Military Combat Eye Protection uptake of UK service personnel on Operation TORAL in Afghanistan.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
John Breeze, E Lewis, D Bowley, R Coates, C Abbott, P Evans, R Blanch, J Russell
{"title":"Military Combat Eye Protection uptake of UK service personnel on Operation TORAL in Afghanistan.","authors":"John Breeze, E Lewis, D Bowley, R Coates, C Abbott, P Evans, R Blanch, J Russell","doi":"10.1136/military-2025-002982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Military Combat Eye Protection (CEP) is a form of personal protective equipment designed to protect the eyes and surrounding structures. A review of 67 586 US and UK personnel wounded during Iraq and Afghanistan demonstrated that eye injuries were present in 8% of survivors or those who died of wounds. CEP was first introduced to UK military personnel in Iraq during 2006 and has been shown to reduce both the incidence and severity of eye injury, with the current CEP issued as part of the VIRTUS body armour and load carriage system.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>To assess user perception and experience of issued CEP by UK service personnel, a voluntary survey was returned by 200 UK personnel deployed on Operation TORAL, the UK contribution to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)'s Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan post Op HERRICK, from 2014. In total, 10 questions were asked about CEP, including two that allowed users to offer 'free-text' comments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>193 out of 200 (97%) responded that they regularly wore the issued low-impact spectacles, while 54 out of 198 (27%) responded that they regularly changed their lenses. Goggles were worn by only 25 out of 200 (13%), with 64 out of 200 (32%) stating they perceived that there was no requirement for their use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Excellent wearer uptake of low-impact spectacles was found, likely reflecting mandatory use in conjunction with a well-established predeployment educational programme. The poor uptake of medium-impact goggles reflected that either users perceived that there was no requirement to wear them or did not believe they had been issued them. Further research is recommended to identify the optimal colour of lens that should be used. If multiple lens colours are required, lenses should either be easier to change or multiple sets should be issued, along with appropriate training provided for when each lens should be used.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2025-002982","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Military Combat Eye Protection (CEP) is a form of personal protective equipment designed to protect the eyes and surrounding structures. A review of 67 586 US and UK personnel wounded during Iraq and Afghanistan demonstrated that eye injuries were present in 8% of survivors or those who died of wounds. CEP was first introduced to UK military personnel in Iraq during 2006 and has been shown to reduce both the incidence and severity of eye injury, with the current CEP issued as part of the VIRTUS body armour and load carriage system.

Method: To assess user perception and experience of issued CEP by UK service personnel, a voluntary survey was returned by 200 UK personnel deployed on Operation TORAL, the UK contribution to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)'s Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan post Op HERRICK, from 2014. In total, 10 questions were asked about CEP, including two that allowed users to offer 'free-text' comments.

Results: 193 out of 200 (97%) responded that they regularly wore the issued low-impact spectacles, while 54 out of 198 (27%) responded that they regularly changed their lenses. Goggles were worn by only 25 out of 200 (13%), with 64 out of 200 (32%) stating they perceived that there was no requirement for their use.

Conclusions: Excellent wearer uptake of low-impact spectacles was found, likely reflecting mandatory use in conjunction with a well-established predeployment educational programme. The poor uptake of medium-impact goggles reflected that either users perceived that there was no requirement to wear them or did not believe they had been issued them. Further research is recommended to identify the optimal colour of lens that should be used. If multiple lens colours are required, lenses should either be easier to change or multiple sets should be issued, along with appropriate training provided for when each lens should be used.

在阿富汗的托拉尔行动中,英国服务人员的军事战斗护眼装置。
简介:军事战斗护眼(CEP)是一种个人防护装备,旨在保护眼睛和周围结构。一项对在伊拉克和阿富汗战争中受伤的67 586名美国和英国人员的调查显示,8%的幸存者或因伤死亡的人眼睛受伤。CEP于2006年首次被引入到伊拉克的英国军事人员中,并被证明可以减少眼睛受伤的发生率和严重程度,目前CEP作为VIRTUS防弹衣和载重运输系统的一部分发布。方法:为了评估英国服务人员对发布的CEP的用户感知和体验,从2014年开始,对200名英国服役人员进行了自愿调查,该人员是英国对北大西洋公约组织(NATO)在阿富汗的坚决支持任务(HERRICK行动)的贡献。总共有10个关于CEP的问题,包括两个允许用户提供“自由文本”评论的问题。结果:200名受访者中有193名(97%)表示会定期佩戴配发的低冲击力眼镜,198名受访者中有54名(27%)表示会定期更换镜片。200人中只有25人(13%)戴了护目镜,200人中有64人(32%)表示他们认为没有必要戴护目镜。结论:佩戴者对低冲击眼镜的接受程度很高,可能反映了强制性使用与完善的部署前教育计划相结合。中等冲击护目镜的使用率较低反映出,要么用户认为没有要求佩戴护目镜,要么不相信已经发放了护目镜。建议进一步研究,以确定应使用的最佳镜片颜色。如果需要多种镜片颜色,镜片应该更容易更换,或者应该发放多套镜片,并提供适当的培训,以说明每种镜片的使用时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bmj Military Health
Bmj Military Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信