Postoperative feedback-oriented health education in ambulatory robot-assisted adrenalectomy: a single-center nursing intervention cohort study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Xue Yao, Yanghao Tai, Xiaoyan Luo, Kang Wang, Jiwen Shang
{"title":"Postoperative feedback-oriented health education in ambulatory robot-assisted adrenalectomy: a single-center nursing intervention cohort study.","authors":"Xue Yao, Yanghao Tai, Xiaoyan Luo, Kang Wang, Jiwen Shang","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02416-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To explore the application effect of feedback health education in the care of patients after robot-assisted adrenal tumor resection in ambulatory mode. 100 patients who underwent robot-assisted adrenal tumor resection in the ambulatory surgery department of our hospital from June 2022 to June 2024 were randomly selected as the study subjects and were divided into the observation group (n = 50 cases) and the control group (n = 50 cases). The observation group used feedback health education, the control group used conventional health education, and the two groups were compared with regard to the patients' psychological status, medication adherence, life quality assessment, and patient satisfaction score. After the intervention, the SAD score of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (42.14 ± 3.52 vs. 47.16 ± 4.60, P < 0.001). SAS scores were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (43.9 ± 5.06 vs. 48.36 ± 3.89, P < 0.001). Adherence scores were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (7.16 ± 0.71 vs. 6.56 ± 1.15, P = 0.002), and medication adherence was better in the observation group than in the control group (P = 0.008). ADL scores were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (85.4 ± 5.09 vs. 80.62 ± 5.70, P < 0.001). Nursing satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (85.42 ± 4.79 vs. 81.12 ± 4.88, P < 0.001). Compared with traditional nursing education, the feedback health education method helps improve the psychological state of patients undergoing robotic-assisted adrenal tumor resection in the day mode, and improves medication adherence, quality of life, and nursing satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"255"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02416-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To explore the application effect of feedback health education in the care of patients after robot-assisted adrenal tumor resection in ambulatory mode. 100 patients who underwent robot-assisted adrenal tumor resection in the ambulatory surgery department of our hospital from June 2022 to June 2024 were randomly selected as the study subjects and were divided into the observation group (n = 50 cases) and the control group (n = 50 cases). The observation group used feedback health education, the control group used conventional health education, and the two groups were compared with regard to the patients' psychological status, medication adherence, life quality assessment, and patient satisfaction score. After the intervention, the SAD score of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (42.14 ± 3.52 vs. 47.16 ± 4.60, P < 0.001). SAS scores were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (43.9 ± 5.06 vs. 48.36 ± 3.89, P < 0.001). Adherence scores were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (7.16 ± 0.71 vs. 6.56 ± 1.15, P = 0.002), and medication adherence was better in the observation group than in the control group (P = 0.008). ADL scores were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (85.4 ± 5.09 vs. 80.62 ± 5.70, P < 0.001). Nursing satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (85.42 ± 4.79 vs. 81.12 ± 4.88, P < 0.001). Compared with traditional nursing education, the feedback health education method helps improve the psychological state of patients undergoing robotic-assisted adrenal tumor resection in the day mode, and improves medication adherence, quality of life, and nursing satisfaction.

机器人辅助肾上腺切除术术后以反馈为导向的健康教育:单中心护理干预队列研究。
探讨反馈健康教育在机器人辅助肾上腺肿瘤切除术后患者门诊护理中的应用效果。随机选取2022年6月至2024年6月在我院门诊外科行机器人辅助肾上腺肿瘤切除术的患者100例作为研究对象,分为观察组(n = 50例)和对照组(n = 50例)。观察组采用反馈式健康教育,对照组采用常规健康教育,比较两组患者的心理状态、药物依从性、生活质量评价和患者满意度得分。干预后,观察组SAD评分显著低于对照组(42.14±3.52∶47.16±4.60,P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信