测技术的支持,对许多老年人来说是可行和可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Clinical Interventions in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
193
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信