A Detailed Analysis of How Physiotherapists "Give" Reassurance for Patients' Concerns in Back Pain Consultations.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Ian Cowell, Alison McGregor, Peter O'Sullivan, Kieran O'Sullivan, Ross Poyton, Veronika Schoeb, Ged Murtagh
{"title":"A Detailed Analysis of How Physiotherapists \"Give\" Reassurance for Patients' Concerns in Back Pain Consultations.","authors":"Ian Cowell, Alison McGregor, Peter O'Sullivan, Kieran O'Sullivan, Ross Poyton, Veronika Schoeb, Ged Murtagh","doi":"10.1177/10497323251320874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reassuring patients with low back pain to reduce their concerns is important for good clinical practice. However, guidelines provide little information on how physiotherapists should best deliver reassurance. This study explores how \"reassurance\" is enacted by physiotherapists and back pain patients during an initial consultation. The research setting was primary care. Twenty initial physiotherapy consultations were video-recorded and transcribed. The patient-physiotherapist interactions were analyzed using conversation analysis, a qualitative observational method. These data highlighted how some physiotherapists gave reassurance directed by what they considered to be important but not always grounded in patients' expressed concerns. We also observed examples where physiotherapists developed a better understanding of patients' concerns, which provided more patient-focused and targeted reassurance with less interactional \"trouble\" and greater patient affiliation. These findings suggest that physiotherapists should develop a good understanding of patients' concerns, and take them into consideration, before delivering their reassurance. This will require that physiotherapists be responsive to patients' concerns and adapt their communication to the individual needs of the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323251320874"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251320874","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reassuring patients with low back pain to reduce their concerns is important for good clinical practice. However, guidelines provide little information on how physiotherapists should best deliver reassurance. This study explores how "reassurance" is enacted by physiotherapists and back pain patients during an initial consultation. The research setting was primary care. Twenty initial physiotherapy consultations were video-recorded and transcribed. The patient-physiotherapist interactions were analyzed using conversation analysis, a qualitative observational method. These data highlighted how some physiotherapists gave reassurance directed by what they considered to be important but not always grounded in patients' expressed concerns. We also observed examples where physiotherapists developed a better understanding of patients' concerns, which provided more patient-focused and targeted reassurance with less interactional "trouble" and greater patient affiliation. These findings suggest that physiotherapists should develop a good understanding of patients' concerns, and take them into consideration, before delivering their reassurance. This will require that physiotherapists be responsive to patients' concerns and adapt their communication to the individual needs of the patient.

详细分析物理治疗师如何“给予”病人在背部疼痛咨询的担忧保证。
让腰痛患者放心,减少他们的担忧对于良好的临床实践很重要。然而,指导方针没有提供关于物理治疗师如何最好地提供保证的信息。本研究探讨了物理治疗师和背痛患者在初次会诊时如何进行“安抚”。研究环境为初级保健。对20次初始物理治疗咨询进行录像和转录。患者与物理治疗师的互动使用对话分析,一种定性观察方法进行分析。这些数据强调了一些物理治疗师如何根据他们认为重要的事情来给予安慰,但并不总是基于患者表达的担忧。我们还观察到物理治疗师更好地理解患者的担忧的例子,这提供了更多的以患者为中心和有针对性的保证,减少了相互“麻烦”和更多的患者联系。这些发现表明,物理治疗师应该对患者的担忧有一个很好的理解,并在提供安慰之前将其考虑进去。这将要求物理治疗师对患者的关注做出反应,并根据患者的个人需求调整他们的沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信