Comparative Analysis of Minimally Invasive and Open Proximal Chevron-Akin Osteotomies in Moderate-to-Severe Hallux Valgus Deformity.

IF 1.9 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.4055/cios24450
Jun Young Choi, Sun Oh Jung, Jin Soo Suh
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Minimally Invasive and Open Proximal Chevron-Akin Osteotomies in Moderate-to-Severe Hallux Valgus Deformity.","authors":"Jun Young Choi, Sun Oh Jung, Jin Soo Suh","doi":"10.4055/cios24450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies comparing the minimally invasive proximal chevron and Akin osteotomies (MIPCA) technique with conventional techniques, such as the open proximal chevron metatarsal osteotomy with the Akin procedure (open PCMO-Akin procedure), are limited. This study aimed to compare and evaluate operative MIPCA and open PCMO-Akin procedure outcomes in the surgical correction of moderate-to-severe hallux valgus deformities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes between the MIPCA and open PCMO-Akin procedure in patients with a hallux valgus deformity, defined as a preoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA) of ≥ 30° and/or a first to second intermetatarsal angle of ≥ 13°. The postoperative complication rate was monitored in both groups for a minimum of 12 months. An unsatisfactory correction was defined as an HVA > 15° at final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We assigned 58 and 99 patients to the MIPCA or open PCMO-Akin procedure group, respectively. At final follow-up, no significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of clinical and radiographic parameters (<i>p</i> > 0.05), with the exception of the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) (<i>p</i> = 0.012). No statistically significant postoperative changes in the DMAA were observed in the MIPCA group (<i>p</i> = 0.875). Five patients (5.1%) experienced postoperative hallux varus in the open PCMO-Akin procedure group, whereas no such cases were observed in the MIPCA group. No statistically significant difference in the rate of unsatisfactory correction was observed between the groups at the final follow-up (MIPCA group, 15.5%; open PCMO-Akin procedure group, 10.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.315).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MIPCA technique is a viable alternative to the open PCMO-Akin procedure for correcting moderate-to-severe hallux valgus deformities. Given the potential lack of postoperative changes in the DMAA following the MIPCA technique, careful consideration is advised when applying this technique to patients with a large DMAA.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"17 3","pages":"514-522"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12104030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24450","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies comparing the minimally invasive proximal chevron and Akin osteotomies (MIPCA) technique with conventional techniques, such as the open proximal chevron metatarsal osteotomy with the Akin procedure (open PCMO-Akin procedure), are limited. This study aimed to compare and evaluate operative MIPCA and open PCMO-Akin procedure outcomes in the surgical correction of moderate-to-severe hallux valgus deformities.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes between the MIPCA and open PCMO-Akin procedure in patients with a hallux valgus deformity, defined as a preoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA) of ≥ 30° and/or a first to second intermetatarsal angle of ≥ 13°. The postoperative complication rate was monitored in both groups for a minimum of 12 months. An unsatisfactory correction was defined as an HVA > 15° at final follow-up.

Results: We assigned 58 and 99 patients to the MIPCA or open PCMO-Akin procedure group, respectively. At final follow-up, no significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of clinical and radiographic parameters (p > 0.05), with the exception of the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) (p = 0.012). No statistically significant postoperative changes in the DMAA were observed in the MIPCA group (p = 0.875). Five patients (5.1%) experienced postoperative hallux varus in the open PCMO-Akin procedure group, whereas no such cases were observed in the MIPCA group. No statistically significant difference in the rate of unsatisfactory correction was observed between the groups at the final follow-up (MIPCA group, 15.5%; open PCMO-Akin procedure group, 10.1%; p = 0.315).

Conclusions: The MIPCA technique is a viable alternative to the open PCMO-Akin procedure for correcting moderate-to-severe hallux valgus deformities. Given the potential lack of postoperative changes in the DMAA following the MIPCA technique, careful consideration is advised when applying this technique to patients with a large DMAA.

微创与开放近端切骨术治疗中重度拇外翻畸形的比较分析。
背景:比较微创近端矢状骨和Akin截骨术(MIPCA)技术与传统技术,如开放近端矢状骨截骨术和Akin手术(开放PCMO-Akin手术)的研究是有限的。本研究旨在比较和评估手术MIPCA和开放PCMO-Akin手术矫正中重度拇外翻畸形的结果。方法:我们对外翻畸形患者的临床和影像学结果进行了回顾性比较,外翻畸形定义为术前外翻角(HVA)≥30°和/或第一至第二跖间角≥13°。监测两组患者术后并发症发生率至少12个月。在最后随访时,不满意的矫正定义为HVA bbb15°。结果:我们将58例和99例患者分别分配到MIPCA组和开放PCMO-Akin组。最终随访时,除远端跖骨关节角(DMAA)外,两组间临床和影像学参数均无显著差异(p < 0.05)。MIPCA组术后DMAA变化无统计学意义(p = 0.875)。开放PCMO-Akin手术组5例患者(5.1%)出现术后拇内翻,而MIPCA组未见此类病例。在最后随访时,两组间不满意矫正率无统计学差异(MIPCA组,15.5%;开放PCMO-Akin手术组,10.1%;P = 0.315)。结论:MIPCA技术是一种可行的替代开放PCMO-Akin程序纠正中重度拇外翻畸形。考虑到MIPCA技术后DMAA可能缺乏术后改变,建议在将该技术应用于DMAA较大的患者时要仔细考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信