Inhaled Triple Therapy with Extrafine Single Inhaler Versus Multiple Devices in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (TRIPOLI): A Post-Authorization Retrospective Study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Eva Cabrera César, Javier López García, Daniel Enrique Vega Lizarazo, Miguel Benítez-Cano Gamonoso, Mercedes Segura Romero, Sara Sanchez Martín, Mónica I León Nieto, Diego González-Segura Alsina, José Luis Velasco Garrido
{"title":"Inhaled Triple Therapy with Extrafine Single Inhaler Versus Multiple Devices in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (TRIPOLI): A Post-Authorization Retrospective Study.","authors":"Eva Cabrera César, Javier López García, Daniel Enrique Vega Lizarazo, Miguel Benítez-Cano Gamonoso, Mercedes Segura Romero, Sara Sanchez Martín, Mónica I León Nieto, Diego González-Segura Alsina, José Luis Velasco Garrido","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S513351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Triple therapy significantly enhances both clinical and functional outcomes in patients with uncontrolled chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), even when they are already receiving treatment. However, it is often prescribed with multiple inhalers, which can affect adherence to treatment. The evidence on the effectiveness of extrafine single inhaler triple therapy (efSITT) compared to multiple inhalers triple therapy (MITT) in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD in the real-world setting is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TRIPOLI was a unicentric retrospective observational study that compared one year of efSITT with beclomethasone dipropionate, formoterol fumarate dihydrate, and glycopyrronium with one year of MITT in terms of exacerbations, use of rescue medication, adherence, and lung function in patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 71 patients were analyzed. The mean number of total and moderate exacerbations showed a significant reduction of 27.56% (p = 0.0043) and 29.56% (p = 0.0008), respectively, after efSITT. The percentage of patients with poor adherence decreased from 30.2% to 9.9% with efSITT and the proportion of patients with complete adherence increased from 55.8% to 81.7%. An improvement of 2.29% was described in mean forced expiratory volume in the first second (% pred). No differences were observed in the rate of pneumonia between the treatment with efSITT and MITT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TRIPOLI study suggests that switching from MITT to efSITT might reduce exacerbations in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, likely attributable to improved adherence in real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"1737-1747"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12126107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S513351","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Triple therapy significantly enhances both clinical and functional outcomes in patients with uncontrolled chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), even when they are already receiving treatment. However, it is often prescribed with multiple inhalers, which can affect adherence to treatment. The evidence on the effectiveness of extrafine single inhaler triple therapy (efSITT) compared to multiple inhalers triple therapy (MITT) in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD in the real-world setting is limited.

Methods: TRIPOLI was a unicentric retrospective observational study that compared one year of efSITT with beclomethasone dipropionate, formoterol fumarate dihydrate, and glycopyrronium with one year of MITT in terms of exacerbations, use of rescue medication, adherence, and lung function in patients with COPD.

Results: A total of 71 patients were analyzed. The mean number of total and moderate exacerbations showed a significant reduction of 27.56% (p = 0.0043) and 29.56% (p = 0.0008), respectively, after efSITT. The percentage of patients with poor adherence decreased from 30.2% to 9.9% with efSITT and the proportion of patients with complete adherence increased from 55.8% to 81.7%. An improvement of 2.29% was described in mean forced expiratory volume in the first second (% pred). No differences were observed in the rate of pneumonia between the treatment with efSITT and MITT.

Conclusion: The TRIPOLI study suggests that switching from MITT to efSITT might reduce exacerbations in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, likely attributable to improved adherence in real-world settings.

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(TRIPOLI)的吸入三联疗法:一项授权后的回顾性研究
背景:三联疗法可显著提高未控制的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的临床和功能结局,即使他们已经接受了治疗。然而,处方中经常使用多个吸入器,这可能影响治疗的坚持性。在现实世界中,与多吸入器三联治疗(MITT)相比,体外单吸入器三联治疗(efSITT)对中重度COPD患者的有效性证据有限。方法:TRIPOLI是一项单中心回顾性观察性研究,比较了一年的efSITT与二丙酸倍氯米松、富马酸福莫特罗二水合物和甘替溴铵与一年的MITT在COPD患者中的加重、抢救药物的使用、依从性和肺功能。结果:共分析71例患者。efSITT后总加重和中度加重的平均次数分别显著减少27.56% (p = 0.0043)和29.56% (p = 0.0008)。efSITT治疗依从性较差的患者比例从30.2%下降到9.9%,完全依从性的患者比例从55.8%上升到81.7%。第一秒平均用力呼气量(% pred)改善2.29%。efSITT治疗组和MITT治疗组在肺炎发生率方面没有观察到差异。结论:TRIPOLI研究表明,从MITT切换到efSITT可能会减少中重度COPD患者的恶化,这可能是由于现实环境中依从性的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信