Reduction Loss Despite Adequate Volar Locking Plate Fixation in Distal Radius Fractures: Analysis of Characteristics and Follow-up Management.

IF 1.9 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.4055/cios24197
Chi-Hoon Oh, Seungyeon Kang, Sung Woo Lee, Soo-Hong Han, Jun-Ku Lee
{"title":"Reduction Loss Despite Adequate Volar Locking Plate Fixation in Distal Radius Fractures: Analysis of Characteristics and Follow-up Management.","authors":"Chi-Hoon Oh, Seungyeon Kang, Sung Woo Lee, Soo-Hong Han, Jun-Ku Lee","doi":"10.4055/cios24197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of distal radius fractures (DRFs) has evolved with the introduction of volar locking plate (VLP) fixation. Nevertheless, despite the low occurrence rates, reduction loss following VLP fixation has been reported in several studies. Our objective was to determine the incidence and features of reduction loss in patients despite the appropriate application of VLP fixation for DRF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted between March 2017 and August 2023, during which a single hand surgeon performed VLP procedures for DRFs. This study included 379 patients (382 wrists) including 3 patients who underwent bilateral surgery. We identified patients who experienced reduction loss after VLP fixation (group 1) and patients without stability problems (group 2) and compared the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 63.5 years, with a standard deviation of 13.8. There were 90 male patients (23.6%) and 289 female patients (75.7%). We identified 14 cases of DRFs, in which reduction loss occurred even after VLP fixation during the follow-up period (group 1, 3.7%). The remaining DRFs were assigned to group 2 (n=368, 96.3%). Among the 14 patients, 7 cases of screw breakage were identified as causing the loss of fracture reduction. As the joint surface collapsed and sank down to the distal row locking screw, 4 cases presented with distal locking screws penetrating into the radiocarpal joint. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of sex, weight, fracture arm direction, and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) fracture classification. However, patients in group 1 were statistically significantly older than those in group 2 (average age, 77.5 years vs. 62 years). Among 4 patients experiencing distal screw violation of the radiocarpal joints, 3 underwent partial or complete screw removal immediately after fracture consolidation or union.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While rare, reduction loss remains a potential complication following VLP fixation, especially in elderly patients with intra-articular DRFs. However, with diligent monitoring and timely intervention, such as implant removal if necessary, acceptable outcomes can still be attained.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"17 3","pages":"478-487"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12104041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The management of distal radius fractures (DRFs) has evolved with the introduction of volar locking plate (VLP) fixation. Nevertheless, despite the low occurrence rates, reduction loss following VLP fixation has been reported in several studies. Our objective was to determine the incidence and features of reduction loss in patients despite the appropriate application of VLP fixation for DRF.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted between March 2017 and August 2023, during which a single hand surgeon performed VLP procedures for DRFs. This study included 379 patients (382 wrists) including 3 patients who underwent bilateral surgery. We identified patients who experienced reduction loss after VLP fixation (group 1) and patients without stability problems (group 2) and compared the 2 groups.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 63.5 years, with a standard deviation of 13.8. There were 90 male patients (23.6%) and 289 female patients (75.7%). We identified 14 cases of DRFs, in which reduction loss occurred even after VLP fixation during the follow-up period (group 1, 3.7%). The remaining DRFs were assigned to group 2 (n=368, 96.3%). Among the 14 patients, 7 cases of screw breakage were identified as causing the loss of fracture reduction. As the joint surface collapsed and sank down to the distal row locking screw, 4 cases presented with distal locking screws penetrating into the radiocarpal joint. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of sex, weight, fracture arm direction, and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) fracture classification. However, patients in group 1 were statistically significantly older than those in group 2 (average age, 77.5 years vs. 62 years). Among 4 patients experiencing distal screw violation of the radiocarpal joints, 3 underwent partial or complete screw removal immediately after fracture consolidation or union.

Conclusions: While rare, reduction loss remains a potential complication following VLP fixation, especially in elderly patients with intra-articular DRFs. However, with diligent monitoring and timely intervention, such as implant removal if necessary, acceptable outcomes can still be attained.

桡骨远端骨折经掌侧锁定钢板固定后复位损失:特点分析及随访处理。
背景:桡骨远端骨折(DRFs)的治疗随着掌侧锁定钢板(VLP)固定的引入而发展。然而,尽管发生率低,一些研究报道了VLP固定后的复位损失。我们的目的是确定在适当应用VLP固定治疗DRF的情况下,患者复位损失的发生率和特征。方法:本回顾性研究于2017年3月至2023年8月进行,在此期间,一名单手外科医生对DRFs进行了VLP手术。本研究纳入379例患者(382个手腕),其中3例患者接受了双侧手术。我们确定了VLP固定后复位丢失的患者(1组)和没有稳定性问题的患者(2组),并对两组进行了比较。结果:患者平均年龄为63.5岁,标准差为13.8。男性90例(23.6%),女性289例(75.7%)。我们确定了14例DRFs,在随访期间,即使在VLP固定后仍发生复位损失(组1,3.7%)。其余drf分配到2组(n= 3668, 96.3%)。14例患者中,7例螺钉断裂导致骨折复位丧失。由于关节面塌陷下沉至远端排锁螺钉,4例出现远端锁螺钉穿透桡腕关节。两组患者在性别、体重、骨折臂方向、Arbeitsgemeinschaft f骨合成/骨科创伤协会(AO/OTA)骨折分型方面均无显著差异。然而,1组患者的年龄明显大于2组(平均年龄77.5岁比62岁)。在4例桡骨腕关节远端螺钉侵犯患者中,3例在骨折巩固或愈合后立即部分或全部取下螺钉。结论:虽然罕见,但复位损失仍然是VLP固定后的潜在并发症,特别是在关节内DRFs的老年患者中。然而,通过认真的监测和及时的干预,如必要时取出种植体,仍然可以获得可接受的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信